kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

19637 Commits

6 Branches

36 Tags

131 MiB

Tree: 5b590d783a

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Stephan Beyer	d492b31caf	t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git" This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git". This is useful to - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal, e.g. SIGSEGV, and - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Jeff King	ca74c458a3	send-pack: assign remote errors to each ref This lets us show remote errors (e.g., a denied hook) along with the usual push output. There is a slightly clever optimization in receive_status that bears explanation. We need to correlate the returned status and our ref objects, which naively could be an O(m*n) operation. However, since the current implementation of receive-pack returns the errors to us in the same order that we sent them, we optimistically look for the next ref to be looked up to come after the last one we have found. So it should be an O(m+n) merge if the receive-pack behavior holds, but we fall back to a correct but slower behavior if it should change. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Stephan Beyer

d492b31caf

t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git"

This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning
that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git".

This is useful to

 - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal,
   e.g. SIGSEGV, and

 - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests.

Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

17 years ago

Jeff King

ca74c458a3

send-pack: assign remote errors to each ref

This lets us show remote errors (e.g., a denied hook) along
with the usual push output.

There is a slightly clever optimization in receive_status
that bears explanation. We need to correlate the returned
status and our ref objects, which naively could be an O(m*n)
operation. However, since the current implementation of
receive-pack returns the errors to us in the same order that
we sent them, we optimistically look for the next ref to be
looked up to come after the last one we have found. So it
should be an O(m+n) merge if the receive-pack behavior
holds, but we fall back to a correct but slower behavior if
it should change.

Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Acked-by: Daniel Barkalow <barkalow@iabervon.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

17 years ago

2 Commits (5b590d783a461c63fa803d1c21b57bc79c0207f7)