When recursing submodules 'check_updates()' needs to have strict control
over the submodule-config subsystem to ensure that the gitmodules file
has been read before checking cache entries which are marked for
removal as well ensuring the proper gitmodules file is read before
updating cache entries.
Because of this let's not rely on callers of 'check_updates()' to read
the gitmodules file before calling 'check_updates()' and handle the
reading explicitly.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The 'submodule.update' config was historically used and respected by the
'submodule update' command because update handled a variety of different
ways it updated a submodule. As we begin teaching other commands about
submodules it makes more sense for the different settings of
'submodule.update' to be handled by the individual commands themselves
(checkout, rebase, merge, etc) so it shouldn't be respected by the
native checkout command.
Also remove the overlaying of the repository's config (via using
'submodule_config()') from the commands which use the unpack-trees
logic (checkout, read-tree, reset).
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a macro to be used when specifying the '.gitmodules' file and
convert any existing hard coded '.gitmodules' file strings to use the
new macro.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Stop including config.h by default in cache.h. Instead only include
config.h in those files which require use of the config system.
Signed-off-by: Brandon Williams <bmwill@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Make git checkout (and other unpack_tree operations) preserve the
untracked cache. This is valuable for two reasons:
1. Often, an unpack_tree operation will not touch large parts of the
working tree, and thus most of the untracked cache will continue to be
valid.
2. Even if the untracked cache were entirely invalidated by such an
operation, the user has signaled their intention to have such a cache,
and we don't want to throw it away.
[jes: backed out the watchman-specific parts]
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Peart <benpeart@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In case of a non-forced worktree update, the submodule movement is tested
in a dry run first, such that it doesn't matter if the actual update is
done via the force flag. However for correctness, we want to give the
flag as specified by the user. All callers have been inspected and updated
if needed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Teach traverse_trees_recursive() to not do redundant ODB
lookups when both directories refer to the same OID.
In operations such as read-tree and checkout, there will
likely be many peer directories that have the same OID when
the differences between the commits are relatively small.
In these cases we can avoid hitting the ODB multiple times
for the same OID.
This patch handles n=2 and n=3 cases and simply copies the
data rather than repeating the fill_tree_descriptor().
================
On the Windows repo (500K trees, 3.1M files, 450MB index),
this reduced the overall time by 0.75 seconds when cycling
between 2 commits with a single file difference.
(avg) before: 22.699
(avg) after: 21.955
===============
================
On Linux using p0006-read-tree-checkout.sh with linux.git:
Test HEAD^ HEAD
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
0006.2: read-tree br_base br_ballast (57994) 0.24(0.20+0.03) 0.24(0.22+0.01) +0.0%
0006.3: switch between br_base br_ballast (57994) 10.58(6.23+2.86) 10.67(5.94+2.87) +0.9%
0006.4: switch between br_ballast br_ballast_plus_1 (57994) 0.60(0.44+0.17) 0.57(0.44+0.14) -5.0%
0006.5: switch between aliases (57994) 0.59(0.48+0.13) 0.57(0.44+0.15) -3.4%
================
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hostetler <jeffhost@microsoft.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As the place holder in the error message is for multiple submodules,
we don't want to encapsulate the string place holder in single quotes.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a later patch we'll support submodule entries to be
in sync with the tree in working tree changing commands,
such as checkout or read-tree.
When a new submodule entry changes in the tree, we need to
check if there are conflicts (directory/file conflicts)
for the tree. Add this check for submodules to be
performed before the working tree is touched.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The check (which uses the old oid) is yet to be implemented, but this part
is just a refactor, so it can go separately first.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the future we want to support working tree operations within submodules,
e.g. "git checkout --recurse-submodules", which will update the submodule
to the commit as recorded in its superproject. In the submodule the
unpack-tree operation is carried out as usual, but the reporting to the
user needs to prefix any path with the superproject. The mechanism for
this is the super-prefix. (see 74866d757, git: make super-prefix option)
Add support for the super-prefix option for commands that unpack trees
by wrapping any path output in unpacking trees in the newly introduced
super_prefixed function. This new function prefixes any path with the
super-prefix if there is one. Assuming the submodule case doesn't happen
in the majority of the cases, we'd want to have a fast behavior for no
super prefix, i.e. no reallocation/copying, but just returning path.
