kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
René Scharfe	0cc7380d88	log-tree: call load_ref_decorations() in get_name_decoration() Load a default set of ref name decorations at the first lookup. This frees direct and indirect callers from doing so. They can still do it if they want to use a filter or are interested in full decorations instead of the default short ones -- the first load_ref_decorations() call wins. This means that the load in builtin/log.c::cmd_log_init_finish() is respected even if --simplify-by-decoration is given, as the previously dominating earlier load in handle_revision_opt() is gone. So a filter given with --decorate-refs-exclude is used for simplification in that case, as expected. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
René Scharfe	dad3f0607b	tag: factor out get_tagged_oid() Add a function for accessing the ID of the object referenced by a tag safely, i.e. without causing a segfault when encountering a broken tag where ->tagged is NULL. Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Jeff King	19e8789b23	revision: allow --end-of-options to end option parsing There's currently no robust way to tell Git that a particular option is meant to be a revision, and not an option. So if you have a branch "refs/heads/--foo", you cannot just say: git rev-list --foo You can say: git rev-list refs/heads/--foo But that breaks down if you don't know the refname, and in particular if you're a script passing along a value from elsewhere. In most programs, you can use "--" to end option parsing, like this: some-prog -- "$revision" But that doesn't work for the revision parser, because "--" is already meaningful there: it separates revisions from pathspecs. So we need some other marker to separate options from revisions. This patch introduces "--end-of-options", which serves that purpose: git rev-list --oneline --end-of-options "$revision" will work regardless of what's in "$revision" (well, if you say "--" it may fail, but it won't do something dangerous, like triggering an unexpected option). The name is verbose, but that's probably a good thing; this is meant to be used for scripted invocations where readability is more important than terseness. One alternative would be to introduce an explicit option to mark a revision, like: git rev-list --oneline --revision="$revision" That's slightly _more_ informative than this commit (because it makes even something silly like "--" unambiguous). But the pattern of using a separator like "--" is well established in git and in other commands, and it makes some scripting tasks simpler like: git rev-list --end-of-options "$@" There's no documentation in this patch, because it will make sense to describe the feature once it is available everywhere (and support will be added in further patches). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Jeff King	39b44ba771	check_everything_connected: assume alternate ref tips are valid When we receive a remote ref update to sha1 "X", we want to check that we have all of the objects needed by "X". We can assume that our repository is not currently corrupted, and therefore if we have a ref pointing at "Y", we have all of its objects. So we can stop our traversal from "X" as soon as we hit "Y". If we make the same non-corruption assumption about any repositories we use to store alternates, then we can also use their ref tips to shorten the traversal. This is especially useful when cloning with "--reference", as we otherwise do not have any local refs to check against, and have to traverse the whole history, even though the other side may have sent us few or no objects. Here are results for the included perf test (which shows off more or less the maximal savings, getting one new commit and sharing the whole history): Test HEAD^ HEAD -------------------------------------------------------------------- [on git.git] 5600.3: clone --reference 2.94(2.86+0.08) 0.09(0.08+0.01) -96.9% [on linux.git] 5600.3: clone --reference 45.74(45.34+0.41) 0.36(0.30+0.08) -99.2% Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason	44570188a0	grep: don't use PCRE2?_UTF8 with "log --encoding=<non-utf8>" Fix a bug introduced in `18547aacf5` ("grep/pcre: support utf-8", 2016-06-25) that was missed due to a blindspot in our tests, as discussed in the previous commit. I then blindly copied the same bug in `94da9193a6` ("grep: add support for PCRE v2", 2017-06-01) when adding the PCRE v2 code. We should not tell PCRE that we're processing UTF-8 just because we're dealing with non-ASCII. In the case of e.g. "log --encoding=<...>" under is_utf8_locale() the haystack might be in ISO-8859-1, and the needle might be in a non-UTF-8 encoding. Maybe we should be more strict here and die earlier? Should we also be converting the needle to the encoding in question, and failing if it's not a string that's valid in that encoding? Maybe. But for now matching this as non-UTF8 at least has some hope of producing sensible results, since we know that our default heuristic of assuming the text to be matched is in the user locale encoding isn't true when we've explicitly encoded it to be in a different encoding. Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	1d8e31a3f6	revision: keep topo-walk free of unintersting commits When updating the topo-order walk in `b454241` (revision.c: generation-based topo-order algorithm, 2018-11-01), the logic was a huge rewrite of the walk logic. In that massive change, we accidentally included the UNINTERESTING commits in expand_topo_walk(). This means that a simple query like git rev-list --topo-order HEAD~1..HEAD will expand the topo walk for all commits reachable from HEAD, and not just one commit. This change should speed up these cases, but there is still a need for corrected commit-date for some A..B queries. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	1b4d8827ff	revision: use generation for A..B --topo-order queries If a commit-graph exists with computed generation numbers, then a 'git rev-list --topo-order -n <N> <rev>' query will use those generation numbers to reduce the number of commits walked before writing N commits. One caveat put in `b454241` (revision.c: generation-based topo-order algorithm, 2018-11-01) was to not enable the new algorithm for queries with a revision range "A..B". The logic was placed to walk from "A" and mark those commits as uninteresting, but the performance was actually worse than the existing logic in some cases. The root cause of this performance degradation is that generation numbers _increase_ the number of commits we walk relative to the existing heuristic of walking by commit date. While generation numbers actually guarantee that the algorithm is correct, the existing logic is very rarely wrong and that added requirement is not worth the cost. This motivates the planned "corrected commit date" to replace generation numbers in a future version of Git. The current change enables the logic to use whatever reachability index is currently in the commit-graph (generation numbers or corrected commit date). The limited flag in struct rev_info forces a full walk of the commit history (after discovering the A..B range). Previosuly, it is enabled whenever we see an uninteresting commit. We prevent enabling the parameter when we are planning to use the reachability index for a topo-order. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Jeff King	8320b1dbe7	revision: use a prio_queue to hold rewritten parents This patch fixes a quadratic list insertion in rewrite_one() when pathspec limiting is combined with --parents. What happens is something like this: 1. We see that some commit X touches the path, so we try to rewrite its parents. 2. rewrite_one() loops forever, rewriting parents, until it finds a relevant parent (or hits the root and decides there are none). The heavy lifting is done by process_parent(), which uses try_to_simplify_commit() to drop parents. 3. process_parent() puts any intermediate parents into the &revs->commits list, inserting by commit date as usual. So if commit X is recent, and then there's a large chunk of history that doesn't touch the path, we may add a lot of commits to &revs->commits. And insertion by commit date is O(n) in the worst case, making the whole thing quadratic. We tried to deal with this long ago in `fce87ae538` (Fix quadratic performance in rewrite_one., 2008-07-12). In that scheme, we cache the oldest commit in the list; if the new commit to be added is older, we can start our linear traversal there. This often works well in practice because parents are older than their descendants, and thus we tend to add older and older commits as we traverse. But this isn't guaranteed, and in fact there's a simple case where it is not: merges. Imagine we look at the first parent of a merge and see a very old commit (let's say 3 years old). And on the second parent, as we go back 3 years in history, we might have many commits. That one first-parent commit has polluted our oldest-commit cache; it will remain the oldest while we traverse a huge chunk of history, during which we have to fall back to the slow, linear method of adding to the list. Naively, one might imagine that instead of caching the oldest commit, we'd start at the last-added one. But that just makes some cases faster while making others slower (and indeed, while it made a real-world test case much faster, it does quite poorly in the perf test include here). Fundamentally, these are just heuristics; our worst case is still quadratic, and some cases will approach that. Instead, let's use a data structure with better worst-case performance. Swapping out revs->commits for something else would have repercussions all over the code base, but we can take advantage of one fact: for the rewrite_one() case, nobody actually needs to see those commits in revs->commits until we've finished generating the whole list. That leaves us with two obvious options: 1. We can generate the list _unordered_, which should be O(n), and then sort it afterwards, which would be O(n log n) total. This is "sort-after" below. 2. We can insert the commits into a separate data structure, like a priority queue. This is "prio-queue" below. I expected that sort-after would be the fastest (since it saves us the extra step of copying the items into the linked list), but surprisingly the prio-queue seems to be a bit faster. Here are timings for the new p0001.6 for all three techniques across a few repositories, as compared to master: master cache-last sort-after prio-queue -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GIT_PERF_REPO=git.git 0.52(0.50+0.02) 0.53(0.51+0.02) +1.9% 0.37(0.33+0.03) -28.8% 0.37(0.32+0.04) -28.8% GIT_PERF_REPO=linux.git 20.81(20.74+0.07) 20.31(20.24+0.07) -2.4% 0.94(0.86+0.07) -95.5% 0.91(0.82+0.09) -95.6% GIT_PERF_REPO=llvm-project.git 83.67(83.57+0.09) 4.23(4.15+0.08) -94.9% 3.21(3.15+0.06) -96.2% 2.98(2.91+0.07) -96.4% A few items to note: - the cache-list tweak does improve the bad case for llvm-project.git that started my digging into this problem. But it performs terribly on linux.git, barely helping at all. - the sort-after and prio-queue techniques work well. They approach the timing for running without --parents at all, which is what you'd expect (see below for more data). - prio-queue just barely outperforms sort-after. As I said, I'm not really sure why this is the case, but it is. You can see it even more prominently in this real-world case on llvm-project.git: git rev-list --parents 07ef786652e7 -- llvm/test/CodeGen/Generic/bswap.ll where prio-queue routinely outperforms sort-after by about 7%. One guess is that the prio-queue may just be more efficient because it uses a compact array. There are three new perf tests: - "rev-list --parents" gives us a baseline for running with --parents. This isn't sped up meaningfully here, because the bad case is triggered only with simplification. But it's good to make sure we don't screw it up (now, or in the future). - "rev-list -- dummy" gives us a baseline for just traversing with pathspec limiting. This gives a lower bound for the next test (and it's also a good thing for us to be checking in general for regressions, since we don't seem to have any existing tests). - "rev-list --parents -- dummy" shows off the problem (and our fix) Here are the timings for those three on llvm-project.git, before and after the fix: Test master prio-queue ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 0001.3: rev-list --parents 2.24(2.12+0.12) 2.22(2.11+0.11) -0.9% 0001.5: rev-list -- dummy 2.89(2.82+0.07) 2.92(2.89+0.03) +1.0% 0001.6: rev-list --parents -- dummy 83.67(83.57+0.09) 2.98(2.91+0.07) -96.4% Changes in the first two are basically noise, and you can see we approach our lower bound in the final one. Note that we can't fully get rid of the list argument from process_parents(). Other callers do have lists, and it would be hard to convert them. They also don't seem to have this problem (probably because they actually remove items from the list as they loop, meaning it doesn't grow so large in the first place). So this basically just drops the "cache_ptr" parameter (which was used only by the one caller we're fixing here) and replaces it with a prio_queue. Callers are free to use either data structure, depending on what they're prepared to handle. Reported-by: Björn Pettersson A <bjorn.a.pettersson@ericsson.