kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
SZEDER Gábor	1df15f8dee	commit-slab: add a function to deep free entries on the slab clear_##slabname() frees only the memory allocated for a commit slab itself, but entries in the commit slab might own additional memory outside the slab that should be freed as well. We already have (at least) one such commit slab, and this patch series is about to add one more. To free all additional memory owned by entries on the commit slab the user of such a slab could iterate over all commits it knows about, peek whether there is a valid entry associated with each commit, and free the additional memory, if any. Or it could rely on intimate knowledge about the internals of the commit slab implementation, and could itself iterate directly through all entries in the slab, and free the additional memory. Or it could just leak the additional memory... Introduce deep_clear_##slabname() to allow releasing memory owned by commit slab entries by invoking the 'void free_fn(elemtype *ptr)' function specified as parameter for each entry in the slab. Use it in get_shallow_commits() in 'shallow.c' to replace an open-coded iteration over a commit slab's entries. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Taylor Blau	cac4b8e22e	shallow: use struct 'shallow_lock' for additional safety In previous patches, the functions 'commit_shallow_file' and 'rollback_shallow_file' were introduced to reset the shallowness validity checks on a repository after potentially modifying '.git/shallow'. These functions can be made safer by wrapping the 'struct lockfile *' in a new type, 'shallow_lock', so that they cannot be called with a raw lock (and potentially misused by other code that happens to possess a lockfile, but has nothing to do with shallowness). This patch introduces that type as a thin wrapper around 'struct lockfile', and updates the two aforementioned functions and their callers to use it. Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Helped-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Taylor Blau	120ad2b0f1	shallow: extract a header file for shallow-related functions There are many functions in commit.h that are more related to shallow repositories than they are to any sort of generic commit machinery. Likely this began when there were only a few shallow-related functions, and commit.h seemed a reasonable enough place to put them. But, now there are a good number of shallow-related functions, and placing them all in 'commit.h' doesn't make sense. This patch extracts a 'shallow.h', which takes all of the declarations from 'commit.h' for functions which already exist in 'shallow.c'. We will bring the remaining shallow-related functions defined in 'commit.c' in a subsequent patch. For now, move only the ones that already are implemented in 'shallow.c', and update the necessary includes. Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Taylor Blau	37b9dcabfc	shallow.c: use '{commit,rollback}_shallow_file' In `bd0b42aed3` (fetch-pack: do not take shallow lock unnecessarily, 2019-01-10), the author noted that 'is_repository_shallow' produces visible side-effect(s) by setting 'is_shallow' and 'shallow_stat'. This is a problem for e.g., fetching with '--update-shallow' in a shallow repository with 'fetch.writeCommitGraph' enabled, since the update to '.git/shallow' will cause Git to think that the repository isn't shallow when it is, thereby circumventing the commit-graph compatibility check. This causes problems in shallow repositories with at least shallow refs that have at least one ancestor (since the client won't have those objects, and therefore can't take the reachability closure over commits when writing a commit-graph). Address this by introducing thin wrappers over 'commit_lock_file' and 'rollback_lock_file' for use specifically when the lock is held over '.git/shallow'. These wrappers (appropriately called 'commit_shallow_file' and 'rollback_shallow_file') call into their respective functions in 'lockfile.h', but additionally reset validity checks used by the shallow machinery. Replace each instance of 'commit_lock_file' and 'rollback_lock_file' with 'commit_shallow_file' and 'rollback_shallow_file' when the lock being held is over the '.git/shallow' file. As a result, 'prune_shallow' can now only be called once (since 'check_shallow_file_for_update' will die after calling 'reset_repository_shallow'). But, this is OK since we only call 'prune_shallow' at most once per process. Helped-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Helped-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Taylor Blau <me@ttaylorr.com> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Jeff King	fe299ec5ae	oid_array: rename source file from sha1-array We renamed the actual data structure in `910650d2f8` (Rename sha1_array to oid_array, 2017-03-31), but the file is still called sha1-array. Besides being slightly confusing, it makes it more annoying to grep for leftover occurrences of "sha1" in various files, because the header is included in so many places. Let's complete the transition by renaming the source and header files (and fixing up a few comment references). I kept the "-" in the name, as that seems to be our style; cf. `fc1395f4a4` (sha1_file.c: rename to use dash in file name, 2018-04-10). We also have oidmap.h and oidset.h without any punctuation, but those are "struct oidmap" and "struct oidset" in the code. We _could_ make this "oidarray" to match, but somehow it looks uglier to me because of the length of "array" (plus it would be a very invasive patch for little gain). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
René Scharfe	2fe44394c8	treewide: remove duplicate #include directives Found with "git grep '^#include ' '*.c' \| sort \| uniq -d". Signed-off-by: René Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Ali Utku Selen	ddb3c856f3	shallow.c: don't free unallocated slabs Fix possible segfault when cloning a submodule shallow. Signed-off-by: Ali Utku Selen <auselen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	34e7771bc6	Use the right 'struct repository' instead of the_repository There are a couple of places where 'struct repository' is already passed around, but the_repository is still used. Use the right repo. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Jonathan Tan	bd0b42aed3	fetch-pack: do not take shallow lock unnecessarily When fetching using protocol v2, the remote may send a "shallow-info" section if the client is shallow. If so, Git as the client currently takes the shallow file lock, even if the "shallow-info" section is empty. This is not a problem except that Git does not support taking the shallow file lock after modifying the shallow file, because is_repository_shallow() stores information that is never cleared. And this take-after-modify occurs when Git does a tag-following fetch from a shallow repository on a transport that does not support tag following (since in this case, 2 fetches are performed). To solve this issue, take the shallow file lock (and perform all other shallow processing) only if the "shallow-info" section is non-empty; otherwise, behave as if it were empty. A full solution (probably, ensuring that any action of committing shallow file locks also includes clearing the information stored by is_repository_shallow()) would solve the issue without need for this patch, but this patch is independently useful (as an optimization to prevent writing a file in an unnecessary case), hence why I wrote it. I have included a NEEDSWORK outlining the full solution. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Tan <jonathantanmy@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	2588f6ed8b	shallow: offer to prune only non-existing entries The `prune_shallow()` function wants a full reachability check to be completed before it goes to work, to ensure that all unreachable entries are removed from the shallow file. However, in the upcoming patch we do not even want to go that far. We really only need to remove entries corresponding to pruned commits, i.e. to commits that no longer exist. Let's support that use case. Rather than extending the signature of `prune_shallow()` to accept another Boolean, let's turn it into a bit field and declare constants, for readability. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	2abf350385	revision.c: remove implicit dependency on the_index Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Derrick Stolee	6404355657	commit.h: remove method declarations These methods are now declared in commit-reach.h. Remove them from commit.h and add new include statements in all files that require these declarations. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	a74093da5e	tag: add repository argument to deref_tag Add a repository argument to allow the callers of deref_tag to be more specific about which repository to act on. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	c1f5eb4962	commit: add repository argument to lookup_commit Add a repository argument to allow callers of lookup_commit to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	21e1ee8f4f	commit: add repository argument to lookup_commit_reference_gently Add a repository argument to allow callers of lookup_commit_reference_gently to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	e34de73c56	upload-pack: reject shallow requests that would return nothing Shallow clones with --shallow-since or --shalow-exclude work by running rev-list to get all reachable commits, then draw a boundary between reachable and unreachable and send "shallow" requests based on that. The code does miss one corner case: if rev-list returns nothing, we'll have no border and we'll send no shallow requests back to the client (i.e. no history cuts). This essentially means a full clone (or a full branch if the client requests just one branch). One example is the oldest commit is older than what is specified by --shallow-since. To avoid this, if rev-list returns nothing, we abort the clone/fetch. The user could adjust their request (e.g. --shallow-since further back in the past) and retry. Another possible option for this case is to fall back to a default depth (like depth 1). But I don't like too much magic that way because we may return something unexpected to the user. If they request "history since 2008" and we return a single depth at 2000, that might break stuff for them. It is better to tell them that something is wrong and let them take the best course of action. Note that we need to die() in get_shallow_commits_by_rev_list() instead of just checking for empty result from its caller deepen_by_rev_list() and handling the error there. The reason is, empty result could be a valid case: if you have commits in year 2013 and you request --shallow-since=year.2000 then you should get a full clone (i.e. empty result). Reported-by: Andreas Krey <a.krey@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	58dbe58faa	shallow.c: use commit-slab for commit depth instead of commit->util It's done so that commit->util can be removed. See more explanation in the commit that removes commit->util. While at there, plug a leak for keeping track of depth in this code. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	eee4502baa	shallow: migrate shallow information into the object parser We need to convert the shallow functions all at the same time as we move the data structures they operate on into the repository. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	102de880d2	path.c: migrate global git_path_* to take a repository argument Migrate all git_path_* functions that are defined in path.c to take a repository argument. Unlike other patches in this series, do not use the #define trick, as we rewrite the whole function, which is rather small. This doesn't migrate all the functions, as other builtins have their own local path functions defined using GIT_PATH_FUNC. So keep that macro around to serve the other locations. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	c88134870e	shallow: add repository argument to is_repository_shallow Add a repository argument to allow callers of is_repository_shallow to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	22bdc7c4ff	shallow: add repository argument to check_shallow_file_for_update Add a repository argument to allow callers of check_shallow_file_for_update to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	19143f139d	shallow: add repository argument to register_shallow Add a repository argument to allow callers of register_shallow to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	6a2df51c84	shallow: add repository argument to set_alternate_shallow_file Add a repository argument to allow callers of set_alternate_shallow_file to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jonathan Nieder	1f93ecd1ab	commit: add repository argument to lookup_commit_graft Add a repository argument to allow callers of lookup_commit_graft to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jonathan Nieder	3f5787f806	commit: add repository argument to register_commit_graft Add a repository argument to allow callers of register_commit_graft to be more specific about which repository to handle. This is a small mechanical change; it doesn't change the implementation to handle repositories other than the_repository yet. As with the previous commits, use a macro to catch callers passing a repository other than the_repository at compile time. Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	cbd53a2193	object-store: move object access functions to object-store.h This should make these functions easier to find and cache.h less overwhelming to read. In particular, this moves: - read_object_file - oid_object_info - write_object_file As a result, most of the codebase needs to #include object-store.h. In this patch the #include is only added to files that would fail to compile otherwise. It would be better to #include wherever identifiers from the header are used. That can happen later when we have better tooling for it. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Martin Ågren	b227586831	lock_file: make function-local locks non-static Placing `struct lock_file`s on the stack used to be a bad idea, because the temp- and lockfile-machinery would keep a pointer into the struct. But after `076aa2cbd` (tempfile: auto-allocate tempfiles on heap, 2017-09-05), we can safely have lockfiles on the stack. (This applies even if a user returns early, leaving a locked lock behind.) These `struct lock_file`s are local to their respective functions and we can drop their staticness. For good measure, I have inspected these sites and come to believe that they always release the lock, with the possible exception of bailing out using `die()` or `exit()` or by returning from a `cmd_foo()`. As pointed out by Jeff King, it would be bad if someone held on to a `struct lock_file *` for some reason. After some grepping, I agree with his findings: no-one appears to be doing that. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	033abf97fc	Replace all die("BUG: ...") calls by BUG() ones In `d8193743e0` (usage.c: add BUG() function, 2017-05-12), a new macro was introduced to use for reporting bugs instead of die(). It was then subsequently used to convert one single caller in `588a538ae5` (setup_git_env: convert die("BUG") to BUG(), 2017-05-12). The cover letter of the patch series containing this patch (cf 20170513032414.mfrwabt4hovujde2@sigill.intra.peff.net) is not terribly clear why only one call site was converted, or what the plan is for other, similar calls to die() to report bugs. Let's just convert all remaining ones in one fell swoop. This trick was performed by this invocation: sed -i 's/die("BUG: /BUG("/g' $(git grep -l 'die("BUG' \*.c) Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Martin Ågren	7199203937	object_array: add and use `object_array_pop()` In a couple of places, we pop objects off an object array `foo` by decreasing `foo.nr`. We access `foo.nr` in many places, but most if not all other times we do so read-only, e.g., as we