Another aspect of introducing the `super_prefixed` function is to consider
who owns the memory and if this is the right place where the path gets
modified. As the super prefix ought to change the output behavior only and
not the actual unpack tree part, it is fine to be that late in the line.
As we get passed in 'const char *path', we cannot change the path itself,
which means in case of a super prefix we have to copy over the path.
We need two static buffers in that function as the error messages
contain at most two paths.
For testing purposes enable it in read-tree, which has no output
of paths other than an unpack-trees.c. These are all converted in
this patch.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes check_updates shorter and easier to understand.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The continue is the last statement in the loop, so not needed.
This situation arose in 700e66d66 (2010-07-30, unpack-trees: let
read-tree -u remove index entries outside sparse area) when statements
after the continue were removed.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The checkout state was introduced via 16da134b1f
(read-trees: refactor the unpack_trees() part, 2006-07-30). An attempt to
refactor the checkout state was done in b56aa5b268 (unpack-trees: pass
checkout state explicitly to check_updates(), 2016-09-13), but we can
go even further.
The `struct checkout state` is not used in unpack_trees apart from
initializing it, so move it into the function that makes use of it,
which is `check_updates`.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Reviewed-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Noticed-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com>
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Turner <dturner@twosigma.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a static initializer for struct checkout and use it throughout the
code base. It's shorter, avoids a memset(3) call and makes sure the
base_dir member is initialized to a valid (empty) string.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Add a parameter for the struct checkout variable to check_updates()
instead of using a static global variable. Passing it explicitly makes
object ownership and usage more easily apparent. And we get rid of a
static variable; those can be problematic in library-like code.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Convert struct cache_entry to use struct object_id by applying the
following semantic patch and the object_id transforms from contrib, plus
the actual change to the struct:
@@
struct cache_entry E1;
@@
- E1.sha1
+ E1.oid.hash
@@
struct cache_entry *E1;
@@
- E1->sha1
+ E1->oid.hash
Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of reusing the same set of message templates for checkout
and other actions and substituting the verb with "%s", prepare
separate message templates for each known action. That would make
it easier for translation into languages where the same verb may
conjugate differently depending on the message we are giving.
See gettext documentation for details:
http://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_node/Preparing-Strings.html
Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Mark strings seen by the user inside setup_unpack_trees_porcelain() and
display_error_msgs() functions for translation.
Signed-off-by: Vasco Almeida <vascomalmeida@sapo.pt>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
While unpacking trees (e.g. during git checkout), when we hit a cache
entry that's past and outside our path, we cut off iteration.
This provides about a 45% speedup on git checkout between master and
master^20000 on Twitter's monorepo. Speedup in general will depend on
repostitory structure, number of changes, and packfile packing
decisions.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In traverse_trees, we generate the complete traverse path for a
traverse_info. Later, in do_compare_entry, we used to go do a bunch
of work to compare the traverse_info to a cache_entry's name without
computing that path. But since we already have that path, we don't
need to do all that work. Instead, we can just put the generated
path into the traverse_info, and do the comparison more directly.
We copy the path because prune_traversal might mutate `base`. This
doesn't happen in any codepaths where do_compare_entry is called,
but it's better to be safe.
This makes git checkout much faster -- about 25% on Twitter's
monorepo. Deeper directory trees are likely to benefit more than
shallower ones.
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It's a common pattern to do:
foo = xmalloc(strlen(one) + strlen(two) + 1 + 1);
sprintf(foo, "%s %s", one, two);
(or possibly some variant with strcpy()s or a more
complicated length computation). We can switch these to use
xstrfmt, which is shorter, involves less error-prone manual
computation, and removes many sprintf and strcpy calls which
make it harder to audit the code for real buffer overflows.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When unpack-trees wants to know whether a path will
overwrite anything in the working tree, we use lstat() to
see if there is anything there. But if we are going to write
"foo/bar", we can't just lstat("foo/bar"); we need to look
for leading prefixes (e.g., "foo"). So we use the lstat cache
to find the length of the leading prefix, and copy the
filename up to that length into a temporary buffer (since
the original name is const, we cannot just stick a NUL in
it).
