kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

15089 Commits

6 Branches

36 Tags

131 MiB

Tree: 31a92f6aa4

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Junio C Hamano	3af828634f	tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index" As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the results of what git command that is being tested has done. We would not know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the cute hack of "git diff --no-index". Rather use test_cmp for that purpose. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Shawn O. Pearce	41fa7d2eae	Teach git-fetch to exploit server side automatic tag following If the remote peer upload-pack process supports the include-tag protocol extension then we can avoid running a second fetch cycle on the client side by letting the server send us the annotated tags along with the objects it is packing for us. In the following graph we can now fetch both "tag1" and "tag2" on the same connection that we fetched "master" from the remote when we only have L available on the local side: T - tag1 S - tag2 / / L - o ------ o ------ B \ \ \ \ origin/master master The objects for "tag1" are implicitly downloaded without our direct knowledge. The existing "quickfetch" optimization within git-fetch discovers that tag1 is complete after the first connection and does not open a second connection. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago
Shawn O. Pearce	cf7f929a10	Teach git-fetch to grab a tag at the same time as a commit If the situation is the following on the remote and L is the common base between both sides: T - tag1 S - tag2 / / L - A - O - O - B \ \ origin/master master and we have decided to fetch "master" to acquire the range L..B we can also nab tag S at the same time during the first connection, as we can clearly see from the refs advertised by upload-pack that S^{} = B and master = B. Unfortunately we still cannot nab T at the same time as we are not able to see that T^{} will also be in the range implied by L..B. Such computations must be performed on the remote side (not yet supported) or on the client side as post-processing (the current behavior). This optimization is an extension of the previous one in that it helps on projects which tend to publish both a new commit and a new tag, then lay idle for a while before publishing anything else. Most followers are able to download both the new commit and the new tag in one connection, rather than two. git.git tends to follow such patterns with its roughly once-daily updates from Junio. A protocol extension and additional server side logic would be necessary to also ensure T is grabbed on the first connection. Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Junio C Hamano

3af828634f

tests: do not use implicit "git diff --no-index"

As a general principle, we should not use "git diff" to validate the
results of what git command that is being tested has done.  We would not
know if we are testing the command in question, or locating a bug in the
cute hack of "git diff --no-index".

Rather use test_cmp for that purpose.

Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

17 years ago

Shawn O. Pearce

41fa7d2eae

Teach git-fetch to exploit server side automatic tag following

If the remote peer upload-pack process supports the include-tag
protocol extension then we can avoid running a second fetch cycle
on the client side by letting the server send us the annotated tags
along with the objects it is packing for us.  In the following graph
we can now fetch both "tag1" and "tag2" on the same connection that
we fetched "master" from the remote when we only have L available
on the local side:

         T - tag1          S - tag2
        /                 /
   L - o ------ o ------ B
    \                     \
     \                     \
      origin/master         master

The objects for "tag1" are implicitly downloaded without our direct
knowledge.  The existing "quickfetch" optimization within git-fetch
discovers that tag1 is complete after the first connection and does
not open a second connection.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

17 years ago

Shawn O. Pearce

cf7f929a10

Teach git-fetch to grab a tag at the same time as a commit

If the situation is the following on the remote and L is the common
base between both sides:

          T - tag1    S - tag2
         /           /
    L - A - O - O - B
     \               \
      origin/master   master

and we have decided to fetch "master" to acquire the range L..B we
can also nab tag S at the same time during the first connection,
as we can clearly see from the refs advertised by upload-pack that
S^{} = B and master = B.

Unfortunately we still cannot nab T at the same time as we are not
able to see that T^{} will also be in the range implied by L..B.
Such computations must be performed on the remote side (not yet
supported) or on the client side as post-processing (the current
behavior).

This optimization is an extension of the previous one in that it
helps on projects which tend to publish both a new commit and a
new tag, then lay idle for a while before publishing anything else.
Most followers are able to download both the new commit and the new
tag in one connection, rather than two.  git.git tends to follow
such patterns with its roughly once-daily updates from Junio.

A protocol extension and additional server side logic would be
necessary to also ensure T is grabbed on the first connection.

Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>

17 years ago

3 Commits (31a92f6aa47732e93f6685b8d1fd1ac09c1fec44)