kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	c91cfd1916	tests: A SANITY test prereq for testing if we're root Some tests depend on not being able to write to files after chmod -w. This doesn't work when running the tests as root. Change test-lib.sh to test if this works, and if so it sets a new SANITY test prerequisite. The tests that use this previously failed when run under root. There was already a test for this in t3600-rm.sh, added by Junio C Hamano in `2283645` in 2006. That check now uses the new SANITY prerequisite. Some of this was resurrected from the "Tests in Cygwin" thread in May 2009: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/116729/focus=118385 Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	14 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	fadb5156e4	tests: Skip tests in a way that makes sense under TAP SKIP messages are now part of the TAP plan. A TAP harness now knows why a particular test was skipped and can report that information. The non-TAP harness built into Git's test-lib did nothing special with these messages, and is unaffected by these changes. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Jeff King	3fc0d131c5	rm: fix bug in recursive subdirectory removal If we remove a path in a/deep/subdirectory, we should try to remove as many trailing components as possible (i.e., subdirectory, then deep, then a). However, the test for the return value of rmdir was reversed, so we only ever deleted at most one level. The fix is in remove_path, so "apply" and "merge-recursive" also are fixed. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Johannes Sixt	56e78bfb29	t3600: Use test prerequisite tags There are two prerequisites: - The filesystem supports names with tabs or new-lines. - Files cannot be removed if their containing directory is read-only. Previously, whether these preconditions are satisified was tested inside test_expect_success. We move these tests outside because, strictly speaking, they are not part of the tests. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>	16 years ago
Johannes Sixt	5b46a4285f	Call 'say' outside test_expect_success There were some uses of 'say' inside test_expect_success. But if the tests were not run in verbose mode, this message went to /dev/null. Pull them out of test_expect_success. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>	16 years ago
Johannes Sixt	fae74a04d7	test suite: Use 'say' to say something instead of 'test_expect_success' Some tests report that some tests will be skipped. They used 'test_expect_success' with a trivially successful test. Nowadays we have the helper function 'say' for this purpose. In on case, 'say_color skip' is replaced by 'say' because the former is not intended as a public API. Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <j6t@kdbg.org>	16 years ago
Junio C Hamano	0693f9ddad	Make sure lockfiles are unlocked when dying on SIGPIPE We cleaned up lockfiles upon receiving the usual suspects HUP, TERM, QUIT but a wicked user could kill us of asphyxiation by piping our output to a pipe that does not read. Protect ourselves by catching SIGPIPE and clean up the lockfiles as well in such a case. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Junio C Hamano	388b2acd6e	git add --intent-to-add: fix removal of cached emptiness This uses the extended index flag mechanism introduced earlier to mark the entries added to the index via "git add -N" with CE_INTENT_TO_ADD. The logic to detect an "intent to add" entry for the purpose of allowing "git rm --cached $path" is tightened to check not just for a staged empty blob, but with the CE_INTENT_TO_ADD bit. This protects an empty blob that was explicitly added and then modified in the work tree from being dropped with this sequence: $ >empty $ git add empty $ echo "non empty" >empty $ git rm --cached empty Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Jeff King	f55527f802	rm: loosen safety valve for empty files If a file is different between the working tree copy, the index, and the HEAD, then we do not allow it to be deleted without --force. However, this is overly tight in the face of "git add --intent-to-add": $ git add --intent-to-add file $ : oops, I don't actually want to stage that yet $ git rm --cached file error: 'empty' has staged content different from both the file and the HEAD (use -f to force removal) $ git rm -f --cached file Unfortunately, there is currently no way to distinguish between an empty file that has been added and an "intent to add" file. The ideal behavior would be to disallow the former while allowing the latter. This patch loosens the safety valve to allow the deletion only if we are deleting the cached entry and the cached content is empty. This covers the intent-to-add situation, and assumes there is little harm in not protecting users who have legitimately added an empty file. In many cases, the file will still be empty, in which case the safety valve does not trigger anyway (since the content remains untouched in the working tree). Otherwise, we do remove the fact that no content was staged, but given that the content is by definition empty, it is not terribly difficult for a user to recreate it. However, we still document the desired behavior in the form of two tests. One checks the correct removal of an intent-to-add file. The other checks that we still disallow removal of empty files, but is marked as expect_failure to indicate this compromise. If the intent-to-add feature is ever extended to differentiate between normal empty files and intent-to-add files, then the safety valve can be re-tightened. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	cced48a808	git rm: refresh index before up-to-date check Since "git rm" is supposed to be porcelain, we should convince it to be user friendly by refreshing the index itself. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>	16 years ago