iterate over the array. But when we change `foo.nr` behind the array's back, it feels a bit nasty and looks like it might leak memory. Leaks happen if the popped element has an allocated `name` or `path`. At the moment, that is not the case. Still, 1) the object array might gain more fields that want to be freed, 2) a code path where we pop might start using names or paths, 3) one of these code paths might be copied to somewhere where we do, and 4) using a dedicated function for popping is conceptually cleaner. Introduce and use `object_array_pop()` instead. Release memory in the new function. Document that popping an object leaves the associated elements in limbo. The converted places were identified by grepping for "\.nr\>" and looking for "--". Make the new function return NULL on an empty array. This is consistent with `pop_commit()` and allows the following: while ((o = object_array_pop(&foo)) != NULL) { // do something } But as noted above, we don't need to go out of our way to avoid reading `foo.nr`. This is probably more readable: while (foo.nr) { ... o = object_array_pop(&foo); // do something } The name of `object_array_pop()` does not quite align with `add_object_array()`. That is unfortunate. On the other hand, it matches `object_array_clear()`. Arguably it's `add_...` that is the odd one out, since it reads like it's used to "add" an "object array". For that reason, side with `object_array_clear()`. Signed-off-by: Martin Ågren <martin.agren@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	06f46f237a	avoid "write_in_full(fd, buf, len) != len" pattern The return value of write_in_full() is either "-1", or the requested number of bytes[1]. If we make a partial write before seeing an error, we still return -1, not a partial value. This goes back to `f6aa66cb95` (write_in_full: really write in full or return error on disk full., 2007-01-11). So checking anything except "was the return value negative" is pointless. And there are a couple of reasons not to do so: 1. It can do a funny signed/unsigned comparison. If your "len" is signed (e.g., a size_t) then the compiler will promote the "-1" to its unsigned variant. This works out for "!= len" (unless you really were trying to write the maximum size_t bytes), but is a bug if you check "< len" (an example of which was fixed recently in config.c). We should avoid promoting the mental model that you need to check the length at all, so that new sites are not tempted to copy us. 2. Checking for a negative value is shorter to type, especially when the length is an expression. 3. Linus says so. In `d34cf19b89` (Clean up write_in_full() users, 2007-01-11), right after the write_in_full() semantics were changed, he wrote: I really wish every "write_in_full()" user would just check against "<0" now, but this fixes the nasty and stupid ones. Appeals to authority aside, this makes it clear that writing it this way does not have an intentional benefit. It's a historical curiosity that we never bothered to clean up (and which was undoubtedly cargo-culted into new sites). So let's convert these obviously-correct cases (this includes write_str_in_full(), which is just a wrapper for write_in_full()). [1] A careful reader may notice there is one way that write_in_full() can return a different value. If we ask write() to write N bytes and get a return value that is _larger_ than N, we could return a larger total. But besides the fact that this would imply a totally broken version of write(), it would already invoke undefined behavior. Our internal remaining counter is an unsigned size_t, which means that subtracting too many byte will wrap it around to a very large number. So we'll instantly begin reading off the end of the buffer, trying to write gigabytes (or petabytes) of data. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	076aa2cbda	tempfile: auto-allocate tempfiles on heap The previous commit taught the tempfile code to give up ownership over tempfiles that have been renamed or deleted. That makes it possible to use a stack variable like this: struct tempfile t; create_tempfile(&t, ...); ... if (!err) rename_tempfile(&t, ...); else delete_tempfile(&t); But doing it this way has a high potential for creating memory errors. The tempfile we pass to create_tempfile() ends up on a global linked list, and it's not safe for it to go out of scope until we've called one of those two deactivation functions. Imagine that we add an early return from the function that forgets to call delete_tempfile(). With a static or heap tempfile variable, the worst case is that the tempfile hangs around until the program exits (and some functions like setup_shallow_temporary rely on this intentionally, creating a tempfile and then leaving it for later cleanup). But with a stack variable as above, this is a serious memory error: the variable goes out of scope and may be filled with garbage by the time the tempfile code looks at it. Let's see if we can make it harder to get this wrong. Since many callers need to allocate arbitrary numbers of tempfiles, we can't rely on static storage as a general solution. So we need to turn to the heap. We could just ask all callers to pass us a heap variable, but that puts the burden on them to call free() at the right time. Instead, let's have the tempfile code handle the heap allocation _and_ the deallocation (when the tempfile is deactivated and removed from the list). This changes the return value of all of the creation functions. For the cleanup functions (delete and rename), we'll add one extra bit of safety: instead of taking a tempfile pointer, we'll take a pointer-to-pointer and set it to NULL after freeing the object. This makes it safe to double-call functions like delete_tempfile(), as the second call treats the NULL input as a noop. Several callsites follow this pattern. The resulting patch does have a fair bit of noise, as each caller needs to be converted to handle: 1. Storing a pointer instead of the struct itself. 