The copy we make goes into a PATH_MAX-sized buffer, which
will overflow if the prefix is longer than PATH_MAX. How
this happens is a little tricky, since in theory PATH_MAX is
the biggest path we will have read from the filesystem. But
this can happen if:
- the compiled-in PATH_MAX does not accurately reflect
what the filesystem is capable of
- the leading prefix is not _quite_ what is on disk; it
contains the next element from the name we are checking.
So if we want to write "aaa/bbb/ccc/ddd" and "aaa/bbb"
exists, the prefix of interest is "aaa/bbb/ccc". If
"aaa/bbb" approaches PATH_MAX, then "ccc" can overflow
it.
So this can be triggered, but it's hard to do. In
particular, you cannot just "git clone" a bogus repo. The
verify_absent checks happen before unpack-trees writes
anything to the filesystem, so there are never any leading
prefixes during the initial checkout, and the bug doesn't
trigger. And by definition, these files are larger than
PATH_MAX, so writing them will fail, and clone will
complain (though it may write a partial path, which will
cause a subsequent "git checkout" to hit the bug).
We can fix it by creating the temporary path on the heap.
The extra malloc overhead is not important, as we are
already making at least one stat() call (and probably more
for the prefix discovery).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because git_path uses a static buffer that is shared with
calls to git_path, mkpath, etc, it can be dangerous to
assign the result to a variable or pass it to a non-trivial
function. The value may change unexpectedly due to other
calls.
None of the cases changed here has a known bug, but they're
worth converting away from git_path because:
1. It's easy to use git_pathdup in these cases.
2. They use constructs (like assignment) that make it
hard to tell whether they're safe or not.
The extra malloc overhead should be trivial, as an
allocation should be an order of magnitude cheaper than a
system call (which we are clearly about to make, since we
are constructing a filename). The real cost is that we must
remember to free the result.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we unpack trees into an existing index, we discard the old
index and replace it with the new, merged index. Ensure that this
index has its cache-tree populated. This will make subsequent git
status and commit commands faster.
Signed-off-by: Brian Degenhardt <bmd@bmdhacks.com>
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Don't update files in the worktree from cache entries which are
flagged with CE_WT_REMOVE.
When a user does a sparse checkout, git removes files that are
marked with CE_WT_REMOVE (because they are out-of-scope for the
sparse checkout). If those files are also marked CE_UPDATE (for
instance, because they differ in the branch that is being checked
out and the outgoing branch), git would previously recreate them.
This patch prevents them from being recreated.
These erroneously-created files would also interfere with merges,
causing pre-merge revisions of out-of-scope files to appear in the
worktree.
apply_sparse_checkout() is the function where all "action"
manipulation (add, delete, update files..) for sparse checkout
occurs; it should not ask to delete and update both at the same
time.
Signed-off-by: Anatole Shaw <git-devel@omni.poc.net>
Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
Helped-by: Duy Nguyen <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Ideally we should implement untracked_cache_remove_from_index() and
untracked_cache_add_to_index() so that they update untracked cache
right away instead of invalidating it and wait for read_directory()
next time to deal with it. But that may need some more work in
unpack-trees.c. So stay simple as the first step.
The new call in add_index_entry_with_check() may look strange because
new calls usually stay close to cache_tree_invalidate_path(). We do it
a bit later than c_t_i_p() in this function because if it's about
replacing the entry with the same name, we don't care (but cache-tree
does).
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When unpack_trees tries to write an entry to the index,
add_index_entry may report an error to stderr, but we ignore
its return value. This leads to us returning a successful
exit code for an operation that partially failed. Let's make
sure to propagate this code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Most of the time the caller specifies to which destination variable
the resulting index_state should be assigned by passing a non-NULL
pointer in o->dst_index to receive that state, but for a caller that
gives a NULL o->dst_index, the resulting index simply leaked.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
twoway_merge() is missing an o->gently check in the case where a file
that needs to be modified is missing from the index but present in the
old and new trees. As a result, in this case 'git checkout -m' errors
out instead of trying to perform a merge.