Nanako Shiraishi	3604e7c5c6	tests: use "git xyzzy" form (t3600 - t6999) Converts tests between t3600-t6300. Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Olivier Marin	4d26467279	builtin-rm: fix index lock file path When hold_locked_index() is called with a relative git_dir and you are outside the work tree, the lock file become relative to the current directory. So when later setup_work_tree() change the current directory it breaks lock file path and commit_locked_index() fails. This patch move index locking code after setup_work_tree() call to make lock file relative to the working tree as it should be and add a test case. Noticed by Nick Andrew. Signed-off-by: Olivier Marin <dkr@freesurf.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Stephan Beyer	d492b31caf	t/: Use "test_must_fail git" instead of "! git" This patch changes every occurrence of "! git" -- with the meaning that a git call has to gracefully fail -- into "test_must_fail git". This is useful to - make sure the test does not fail because of a signal, e.g. SIGSEGV, and - advertise the use of "test_must_fail" for new tests. Signed-off-by: Stephan Beyer <s-beyer@gmx.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	41ac414ea2	Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test should succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	0feb4d1c99	t/t{3600,3800,5401}: do not use egrep when grep would do There is nothing _wrong_ with egrep per se, but this way we would have less dependency on external tools. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Matthieu Moy	bdecd9d41b	More permissive "git-rm --cached" behavior without -f. In the previous behavior, "git-rm --cached" (without -f) had the same restriction as "git-rm". This forced the user to use the -f flag in situations which weren't actually dangerous, like: $ git add foo # oops, I didn't want this $ git rm --cached foo # back to initial situation Previously, the index had to match the file and the HEAD. With --cached, the index must now match the file or the HEAD. The behavior without --cached is unchanged, but provides better error messages. Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	5be60078c9	Rewrite "git-frotz" to "git frotz" This uses the remove-dashes target to replace "git-frotz" to "git frotz". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	18 years ago
Steven Grimm	bb1faf0d5b	Add --ignore-unmatch option to exit with zero status when no files are removed. Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Steven Grimm	b48caa20de	Add --quiet option to suppress output of "rm" commands for removed files. Signed-off-by: Steven Grimm <koreth@midwinter.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	467e1b5383	t3600: update the test for updated git rm Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Shawn Pearce	22669a045a	Remove unnecessary output from t3600-rm. Moved the setup commands into test_expect_success blocks so their output is hidden unless -v is used. This makes the test suite look a little cleaner when the rm test-file setup step fails (and was expected to fail for most cases). Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago
Junio C Hamano	2283645b85	t3600-rm: skip failed-remove test when we cannot make an unremovable file. When running t3600-rm test under fakeroot (or as root), we cannot make a file unremovable with "chmod a-w .". Detect this case early and skip that test. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago
Alex Riesen	d51fac5310	workaround fat/ntfs deficiencies for t3600-rm.sh (git-rm) Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <ariesen@harmanbecker.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago
Carl Worth	3844cdc8f1	git-rm: Fix to properly handle files with spaces, tabs, newlines, etc. New tests are added to the git-rm test case to cover this as well. Signed-off-by: Carl Worth <cworth@cworth.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago
Carl Worth	d4a1cab541	Add new git-rm command with documentation This adds a git-rm command which provides convenience similar to git-add, (and a bit more since it takes care of the rm as well if given -f). Like git-add, git-rm expands the given path names through git-ls-files. This means it only acts on files listed in the index. And it does act recursively on directories by default, (no -r needed as in the case of rm itself). When it recurses, it does not remove empty directories that are left behind. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago

26 Commits (4ab9a157d06956ce5a1060a28404cbade3039fa2)