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Jeff King	9163399535	revision: drop some unused "revs" parameters There are several internal helpers that take a rev_info struct but don't actually look at it. While one could argue that all helpers in revision.c should take a rev_info struct for consistency, dropping the unused parameter makes it clear that they don't actually depend on any other rev options. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Jeff King	05314efaea	line-log: detect unsupported formats If you use "log -L" with an output format like "--raw" or "--stat", we'll silently ignore the format and just output the normal patch. Let's detect and complain about this, which at least tells the user what's going on. The tests here aren't exhaustive over the set of all formats, but it should at least let us know if somebody breaks the format-checking. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Elijah Newren	d76ce4f734	log,diff-tree: add --combined-all-paths option The combined diff format for merges will only list one filename, even if rename or copy detection is active. For example, with raw format one might see: ::100644 100644 100644 `fabadb8` `cc95eb0` `4866510` MM describe.c ::100755 100755 100755 52b7a2d 6d1ac04 d2ac7d7 RM bar.sh ::100644 100644 100644 e07d6c5 9042e82 ee91881 RR phooey.c This doesn't let us know what the original name of bar.sh was in the first parent, and doesn't let us know what either of the original names of phooey.c were in either of the parents. In contrast, for non-merge commits, raw format does provide original filenames (and a rename score to boot). In order to also provide original filenames for merge commits, add a --combined-all-paths option (which must be used with either -c or --cc, and is likely only useful with rename or copy detection active) so that we can print tab-separated filenames when renames are involved. This transforms the above output to: ::100644 100644 100644 `fabadb8` `cc95eb0` `4866510` MM desc.c desc.c desc.c ::100755 100755 100755 52b7a2d 6d1ac04 d2ac7d7 RM foo.sh bar.sh bar.sh ::100644 100644 100644 e07d6c5 9042e82 ee91881 RR fooey.c fuey.c phooey.c Further, in patch format, this changes the from/to headers so that instead of just having one "from" header, we get one for each parent. For example, instead of having --- a/phooey.c +++ b/phooey.c we would see --- a/fooey.c --- a/fuey.c +++ b/phooey.c Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	d5d2e93577	revision: implement sparse algorithm When enumerating objects to place in a pack-file during 'git pack-objects --revs', we discover the "frontier" of commits that we care about and the boundary with commit we find uninteresting. From that point, we walk trees to discover which trees and blobs are uninteresting. Finally, we walk trees from the interesting commits to find the interesting objects that are placed in the pack. This commit introduces a new, "sparse" way to discover the uninteresting trees. We use the perspective of a single user trying to push their topic to a large repository. That user likely changed a very small fraction of the paths in their working directory, but we spend a lot of time walking all reachable trees. The way to switch the logic to work in this sparse way is to start caring about which paths introduce new trees. While it is not possible to generate a diff between the frontier boundary and all of the interesting commits, we can simulate that behavior by inspecting all of the root trees as a whole, then recursing down to the set of trees at each path. We already had taken the first step by passing an oidset to mark_trees_uninteresting_sparse(). We now create a dictionary whose keys are paths and values are oidsets. We consider the set of trees that appear at each path. While we inspect a tree, we add its subtrees to the oidsets corresponding to the tree entry's path. We also mark trees as UNINTERESTING if the tree we are parsing is UNINTERESTING. To actually improve the performance, we need to terminate our recursion. If the oidset contains only UNINTERESTING trees, then we do not continue the recursion. This avoids walking trees that are likely to not be reachable from interesting trees. If the oidset contains only interesting trees, then we will walk these trees in the final stage that collects the intersting objects to place in the pack. Thus, we only recurse if the oidset contains both interesting and UNINITERESTING trees. There are a few ways that this is not a universally better option. First, we can pack extra objects. If someone copies a subtree from one tree to another, the first tree will appear UNINTERESTING and we will not recurse to see that the subtree should also be UNINTERESTING. We will walk the new tree and see the subtree as a "new" object and add it to the pack. A test is modified to demonstrate this behavior and to verify that the new logic is being exercised. Second, we can have extra memory pressure. If instead of being a single user pushing a small topic we are a server sending new objects from across the entire working directory, then we will gain very little (the recursion will rarely terminate early) but will spend extra time maintaining the path-oidset dictionaries. Despite these potential drawbacks, the benefits of the algorithm are clear. By adding a counter to 'add_children_by_path' and 'mark_tree_contents_uninteresting', I measured the number of parsed trees for the two algorithms in a variety of repos. For git.git, I used the following input: v2.19.0 ^v2.19.0~10 Objects to pack: 550 Walked (old alg): 282 Walked (new alg): 130 For the Linux repo, I used the following input: v4.18 ^v4.18~10 Objects to pack: 518 Walked (old alg): 4,836 Walked (new alg): 188 The two repos above are rather "wide and flat" compared to other repos that I have used in the past. As a comparison, I tested an old topic branch in the Azure DevOps repo, which has a much deeper folder structure than the Linux repo. Objects to pack: 220 Walked (old alg): 22,804 Walked (new alg): 129 I used the number of walked trees the main metric above because it is consistent across multiple runs. When I ran my tests, the performance of the pack-objects command with the same options could change the end-to-end time by 10x depending on the file system being warm. However, by repeating the same test on repeat I could get more consistent timing results. The git.git and Linux tests were too fast overall (less than 0.5s) to measure an end-to-end difference. The Azure DevOps case was slow enough to see the time improve from 15s to 1s in the warm case. The cold case was 90s to 9s in my testing. These improvements will have even larger benefits in the super- large Windows repository. In our experiments, we see the "Enumerate objects" phase of pack-objects taking 60-80% of the end-to-end time of non-trivial pushes, taking longer than the network time to send the pack and the server time to verify the pack. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	f1f5de442f	revision: add mark_tree_uninteresting_sparse In preparation for a new algorithm that walks fewer trees when creating a pack from a set of revisions, create a method that takes an oidset of tree oids and marks reachable objects as UNINTERESTING. The current implementation uses the existing mark_tree_uninteresting to recursively walk the trees and blobs. This will walk the same number of trees as the old mechanism. To ensure that mark_tree_uninteresting walks the tree, we need to remove the UNINTERESTING flag before calling the method. This implementation will be replaced entirely in a later commit. There is one new assumption in this approach: we are also given the oids of the interesting trees. This implementation does not use those trees at the moment, but we will use them in a later rewrite of this method. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
brian m. carlson	ea82b2a085	tree-walk: store object_id in a separate member When parsing a tree, we read the object ID directly out of the tree buffer. This is normally fine, but such an object ID cannot be used with oidcpy, which copies GIT_MAX_RAWSZ bytes, because if we are using SHA-1, there may not be that many bytes to copy. Instead, store the object ID in a separate struct member. Since we can no longer efficiently compute the path length, store that information as well in struct name_entry. Ensure we only copy the object ID into the new buffer if the path length is nonzero, as some callers will pass us an empty path with no object ID following it, and we will not want to read past the end of the buffer. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	3a7a698e93	sha1-name.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index This kills the_index dependency in get_oid_with_context() but for get_oid() and friends, they still assume the_repository (which also means the_index). Unfortunately the widespread use of get_oid() will make it hard to make the conversion now. We probably will add repo_get_oid() at some point and limit the use of get_oid() in builtin/ instead of forcing all get_oid() call sites to carry struct repository. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	e1ff0a32e4	read-cache.c: kill read_index() read_index() shares the same problem as hold_locked_index(): it assumes $GIT_DIR/index. Move all call sites to repo_read_index() instead. read_index_preload() and read_index_unmerged() are also killed as a consequence. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Jonathan Tan	ec0c5798ee	revision: use commit graph in get_reference() When fetching into a repository, a connectivity check is first made by check_exist_and_connected() in builtin/fetch.c that runs: git rev-list --objects --stdin --not --all --quiet <(list of objects) If the client repository has many refs, this command can be slow, regardless of the nature of the server repository or what is being fetched. A profiler reveals that most of the time is spent in setup_revisions() (approx. 60/63), and of the time spent in setup_revisions(), most of it is spent in parse_object() (approx. 49/60). This is because setup_revisions() parses the target of every ref (from "--all"), and parse_object() reads the buffer of the object. Reading the buffer is unnecessary if the repository has a commit graph and if the ref points to a commit (which is typically the case). This patch uses the commit graph wherever possible; on my computer, when I run the above command with a list of 1 object on a many-ref repository, I get a speedup from 1.8s to 1.0s. Another way to accomplish this effect would be to modify parse_object() to use the commit graph if possible; however, I did not want to change parse_object()'s current behavior of always checking the object signature of the returned object. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	ec36c42a63	Indent code with TABs We indent with TABs and sometimes for fine alignment, TABs followed by spaces, but never all spaces (unless the indentation is less than 8 columns). Indenting with spaces slips through in some places. Fix them. Imported code and compat/ are left alone on purpose. The former should remain as close as upstream as possible. The latter pretty much has separate maintainers, it's up to them to decide. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Matthew DeVore	bbcde41a70	revision.c: put promisor option in specialized struct Put the allow_exclude_promisor_objects flag in setup_revision_opt. When it was in rev_info, it was unclear when it was used, since rev_info is passed to functions that don't use the flag. This resulted in unnecessary setting of the flag in prune.c, so fix that as well. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Matthew DeVore	4cf67869b2	list-objects.c: don't segfault for missing cmdline objects When a command is invoked with both --exclude-promisor-objects, --objects-edge-aggressive, and a missing object on the command line, the rev_info.cmdline array could get a NULL pointer for the value of an 'item' field. Prevent dereferencing of a NULL pointer in that situation. Properly handle --ignore-missing. If it is not passed, die when an object is missing. Otherwise, just silently ignore it. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	67022e0214	tree-walk.c: make tree_entry_interesting() take an index In order to support :(attr) when matching pathspec on a tree, tree_entry_interesting() needs to take an index (because git_check_attr() needs it). This is the preparation step for it. This also makes it clearer what index we fall back to when looking up attributes during an unpack-trees operation: the source index. This also fixes revs->pruning.repo initialization that should have been done in `2abf350385` (revision.