kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Alex Riesen	3015fa5846	Fix use of "perl -i" on Windows The perldiag(1) has following to say about this: "Can't do inplace edit without backup" (F) You're on a system such as MS-DOS that gets confused if you try reading from a deleted (but still opened) file. You have to say -i.bak, or some such. Signed-off-by: Alex Riesen <raa.lkml@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Bryan Donlan	f69e836fab	Fix tests breaking when checkout path contains shell metacharacters This fixes the remainder of the issues where the test script itself is at fault for failing when the git checkout path contains whitespace or other shell metacharacters. The majority of git svn tests used the idiom test_expect_success "title" "test script using $svnrepo" These were changed to have the test script in single-quotes: test_expect_success "title" 'test script using "$svnrepo"' which unfortunately makes the patch appear larger than it really is. One consequence of this change is that in the verbose test output the value of $svnrepo (and in some cases other variables, too) is no longer expanded, i.e. previously we saw * expecting success: test script using /path/to/git/t/trash/svnrepo but now it is: * expecting success: test script using "$svnrepo" Signed-off-by: Bryan Donlan <bdonlan@fushizen.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Junio C Hamano	41ac414ea2	Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test should succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Eric Wong	8d92f24852	t9106: fix a race condition that caused svn to miss modifications carbonated beverage noticed this test was occasionally failing. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>	17 years ago
Benoit Sigoure	c8cfa3e4a5	git-svn: prevent dcommitting if the index is dirty. dcommit uses rebase to sync the history with what has just been pushed to SVN. Trying to dcommit with a dirty index is troublesome for rebase, so now the user will get an error message if he attempts to dcommit with a dirty index. Signed-off-by: Benoit Sigoure <tsuna@lrde.epita.fr> Acked-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Eric Wong	c74d9acf20	git-svn: fix dcommit clobbering when committing a series of diffs Our revision number sent to SVN is set to the last revision we committed if we've made any previous commits in a dcommit invocation. Although our SVN Editor code uses the delta of two (old) trees to generate information to send upstream, it'll still send complete resultant files upstream; even if the tree they're based against is out-of-date. The combination of sending a file that does not include the latest changes, but set with a revision number of a commit we just made will cause SVN to accept the resultant file even if it was generated against an old tree. More trouble was caused when fixing this because we were rebasing uncessarily at times. We used git-diff-tree to check the imported SVN revision against our HEAD, not the last tree we committed to SVN. The unnecessary rebasing caused merge commits upstream to SVN to fail. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago