kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

3613 Commits

6 Branches

36 Tags

131 MiB

Tree: 2eb063c933

Commit Graph

Author SHA1 Message Date

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Fredrik Kuivinen	fc675b8cd5	git-blame, take 2 Here is an updated version of git-blame. The main changes compared to the first version are: * Use the new revision.h interface to do the revision walking * Do the right thing in a lot of more cases than before. In particular parallel development tracks are hopefully handled sanely. * Lots of clean-up It still won't follow file renames though. There are still some differences in the output between git-blame and git-annotate. For example, in 'Makefile' git-blame assigns lines 354-358 to `455a7f3275` and git-annotate assigns the same lines to `79a9d8ea0d`. I think git-blame is correct in this case. This patterns occur in several other places, git-annotate seems to sometimes assign lines to merge commits when the lines actually changed in some other commit which precedes the merge. [jc: I have conned Ryan into doing test cases, so that it would help development and fixes on both implementations. Let the battle begin! ;-) ] Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago
Fredrik Kuivinen	cbfb73d73f	Add git-blame, a tool for assigning blame. I have also been working on a blame program. The algorithm is pretty much the one described by Junio in his blame.perl. My variant doesn't handle renames, but it shouldn't be too hard to add that. The output is minimal, just the line number followed by the commit SHA1. An interesting observation is that the output from my git-blame and your git-annotate doesn't match on all files in the git repository. One example where several lines differ is read-cache.c. I haven't investigated it further to find out which one is correct. The code should be considered as a work in progress. It certainly has a couple of rough edges. The output looks fairly sane on the few files I have tested it on, but it wouldn't be too surprising if it gets some cases wrong. [jc: adding it to pu for wider comments. I did minimum whitespace fixups but it still needs an indent run and -Wdeclaration-after-statement fixups.] Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	19 years ago

Fredrik Kuivinen

fc675b8cd5

git-blame, take 2

Here is an updated version of git-blame. The main changes compared to
the first version are:

* Use the new revision.h interface to do the revision walking
* Do the right thing in a lot of more cases than before. In particular
  parallel development tracks are hopefully handled sanely.
* Lots of clean-up

It still won't follow file renames though.

There are still some differences in the output between git-blame and
git-annotate. For example, in 'Makefile' git-blame assigns lines
354-358 to 455a7f3275 and git-annotate
assigns the same lines to 79a9d8ea0d.

I think git-blame is correct in this case. This patterns occur in
several other places, git-annotate seems to sometimes assign lines to
merge commits when the lines actually changed in some other commit
which precedes the merge.

[jc: I have conned Ryan into doing test cases, so that it would
help development and fixes on both implementations.  Let the
battle begin! ;-) ]

Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

19 years ago

Fredrik Kuivinen

cbfb73d73f

Add git-blame, a tool for assigning blame.

I have also been working on a blame program. The algorithm is pretty
much the one described by Junio in his blame.perl. My variant doesn't
handle renames, but it shouldn't be too hard to add that. The output
is minimal, just the line number followed by the commit SHA1.

An interesting observation is that the output from my git-blame and
your git-annotate doesn't match on all files in the git
repository. One example where several lines differ is read-cache.c. I
haven't investigated it further to find out which one is correct.

The code should be considered as a work in progress. It certainly has
a couple of rough edges. The output looks fairly sane on the few files
I have tested it on, but it wouldn't be too surprising if it gets some
cases wrong.

[jc: adding it to pu for wider comments. I did minimum
whitespace fixups but it still needs an indent run and
-Wdeclaration-after-statement fixups.]

Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>

19 years ago

3 Commits (2eb063c9331d73548e0fe68802e73ccd68a41046)