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index - 2018-09-21). Without it, skip_uninteresting() will dereference a NULL pointer through this call chain get_revision(revs) get_revision_internal get_revision_1 try_to_simplify_commit rev_compare_tree diff_tree_oid(..., &revs->pruning) ll_diff_tree_oid diff_tree_paths ll_diff_tree skip_uninteresting Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Jeff King	b4cfcde4db	rev-list: handle flags for --indexed-objects When a traversal sees the --indexed-objects option, it adds all blobs and valid cache-trees from the index to the traversal using add_index_objects_to_pending(). But that function totally ignores its flags parameter! That means that doing: git rev-list --objects --indexed-objects and git rev-list --objects --not --indexed-objects produce the same output, because we ignore the UNINTERESTING flag when walking the index in the second example. Nobody noticed because this feature was added as a way for tools like repack to increase their coverage of reachable objects, meaning it would only be used like the first example above. But since it's user facing (and because the documentation describes it "as if the objects are listed on the command line"), we should make sure the negative case behaves sensibly. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	b45424181e	revision.c: generation-based topo-order algorithm The current --topo-order algorithm requires walking all reachable commits up front, topo-sorting them, all before outputting the first value. This patch introduces a new algorithm which uses stored generation numbers to incrementally walk in topo-order, outputting commits as we go. This can dramatically reduce the computation time to write a fixed number of commits, such as when limiting with "-n <N>" or filling the first page of a pager. When running a command like 'git rev-list --topo-order HEAD', Git performed the following steps: 1. Run limit_list(), which parses all reachable commits, adds them to a linked list, and distributes UNINTERESTING flags. If all unprocessed commits are UNINTERESTING, then it may terminate without walking all reachable commits. This does not occur if we do not specify UNINTERESTING commits. 2. Run sort_in_topological_order(), which is an implementation of Kahn's algorithm. It first iterates through the entire set of important commits and computes the in-degree of each (plus one, as we use 'zero' as a special value here). Then, we walk the commits in priority order, adding them to the priority queue if and only if their in-degree is one. As we remove commits from this priority queue, we decrement the in-degree of their parents. 3. While we are peeling commits for output, get_revision_1() uses pop_commit on the full list of commits computed by sort_in_topological_order(). In the new algorithm, these three steps correspond to three different commit walks. We run these walks simultaneously, and advance each only as far as necessary to satisfy the requirements of the 'higher order' walk. We know when we can pause each walk by using generation numbers from the commit- graph feature. Recall that the generation number of a commit satisfies: * If the commit has at least one parent, then the generation number is one more than the maximum generation number among its parents. * If the commit has no parent, then the generation number is one. There are two special generation numbers: * GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY: this value is 0xffffffff and indicates that the commit is not stored in the commit-graph and the generation number was not previously calculated. * GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO: this value (0) is a special indicator to say that the commit-graph was generated by a version of Git that does not compute generation numbers (such as v2.18.0). Since we use generation_numbers_enabled() before using the new algorithm, we do not need to worry about GENERATION_NUMBER_ZERO. However, the existence of GENERATION_NUMBER_INFINITY implies the following weaker statement than the usual we expect from generation numbers: If A and B are commits with generation numbers gen(A) and gen(B) and gen(A) < gen(B), then A cannot reach B. Thus, we will walk in each of our stages until the "maximum unexpanded generation number" is strictly lower than the generation number of a commit we are about to use. The walks are as follows: 1. EXPLORE: using the explore_queue priority queue (ordered by maximizing the generation number), parse each reachable commit until all commits in the queue have generation number strictly lower than needed. During this walk, update the UNINTERESTING flags as necessary. 2. INDEGREE: using the indegree_queue priority queue (ordered by maximizing the generation number), add one to the in- degree of each parent for each commit that is walked. Since we walk in order of decreasing generation number, we know that discovering an in-degree value of 0 means the value for that commit was not initialized, so should be initialized to two. (Recall that in-degree value "1" is what we use to say a commit is ready for output.) As we iterate the parents of a commit during this walk, ensure the EXPLORE walk has walked beyond their generation numbers. 3. TOPO: using the topo_queue priority queue (ordered based on the sort_order given, which could be commit-date, author- date, or typical topo-order which treats the queue as a LIFO stack), remove a commit from the queue and decrement the in-degree of each parent. If a parent has an in-degree of one, then we add it to the topo_queue. Before we decrement the in-degree, however, ensure the INDEGREE walk has walked beyond that generation number. The implementations of these walks are in the following methods: * explore_walk_step and explore_to_depth * indegree_walk_step and compute_indegrees_to_depth * next_topo_commit and expand_topo_walk These methods have some patterns that may seem strange at first, but they are probably carry-overs from their equivalents in limit_list and sort_in_topological_order. One thing that is missing from this implementation is a proper way to stop walking when the entire queue is UNINTERESTING, so this implementation is not enabled by comparisions, such as in 'git rev-list --topo-order A..B'. This can be updated in the future. In my local testing, I used the following Git commands on the Linux repository in three modes: HEAD~1 with no commit-graph, HEAD~1 with a commit-graph, and HEAD with a commit-graph. This allows comparing the benefits we get from parsing commits from the commit-graph and then again the benefits we get by restricting the set of commits we walk. Test: git rev-list --topo-order -100 HEAD HEAD~1, no commit-graph: 6.80 s HEAD~1, w/ commit-graph: 0.77 s HEAD, w/ commit-graph: 0.02 s Test: git rev-list --topo-order -100 HEAD -- tools HEAD~1, no commit-graph: 9.63 s HEAD~1, w/ commit-graph: 6.06 s HEAD, w/ commit-graph: 0.06 s This speedup is due to a few things. First, the new generation- number-enabled algorithm walks commits on order of the number of results output (subject to some branching structure expectations). Since we limit to 100 results, we are running a query similar to filling a single page of results. Second, when specifying a path, we must parse the root tree object for each commit we walk. The previous benefits from the commit-graph are entirely from reading the commit-graph instead of parsing commits. Since we need to parse trees for the same number of commits as before, we slow down significantly from the non-path-based query. For the test above, I specifically selected a path that is changed frequently, including by merge commits. A less-frequently-changed path (such as 'README') has similar end-to-end time since we need to walk the same number of commits (before determining we do not have 100 hits). However, get the benefit that the output is presented to the user as it is discovered, much the same as a normal 'git log' command (no '--topo-order'). This is an improved user experience, even if the command has the same runtime. Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	5284fc5cc9	commit/revisions: bookkeeping before refactoring There are a few things that need to move around a little before making a big refactoring in the topo-order logic: 1. We need access to record_author_date() and compare_commits_by_author_date() in revision.c. These are used currently by sort_in_topological_order() in commit.c. 2. Moving these methods to commit.h requires adding an author_date_slab declaration to commit.h. Consumers will need their own implementation. 3. The add_parents_to_list() method in revision.c performs logic around the UNINTERESTING flag and other special cases depending on the struct rev_info. Allow this method to ignore a NULL 'list' parameter, as we will not be populating the list for our walk. Also rename the method to the slightly more generic name process_parents() to make clear that this method does more than add to a list (and no list is required anymore). Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	f0d9cc4196	revision.c: begin refactoring --topo-order logic When running 'git rev-list --topo-order' and its kin, the topo_order setting in struct rev_info implies the limited setting. This means that the following things happen during prepare_revision_walk(): * revs->limited implies we run limit_list() to walk the entire reachable set. There are some short-cuts here, such as if we perform a range query like 'git rev-list COMPARE..HEAD' and we can stop limit_list() when all queued commits are uninteresting. * revs->topo_order implies we run sort_in_topological_order(). See the implementation of that method in commit.c. It implies that the full set of commits to order is in the given commit_list. These two methods imply that a 'git rev-list --topo-order HEAD' command must walk the entire reachable set of commits _twice_ before returning a single result. If we have a commit-graph file with generation numbers computed, then there is a better way. This patch introduces some necessary logic redirection when we are in this situation. In v2.18.0, the commit-graph file contains zero-valued bytes in the positions where the generation number is stored in v2.19.0 and later. Thus, we use generation_numbers_enabled() to check if the commit-graph is available and has non-zero generation numbers. When setting revs->limited only because revs->topo_order is true, only do so if generation numbers are not available. There is no reason to use the new logic as it will behave similarly when all generation numbers are INFINITY or ZERO. In prepare_revision_walk(), if we have revs->topo_order but not revs->limited, then we trigger the new logic. It breaks the logic into three pieces, to fit with the existing framework: 1. init_topo_walk() fills a new struct topo_walk_info in the rev_info struct. We use the presence of this struct as a signal to use the new methods during our walk. In this patch, this method simply calls limit_list() and sort_in_topological_order(). In the future, this method will set up a new data structure to perform that logic in-line. 2. next_topo_commit() provides get_revision_1() with the next topo- ordered commit in the list. Currently, this simply pops the commit from revs->commits. 3. expand_topo_walk() provides get_revision_1() with a way to signal walking beyond the latest commit. Currently, this calls add_parents_to_list() exactly like the old logic. While this commit presents method redirection for performing the exact same logic as before, it allows the next commit to focus only on the new logic. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Matthew DeVore	669b1d2aae	exclude-promisor-objects: declare when option is allowed The --exclude-promisor-objects option causes some funny behavior in at least two commands: log and blame. It causes a BUG crash: $ git log --exclude-promisor-objects BUG: revision.c:2143: exclude_promisor_objects can only be used when fetch_if_missing is 0 Aborted [134] Fix this such that the option is treated like any other unknown option. The commands that must support it are limited, so declare in those commands that the flag is supported. In particular: pack-objects prune rev-list The commands were found by searching for logic which parses --exclude-promisor-objects outside of revision.c. Extra logic outside of revision.c is needed because fetch_if_missing must be turned on before revision.c sees the option or it will BUG-crash. The above list is supported by the fact that no other command is introspectively invoked by another command passing --exclude-promisor-object. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	ab3e1f78ae	revision.c: better error reporting on ref from different worktrees Make use of the new ref aliases to pass refs from another worktree around and access them from the current ref store instead. This does not change any functionality, but when a problem arises, we would like the reported messages to mention full ref aliases, like this: fatal: bad object worktrees/ztemp/HEAD warning: reflog of 'main-worktree/HEAD' references pruned commits instead of fatal: bad object HEAD warning: reflog of 'HEAD' references pruned commits which does not really tell where the refs are from. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	061e420a4d	revision.c: correct a parameter name This function is a callback of for_each_reflog() which will pass a ref name as the first argument, not a path (to a reflog file). Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Matthew DeVore	99c9aa9579	revision: mark non-user-given objects instead Currently, list-objects.c incorrectly treats all root trees of commits as USER_GIVEN. Also, it would be easier to mark objects that are non-user-given instead of user-given, since the places in the code where we access an object through a reference are more obvious than the places where we access an object that was given by the user. Resolve these two problems by introducing a flag NOT_USER_GIVEN that marks blobs and trees that are non-user-given, replacing USER_GIVEN. (Only blobs and trees are marked because this mark is only used when filtering objects, and filtering of other types of objects is not supported yet.) This fixes a bug in that git rev-list behaved differently from git pack-objects. pack-objects would not filter objects given explicitly on the command line and rev-list would filter. This was because the two commands used a different function to add objects to the rev_info struct. This seems to have been an oversight, and pack-objects has the correct behavior, so I added a test to make sure that rev-list now behaves properly. Signed-off-by: Matthew DeVore <matvore@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	b3c7eef9b0	revision.c: reduce implicit dependency the_repository Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	2abf350385	revision.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	a7edadda59	patch-ids.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	e675765235	diff.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index A new variant repo_diff_setup() is added that takes 'struct repository *' and diff_setup() becomes a thin macro around it that is protected by NO_THE_REPOSITORY_COMPATIBILITY_MACROS, similar to NO_THE_INDEX_.... The plan is these macros will always be defined for all library files and the macros are only accessible in builtin/ Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	38bbc2ea39	grep.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Jeff King	4a7e27e957	convert "oidcmp() == 0" to oideq() Using the more restrictive oideq() should, in the long run, give the compiler more opportunities to optimize these callsites. For now, this conversion should be a complete noop with respect to the generated code. The result is also perhaps a little more readable, as it avoids the "zero is equal" idiom. Since it's so prevalent in C, I think seasoned programmers tend not to even notice it anymore, but it can sometimes make for awkward double negations (e.g., we can drop a few !!oidcmp() instances here). This patch was generated almost entirely by the included coccinelle patch. This mechanical conversion should be completely safe, because we check explicitly for cases where oidcmp() is compared to 0, which is what oideq() is doing under the hood. Note that we don't have to catch "!oidcmp()" separately; coccinelle's standard isomorphisms make sure the two are treated equivalently. I say "almost" because I did hand-edit the coccinelle output to fix up a few style violations (it mostly keeps the original formatting, but sometimes unwraps long lines). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	a12cbe23ef	rev-list: make empty --stdin not an error When we originally did the series that contains `7ba826290a` (revision: add rev_input_given flag, 2017-08-02) the intent was that "git rev-list --stdin </dev/null" would similarly become a successful noop. However, an attempt at the time to do that did not work[1]. The problem is that rev_input_given serves two roles: - it tells rev-list.c that it should not error out - it tells revision.c that it should not have the "default" ref kick (e.g., "HEAD" in "git log") We want to trigger the former, but not the latter. This is technically possible with a single flag, if we set the flag only after revision.c's revs->def check. But this introduces a rather subtle ordering dependency. Instead, let's keep two flags: one to denote when we got actual input (which triggers both roles) and one for when we read stdin (which triggers only the first). This does mean a caller interested in the first role has to check both flags, but there's only one such caller. And any future callers might want to make the distinction anyway (e.g., if they care less about erroring out, and more about whether revision.c soaked up our stdin). In fact, we already keep such a flag internally in revision.c for this purpose, so this is really just exposing that to the caller (and the old function-local flag can go away in favor of our new one). [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20170802223416.gwiezhbuxbdmbjzx@sigill.intra.peff.net/ Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	6d2df284e7	dir.c: remove an implicit dependency on the_index in pathspec code Make the match_patchspec API and friends take an index_state instead of assuming the_index in dir.c. All external call sites are converted blindly to keep the patch simple and retain current behavior. Individual call sites may receive further updates to use the right index instead of the_index. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Derrick Stolee	6404355657	commit.h: remove method declarations These methods are now declared in commit-reach.h. Remove them from commit.h and add new include statements in all files that require these declarations. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jonathan Tan	dc0a13f681	revision: tolerate promised targets of tags In handle_commit(), it is fatal for an annotated tag to point to a non-existent object. --exclude-promisor-objects should relax this rule and allow non-existent objects that are promisor objects, but this is not the case. Update handle_commit() to tolerate this situation. This was observed when cloning from a repository with an annotated tag pointing to a blob. The test included in this patch demonstrates this case. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jonathan Tan	a0c9016abd	upload-pack: send refs' objects despite "filter" A filter line in a request to upload-pack filters out objects regardless of whether they are directly referenced by a "want" line or not. This means that cloning with "--filter=blob:none" (or another filter that excludes blobs) from a repository with at least one ref pointing to a blob (for example, the Git repository itself) results in output like the following: error: missing object referenced by 'refs/tags/junio-gpg-pub' and if that particular blob is not referenced by a fetched tree, the resulting clone fails fsck because there is no object from the remote to vouch that the missing object is a promisor object. Update both the protocol and the upload-pack implementation to include all explicitly specified "want" objects in the packfile regardless of the filter specification. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	2122f6754c	commit: add repository argument to lookup_commit_reference Add a repository argument to allow callers of lookup_commit_reference to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	f86bcc7b2c	tree: add repository argument to lookup_tree Add a repository argument to allow the callers of lookup_tree to be more specific about which repository to act on. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	da14a7ff99	blob: add repository argument to lookup_blob Add a repository argument to allow the callers of lookup_blob to be more specific about which repository to act on. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	109cd76dd3	object: add repository argument to parse_object Add a repository argument to allow the callers of parse_object to be more specific about which repository to act on. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	87be252333	revision.c: use commit-slab for show_source Instead of relying on commit->util to store the source string, let the user provide a commit-slab to store the source strings in. It's done so that commit->util can be removed. See more explanation in the commit that removes commit->util. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	cbd53a2193	object-store: move object access functions to object-store.h This should make these functions easier to find and cache.h less overwhelming to read. In particular, this moves: - read_object_file - oid_object_info - write_object_file As a result, most of the codebase needs to #include object-store.h. In this patch the #include is only added to files that would fail to compile otherwise. It would be better to #include wherever identifiers from the header are used. That can happen later when we have better tooling for it. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	8702b30fd7	mark_parents_uninteresting(): avoid most allocation Commit `941ba8db57` (Eliminate recursion in setting/clearing marks in commit list, 2012-01-14) used a clever double-loop to avoid allocations for single-parent chains of history. However, it did so only when following parents of parents (which was an uncommon case), and _always_ incurred at least one allocation to populate the list of pending parents in the first place. We can turn this into zero-allocation in the common case by iterating directly over the initial parent list, and then following up on any pending items we might have discovered. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	43fc643b75	mark_parents_uninteresting(): replace list with stack The mark_parents_uninteresting() function uses two loops: an outer one to process our queue of pending parents, and an inner one to process first-parent chains. This is a clever optimization from `941ba8db57` (Eliminate recursion in setting/clearing marks in commit list, 2012-01-14) to limit the number of linked-list allocations when following single-parent chains. Unfortunately, this makes the result a little hard to read. Let's replace the list with a stack. Then we don't have to worry about doing this double-loop optimization, as we'll just reuse the top element of the stack as we pop/push. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	577dd0d29b	mark_parents_uninteresting(): drop missing object check We allow UNINTERESTING objects in a traversal to be unavailable. As part of this, mark_parents_uninteresting() checks whether we have a particular uninteresting parent; if not, we will mark it as "parsed" so that later code skips it. This code is redundant and even a little bit harmful, so let's drop it. It's redundant because when our parse_object() call in add_parents_to_list() fails, we already quietly skip UNINTERESTING parents. This redundancy is a historical artifact. The mark_parents_uninteresting() protection is from `454fbbcde3` (git-rev-list: allow missing objects when the parent is marked UNINTERESTING, 2005-07-10). Much later, `aeeae1b771` (revision traversal: allow UNINTERESTING objects to be missing, 2009-01-27) covered more cases by making the actual parse more gentle. As an aside, even if this weren't redundant, it would be insufficient. The gentle parsing handles both missing and corrupted objects, whereas the has_object_file() check we're getting rid of covers only missing ones. And the code we're dropping is harmful for two reasons: 1. We spend extra time on the object lookup, even though we don't actually need the information at this point (and will just repeat that lookup later when we parse for the common case that we _do_ have the object). 2. It "lies" about the commit by setting the parsed flag, even though we didn't load any useful data into the struct. This shouldn't matter for the UNINTERESTING case, but we may later clear our flags and do another traversal in the same process. While pretty unlikely, it's possible that we could then look at the same commit without the UNINTERESTING flag, in which case we'd produce the wrong result (we'd think it's a commit with no parents, when in fact we should probably die due to the missing object). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	a5411df0d9	mark_tree_contents_uninteresting(): drop missing object check It's generally acceptable for UNINTERESTING objects in a traversal to be unavailable (e.g., see `aeeae1b771`). When marking trees UNINTERESTING, we access the object database twice: once to check if the object is missing (and return quietly if it is), and then again to actually parse it. We can instead just try to parse; if that fails, we can then return quietly. That halves the effort we spend on locating the object. Note that this isn't _exactly_ the same as the original behavior, as the parse failure could be due to other problems than a missing object: it could be corrupted, in which case the original code would have died. But the new behavior is arguably better, as it covers the object being unavailable for any reason. We'll also still issue a warning to stderr in such a case. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago

1 2 3 4 5 ...

758 Commits (49b8133a9ece199a17db8bb2545202c6eac67485)