In particular, check that it's a symlink, and points to refs/heads/. We
depend on that these days not only for "git checkout", but also because
fsck and others only check for references in the .git/refs/
subdirectory, not things like HEAD itself.
If we're inside a checked out CVS repository, there is
no need to explicitly specify the module as it is
available in CVS/Repository.
Also read CVS/Root if it's available and -d is not specified.
Finally, explicitly pass root to cvsps as CVS/Root takes
precedence over CVSROOT.
Signed-off-by: Sven Verdoolaege <skimo@kotnet.org>
This implements show_pack_info() function used in verify-pack
command when -v flag is used to obtain something like
unpack-objects used to give when it was first written.
It shows the following for each non-deltified object found in
the pack:
SHA1 type size offset
For deltified objects, it shows this instead:
SHA1 type size offset depth base_sha1
In order to get the output in the order that appear in the pack
file for debugging purposes, you can do this:
$ git-verify-pack -v packfile | sort -n -k 4,4
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Nico pointed out that having verify_pack.c and verify-pack.c was
confusing. Rename verify_pack.c to pack-check.c as suggested,
and enhances the verification done quite a bit.
- Built-in sha1_file unpacking knows that a base object of a
deltified object _must_ be in the same pack, and takes
advantage of that fact.
- Earlier verify-pack command only checked the SHA1 sum for the
entire pack file and did not look into its contents. It now
checks everything idx file claims to have unpacks correctly.
- It now has a hook to give more detailed information for
objects contained in the pack under -v flag.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This teaches packed_delta_info() that it only needs to look at
the type of the base object to figure out both type and size of
a deltified object. This saves quite a many calls to inflate()
when dealing with a deep delta chain.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This makes the receiver always send a full list of valid refs, which
will allow us to do better packs, as well as handle creation of new
refs. Eventually. Right now we just moved the matching and enabled it.
So now you can do
git-send-pack host:path branch1 branch2
to only send branches "branch1" and "branch2".
A "old ref" of all zeroes is considered a "don't care" ref, and allows
us to say "write the new ref regardless of what the old ref contained
(or even if it existed at all)".
This allows (if git-send-pack were to do it) creating new refs, and
fixing up old ones.
This concludes this lesson. I've actually successfully sent an update
using the git-send-pack command.
Probably tons of work still to do, and nasty debugging, but it's now
actually potentially useful.
After unpacking the object pack successfully, we go through the list of
refs, and verify that they still contain their expected values. Then we
replace them with the new ones.
This patch removes an unnecessary sort from the t6001 testcase.
Sorts were previously necessary when testing non --merge-order cases
because the output order wasn't entirely deterministic unless commit
date was fixed.
However, commit dates are now fixed, so the need for a sort has
disappeared. So the sort has been removed.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This fix fixes a t/t6001 test case break that was hidden by a bug in the
test case infrastructure.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Junio discovered a problem where an actual test case break was hidden
because pipelines are not handled properly by the test infrastructure in
t6001.
This patch fixes the broken infrastructure (and demonstrates the break
explicitly).
A subsequent patch in this series will fix the test case so that it
doesn't fail.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This patch makes --merge-order produce the same list as git-rev-list
without --merge-order specified.
In particular, if the graph looks like this:
A
| B
|/
C
|
D
The both git-rev-list B ^A and git-rev-list --merge-order will produce B.
The unit tests have been changed to reflect the fact that the prune
points are now formally part of the start list that is used to perform
the --merge-order sort.
That is: git-rev-list --merge-order A ^D used to produce
= A
| C
It now produces:
^ A
| C
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Added a test case that shows that --merge-order doesn't produce the
correct result in the following case.
A
|
| B
|/
C
|
D
git-rev-list --merge-order A ^B should produce just A. Instead
it produces BCD.
A subsequent patch will fix this defect.
Signed-off-by: Jon Seymour <jon.seymour@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
It's not working yet, but it's at the point where I want to be able to
track my changes. The theory of operation is that this is the "remote"
side of a "git push". It can tell us what references the remote side
has, receives out reference update commands and a pack-file, and can
execute the unpacking command.
Now you can give git-rev-list tags, trees and blobs, and it will do the
proper reachability for them all. Knock wood.
Of course, you need the "--objects" flag to do anything but plain
commits.
We want to be able to just say "give a difference between these
objects", rather than limiting it to commits only. This isn't there
yet, but it sets things up to be a bit easier.
It now always read from standard input and rejects non-flag
arguments.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
It can no longer be as verbose, since it doesn't have a good way to
resolve deltas (now that it is purely streaming, it cannot seek around
to read the objects a delta is based on).
But it can check that the thing unpacks cleanly at least as far as pack
syntax goes - all the objects uncompress cleanly, and the pack has the
right final SHA1.
Linus Torvalds