Fix it by checking o->gently. While at it, inline the o->gently check
into reject_merge to prevent future call sites from making the same
mistake.
Noticed by code inspection. The test for the motivating case was
added by JC.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Match the predominant style in git by following K&R style for if/else
cascades. Documentation/CodingStyle from linux.git explains:
Note that the closing brace is empty on a line of its own, _except_ in
the cases where it is followed by a continuation of the same statement,
ie a "while" in a do-statement or an "else" in an if-statement, like
this:
if (x == y) {
..
} else if (x > y) {
...
} else {
....
}
Rationale: K&R.
Also, note that this brace-placement also minimizes the number of empty
(or almost empty) lines, without any loss of readability.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the 'if (current)' block of twoway_merge, we handle the boring
errors by checking if the entry from the old tree, current index, and
new tree are present, to get a pathname for the error message from one
of them:
if (oldtree)
return o->gently ? -1 : reject_merge(oldtree, o);
if (current)
return o->gently ? -1 : reject_merge(current, o);
if (newtree)
return o->gently ? -1 : reject_merge(newtree, o);
return -1;
Since this is guarded by 'if (current)', the second test is guaranteed
to succeed. Moreover, any of the three entries, if present, would
have the same path because there is no rename detection in this code
path. Even if some day in the future the entries' paths differ, the
'current' path used in the index and worktree would presumably be the
most recognizable for the end user.
Simplify by just using 'current'.
Noticed by coverity, Id:290002
Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <stefanbeller@gmail.com>
Improved-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We often represent our strings as a counted string, i.e. a pair of
the pointer to the beginning of the string and its length, and the
string may not be NUL terminated to that length.
To compare a pair of such counted strings, unpack-trees.c and
read-cache.c implement their own name_compare() functions
identically. In addition, the cache_name_compare() function in
read-cache.c is nearly identical. The only difference is when one
string is the prefix of the other string, in which case
name_compare() returns -1/+1 to show which one is longer, and
cache_name_compare() returns the difference of the lengths to show
the same information.
Unify these three functions by using the implementation from
cache_name_compare(). This does not make any difference to the
existing and future callers, as they must be paying attention only
to the sign of the returned value (and not the magnitude) because
the original implementations of these two functions return values
returned by memcmp(3) when the one string is not a prefix of the
other string, and the only thing memcmp(3) guarantees its callers is
the sign of the returned value, not the magnitude.
Signed-off-by: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In many parts of the code, we do an ugly and error-prone
malloc like:
const char *fmt = "something %s";
buf = xmalloc(strlen(foo) + 10 + 1);
sprintf(buf, fmt, foo);
This makes the code brittle, and if we ever get the
allocation wrong, is a potential heap overflow. Let's
instead favor xstrfmt, which handles the allocation
automatically, and makes the code shorter and more readable.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The large part of this patch just follows CE_ENTRY_CHANGED
marks. replace_index_entry() is updated to update
split_index->base->cache[] as well so base->cache[] does not reference
to a freed entry.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This split-index mode is designed to keep write cost proportional to
the number of changes the user has made, not the size of the work
tree. (Read cost is another matter, to be dealt separately.)
This mode stores index info in a pair of $GIT_DIR/index and
$GIT_DIR/sharedindex.<SHA-1>. sharedindex is large and unchanged over
time while "index" is smaller and updated often. Format details are in
index-format.txt, although not everything is implemented in this
patch.
Shared indexes are not automatically removed, because it's unclear if
the shared index is needed by any (even temporary) indexes by just
looking at it. After a while you'll collect stale shared indexes. The
good news is one shared index is useable for long, until
$GIT_DIR/index becomes too big and sluggish that the new shared index
must be created.
The safest way to clean shared indexes is to turn off split index
mode, so shared files are all garbage, delete them all, then turn on
split index mode again.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Also update SHA-1 after writing. If we do not do that, the second
read_index() will see "initialized" variable already set and not read
.git/index again, which is fine, except istate->sha1 now has a stale
value.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Other fill_stat_cache_info() is on new entries, which should set
CE_ENTRY_ADDED in cache_changed, so we're safe.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Brandon Williams