kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

36308 Commits

6 Branches

36 Tags

131 MiB

Tree: 51bb8adbc9

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Karsten Blees	2092678cd5	name-hash.c: fix endless loop with core.ignorecase=true With core.ignorecase=true, name-hash.c builds a case insensitive index of all tracked directories. Currently, the existing cache entry structures are added multiple times to the same hashtable (with different name lengths and hash codes). However, there's only one dir_next pointer, which gets completely messed up in case of hash collisions. In the worst case, this causes an endless loop if ce == ce->dir_next (see t7062). Use a separate hashtable and separate structures for the directory index so that each directory entry has its own next pointer. Use reference counting to track which directory entry contains files. There are only slight changes to the name-hash.c API: - new free_name_hash() used by read_cache.c::discard_index() - remove_name_hash() takes an additional index_state parameter - index_name_exists() for a directory (trailing '/') may return a cache entry that has been removed (CE_UNHASHED). This is not a problem as the return value is only used to check if the directory exists (dir.c) or to normalize casing of directory names (read-cache.c). Getting rid of cache_entry.dir_next reduces memory consumption, especially with core.ignorecase=false (which doesn't use that member at all). With core.ignorecase=true, building the directory index is slightly faster as we add / check the parent directory first (instead of going through all directory levels for each file in the index). E.g. with WebKit (~200k files, ~7k dirs), time spent in lazy_init_name_hash is reduced from 176ms to 130ms. Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Karsten Blees

2092678cd5

name-hash.c: fix endless loop with core.ignorecase=true

With core.ignorecase=true, name-hash.c builds a case insensitive index of
all tracked directories. Currently, the existing cache entry structures are
added multiple times to the same hashtable (with different name lengths and
hash codes). However, there's only one dir_next pointer, which gets
completely messed up in case of hash collisions. In the worst case, this
causes an endless loop if ce == ce->dir_next (see t7062).

Use a separate hashtable and separate structures for the directory index
so that each directory entry has its own next pointer. Use reference
counting to track which directory entry contains files.

There are only slight changes to the name-hash.c API:
- new free_name_hash() used by read_cache.c::discard_index()
- remove_name_hash() takes an additional index_state parameter
- index_name_exists() for a directory (trailing '/') may return a cache
  entry that has been removed (CE_UNHASHED). This is not a problem as the
  return value is only used to check if the directory exists (dir.c) or to
  normalize casing of directory names (read-cache.c).

Getting rid of cache_entry.dir_next reduces memory consumption, especially
with core.ignorecase=false (which doesn't use that member at all).

With core.ignorecase=true, building the directory index is slightly faster
as we add / check the parent directory first (instead of going through all
directory levels for each file in the index). E.g. with WebKit (~200k
files, ~7k dirs), time spent in lazy_init_name_hash is reduced from 176ms
to 130ms.

Signed-off-by: Karsten Blees <blees@dcon.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

12 years ago

1 Commits (51bb8adbc9d59ae042eb9134e5218240a1532bea)