2. Passing the pointer instead of taking the struct address. 3. Handling a "struct tempfile " return instead of a file descriptor. We could play games to make this less noisy. For example, by defining the tempfile like this: struct tempfile { struct heap_allocated_part_of_tempfile { int fd; ...etc } actual_data; } Callers would continue to have a "struct tempfile", and it would be "active" only when the inner pointer was non-NULL. But that just makes things more awkward in the long run. There aren't that many callers, so we can simply bite the bullet and adjust all of them. And the compiler makes it easy for us to find them all. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	49bd0fc222	tempfile: do not delete tempfile on failed close When close_tempfile() fails, we delete the tempfile and reset the fields of the tempfile struct. This makes it easier for callers to return without cleaning up, but it also makes this common pattern: if (close_tempfile(tempfile)) return error_errno("error closing %s", tempfile->filename.buf); wrong, because the "filename" field has been reset after the failed close. And it's not easy to fix, as in many cases we don't have another copy of the filename (e.g., if it was created via one of the mks_tempfile functions, and we just have the original template string). Let's drop the feature that a failed close automatically deletes the file. This puts the burden on the caller to do the deletion themselves, but this isn't that big a deal. Callers which do: if (write(...) \|\| close_tempfile(...)) { delete_tempfile(...); return -1; } already had to call delete when the write() failed, and so aren't affected. Likewise, any caller which just calls die() in the error path is OK; we'll delete the tempfile during the atexit handler. Because this patch changes the semantics of close_tempfile() without changing its signature, all callers need to be manually checked and converted to the new scheme. This patch covers all in-tree callers, but there may be others for not-yet-merged topics. To catch these, we rename the function to close_tempfile_gently(), which will attract compile-time attention to new callers. (Technically the original could be considered "gentle" already in that it didn't die() on errors, but this one is even more so). Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	45c6b1ed24	always check return value of close_tempfile If close_tempfile() encounters an error, then it deletes the tempfile and resets the "struct tempfile". But many code paths ignore the return value and continue to use the tempfile. Instead, we should generally treat this the same as a write() error. Note that in the postimage of some of these cases our error message will be bogus after a failed close because we look at tempfile->filename (either directly or via get_tempfile_path). But after the failed close resets the tempfile object, this is guaranteed to be the empty string. That will be addressed in a future patch (because there are many more cases of the same problem than just these instances). Note also in the hunk in gpg-interface.c that it's fine to call delete_tempfile() in the error path, even if close_tempfile() failed and already deleted the file. The tempfile code is smart enough to know the second deletion is a noop. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	c0e963b77c	setup_temporary_shallow: move tempfile struct into function The setup_temporary_shallow() function creates a temporary file, but we never access the tempfile struct outside of the function. This is OK, since it means we'll just clean up the tempfile on exit. But we can simplify the code a bit by moving the global tempfile struct to the only function in which it's used. Note that it must remain "static" due to tempfile.c's requirement that tempfile storage never goes away until program exit. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Jeff King	0899013993	setup_temporary_shallow: avoid using inactive tempfile When there are no shallow entries to write, we skip creating the tempfile entirely and try to return the empty string. But we do so by calling get_tempfile_path() on the inactive tempfile object. This will trigger an assertion that kills the program. The bug was introduced by `6e122b449b` (setup_temporary_shallow(): use tempfile module, 2015-08-10). But nobody seems to have noticed since then because we do not end up calling this function at all when there are no shallow items. In other words, this code path is completely unexercised. Since the tempfile object is a static global, it _is_ possible that we call the function twice, writing out shallow info the first time and then "reusing" our tempfile object the second time. But: 1. It seems unlikely that this was the intent, as hitting this code path would imply somebody clearing the shallow_info list between calls. And if somebody _did_ call the function multiple times without clearing the shallow_info list, we'd hit a different BUG for trying to reuse an already-active tempfile. 2. I verified by code inspection that the function is only called once per program. And also replacing this code with a BUG() and running the test suite demonstrates that it is not triggered there. So we could probably just replace this with an assertion and confirm that it's never called. However, the original intent does seem to be that you _could_ call it when the shallow_info is empty. And that's easy enough to do; since the return value doesn't need to point to a writable buffer, we can just return a string literal. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Stefan Beller	8b65a34c4a	commit: convert lookup_commit_graft to struct object_id With this patch, commit.h doesn't contain the string 'sha1' any more. Signed-off-by: Stefan Beller <sbeller@google.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
René Scharfe	42c78a216e	use DIV_ROUND_UP Convert code that divides and rounds up to use DIV_ROUND_UP to make the intent clearer and reduce the number of magic constants. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
brian m. carlson	bc83266abe	Convert lookup_commit* to struct object_id Convert lookup_commit, lookup_commit_or_die, lookup_commit_reference, and lookup_commit_reference_gently to take struct object_id arguments. Introduce a temporary in parse_object buffer in order to convert this function. This is required since in order to convert parse_object and parse_object_buffer, lookup_commit_reference_gently and lookup_commit_or_die would need to be converted. Not introducing a temporary would therefore require that lookup_commit_or_die take a struct object_id , but lookup_commit would take unsigned char , leaving a confusing and hard-to-use interface. parse_object_buffer will lose this temporary in a later patch. This commit was created with manual changes to commit.c, commit.h, and object.c, plus the following semantic patch: @@ expression E1, E2; @@ - lookup_commit_reference_gently(E1.hash, E2) + lookup_commit_reference_gently(&E1, E2) @@ expression E1, E2; @@ - lookup_commit_reference_gently(E1->hash, E2) + lookup_commit_reference_gently(E1, E2) @@ expression E1; @@ - lookup_commit_reference(E1.hash) + lookup_commit_reference(&E1) @@ expression E1; @@ - lookup_commit_reference(E1->hash) + lookup_commit_reference(E1) @@ expression E1; @@ - lookup_commit(E1.hash) + lookup_commit(&E1) @@ expression E1; @@ - lookup_commit(E1->hash) + lookup_commit(E1) @@ expression E1, E2; @@ - lookup_commit_or_die(E1.hash, E2) + lookup_commit_or_die(&E1, E2) @@ expression E1, E2; @@ - lookup_commit_or_die(E1->hash, E2) + lookup_commit_or_die(E1, E2) Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
brian m. carlson	1e43ed9867	Convert remaining callers of lookup_commit_reference* to object_id There are a small number of remaining callers of lookup_commit_reference and lookup_commit_reference_gently that still need to be converted to struct object_id. Convert these. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
brian m. carlson	e92b848cb6	shallow: convert shallow registration functions to object_id Convert register_shallow and unregister_shallow to take struct object_id. register_shallow is a caller of lookup_commit, which we will convert later. It doesn't make sense for the registration and unregistration functions to have incompatible interfaces, so convert them both. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	7c565a6b2d	shallow: avoid memory leak Reported by Coverity. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
brian m. carlson	910650d2f8	Rename sha1_array to oid_array Since this structure handles an array of object IDs, rename it to struct oid_array. Also rename the accessor functions and the initialization constant. This commit was produced mechanically by providing non-Documentation files to the following Perl one-liners: perl -pi -E 's/struct sha1_array/struct oid_array/g' perl -pi -E 's/\bsha1_array_/oid_array_/g' perl -pi -E 's/SHA1_ARRAY_INIT/OID_ARRAY_INIT/g' Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
brian m. carlson	ee3051bd23	sha1-array: convert internal storage for struct sha1_array to object_id Make the internal storage for struct sha1_array use an array of struct object_id internally. Update the users of this struct which inspect its internals. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	649b0c316a	shallow.c: remove useless code Some context before we talk about the removed code. This paint_down() is part of step 6 of `58babff` (shallow.c: the 8 steps to select new commits for .git/shallow - 2013-12-05). When we fetch from a shallow repository, we need to know if one of the new/updated refs needs new "shallow commits" in .git/shallow (because we don't have enough history of those refs) and which one. The question at step 6 is, what (new) shallow commits are required in other to maintain reachability throughout the repository _without_ cutting our history short? To answer, we mark all commits reachable from existing refs with UNINTERESTING ("rev-list --not --all"), mark shallow commits with BOTTOM, then for each new/updated refs, walk through the commit graph until we either hit UNINTERESTING or BOTTOM, marking the ref on the commit as we walk. After all the walking is done, we check the new shallow commits. If we have not seen any new ref marked on a new shallow commit, we know all new/updated refs are reachable using just our history and .git/shallow. The shallow commit in question is not needed and can be thrown away. So, the code. The loop here (to walk through commits) is basically 1. get one commit from the queue 2. ignore if it's SEEN or UNINTERESTING 3. mark it 4. go through all the parents and.. 5a. mark it if it's never marked before 5b. put it back in the queue What we do in this patch is drop step 5a because it is not necessary. The commit being marked at 5a is put back on the queue, and will be marked at step 3 at the next iteration. The only case it will not be marked is when the commit is already marked UNINTERESTING (5a does not check this), which will be ignored at step 2. But we don't care about refs marking on UNINTERESTING. We care about the marking on _shallow commits_ that are not reachable from our current history (and having UNINTERESTING on it means it's reachable). So it's ok for an UNINTERESTING not to be ref-marked. Reported-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Rasmus Villemoes	1127b3ced5	shallow.c: bit manipulation tweaks First of all, 1 << 31 is technically undefined behaviour, so let's just use an unsigned literal. If i is 'signed int' and gcc doesn't know that i is positive, gcc generates code to compute the C99-mandated values of "i / 32" and "i % 32", which is a lot more complicated than simple a simple shifts/mask. The only caller of paint_down actually passes an "unsigned int" value, but the prototype of paint_down causes (completely well-defined) conversion to signed int, and gcc has no way of knowing that the converted value is non-negative. Just make the id parameter unsigned. In update_refstatus, the change in generated code is much smaller, presumably because gcc is smart enough to see that i starts as 0 and is only incremented, so it is allowed (per the UD of signed overflow) to assume that i is always non-negative. But let's just help less smart compilers generate good code anyway. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Rasmus Villemoes	381aa8e730	shallow.c: avoid theoretical pointer wrap-around The expression info->free+size is technically undefined behaviour in exactly the case we want to test for. Moreover, the compiler is likely to translate the expression to (unsigned long)info->free + size > (unsigned long)info->end where there's at least a theoretical chance that the LHS could wrap around 0, giving a false negative. This might as well be written using pointer subtraction avoiding these issues. Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	f2386c6b77	shallow.c: make paint_alloc slightly more robust paint_alloc() allocates a big block of memory and splits it into smaller, fixed size, chunks of memory whenever it's called. Each chunk contains enough bits to present all "new refs" [1] in a fetch from a shallow repository. We do not check if the new "big block" is smaller than the requested memory chunk though. If it happens, we'll happily pass back a memory region smaller than expected. Which will lead to problems eventually. A normal fetch may add/update a dozen new refs. Let's stay on the "reasonably extreme" side and say we need 16k refs (or bits from paint_alloc's perspective). Each chunk of memory would be 2k, much smaller than the memory pool (512k). So, normally, the under-allocation situation should never happen. A bad guy, however, could make a fetch that adds more than 4m new/updated refs to this code which results in a memory chunk larger than pool size. Check this case and abort. Noticed-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rv@rasmusvillemoes.dk> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> [1] Details are in commit message of `58babff` (shallow.c: the 8 steps to select new commits for .git/shallow - 2013-12-05), step 6. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	6bc3d8c5ec	shallow.c: stop abusing COMMIT_SLAB_SIZE for paint_info's memory pools We need to allocate a "big" block of memory in paint_alloc(). The exact size does not really matter. But the pool size has no relation with commit-slab. Stop using that macro here. Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy	0afd307ab4	shallow.c: rename fields in paint_info to better express their purposes paint_alloc() is basically malloc(), tuned for allocating a fixed number of bits on every call without worrying about freeing any individual allocation since all will be freed at the end. It does it by allocating a big block of memory every time it runs out of "free memory". "slab" is a poor choice of name, at least poorer than "pool". Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago
Lars Schneider	81c634e94f	pkt-line: rename packet_write() to packet_write_fmt() packet_write() should be called packet_write_fmt() because it is a printf-like function that takes a format string as first parameter. packet_write_fmt() should be used for text strings only. Arbitrary binary data should use a new packet_write() function that is introduced in a subsequent patch. Suggested-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago

1 2 3

130 Commits (2f4ba2a867f0390f139b622dbafcab766cb88e80)