When recording a merge that conflicted and ends up in no changes after
manual resolution, commit callchain looked like this:
cmd_commit() ->
prepare_log_message() ->
run_status() ->
wt_status_print()
This invocation of run_status() is asked to find out if there is a
committable change, but it unconditionally gave instructions such as
"use git-add" at the same time. When in merge, we do allow an empty
change to be recorded, so after showing this message the code still went
ahead and made a commit.
This introduces "nowarn" parameter to run_status() to avoid these
useless messages. If we are not allowed to create an empty commit, we
already call run_status() again in the original codepath, and the
message will be shown from that call anyway.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The output of git-status was recently changed to output relative
paths. Setting this variable to false restores the old behavior for
any old-timers that prefer it.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Now that we are correctly removing leading prefixes from files in git
status, there is a degenerate case: the directory matching the prefix.
Because we show only the directory name for a directory that contains
only untracked files, it gets collapsed to an empty string.
Example:
$ git init
$ mkdir subdir
$ touch subdir/file
$ git status
...
# Untracked files:
# (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
#
# subdir/
So far, so good.
$ cd subdir
$ git status
....
# Untracked files:
# (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed)
#
#
Oops, that's a bit confusing.
This patch prints './' to show that there is some output.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This adds an option to help scripts find out color settings from
the configuration file.
git config --get-colorbool color.diff
inspects color.diff variable, and exits with status 0 (i.e. success) if
color is to be used. It exits with status 1 otherwise.
If a script wants "true"/"false" answer to the standard output of the
command, it can pass an additional boolean parameter to its command
line, telling if its standard output is a terminal, like this:
git config --get-colorbool color.diff true
When called like this, the command outputs "true" to its standard output
if color is to be used (i.e. "color.diff" says "always", "auto", or
"true"), and "false" otherwise.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The code tries to collapse identical leading components
between the prefix and the path. So if we're in "dir1", the
path "dir1/file" should become just "file". However, we were
ending up with "../dir1/file". The included test expected
the wrong output.
The "len" parameter to quote_path can be negative to mean
"this is a NUL terminated string". Simply count it so that
the loop can rely on it being the length of the path.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
run_diff_index() and the entire diff machinery is hard coded to output
to stdout, so just redirect that and restore it when done.
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To show the relative paths, the function formerly called quote_crlf()
(now called quote_path()) takes the prefix as an additional argument.
While at it, the static buffers were replaced by strbufs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are inconsistencies in the way commands currently handle
the core.excludesfile configuration variable. The problem is
the variable is too new to be noticed by anything other than
git-add and git-status.
* git-ls-files does not notice any of the "ignore" files by
default, as it predates the standardized set of ignore files.
The calling scripts established the convention to use
.git/info/exclude, .gitignore, and later core.excludesfile.
* git-add and git-status know about it because they call
add_excludes_from_file() directly with their own notion of
which standard set of ignore files to use. This is just a
stupid duplication of code that need to be updated every time
the definition of the standard set of ignore files is
changed.
* git-read-tree takes --exclude-per-directory=<gitignore>,
not because the flexibility was needed. Again, this was
because the option predates the standardization of the ignore
files.
* git-merge-recursive uses hardcoded per-directory .gitignore
and nothing else. git-clean (scripted version) does not
honor core.* because its call to underlying ls-files does not
know about it. git-clean in C (parked in 'pu') doesn't either.
We probably could change git-ls-files to use the standard set
when no excludes are specified on the command line and ignore
processing was asked, or something like that, but that will be a
change in semantics and might break people's scripts in a subtle
way. I am somewhat reluctant to make such a change.
On the other hand, I think it makes perfect sense to fix
git-read-tree, git-merge-recursive and git-clean to follow the
same rule as other commands. I do not think of a valid use case
to give an exclude-per-directory that is nonstandard to
read-tree command, outside a "negative" test in the t1004 test
script.
This patch is the first step to untangle this mess.
The next step would be to teach read-tree, merge-recursive and
clean (in C) to use setup_standard_excludes().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There are inconsistencies in the way commands currently handle
the core.excludesfile configuration variable. The problem is
the variable is too new to be noticed by anything other than
git-add and git-status.
* git-ls-files does not notice any of the "ignore" files by
default, as it predates the standardized set of ignore files.
The calling scripts established the convention to use
.git/info/exclude, .gitignore, and later core.excludesfile.
* git-add and git-status know about it because they call
add_excludes_from_file() directly with their own notion of
which standard set of ignore files to use. This is just a
stupid duplication of code that need to be updated every time
the definition of the standard set of ignore files is
changed.
* git-read-tree takes --exclude-per-directory=<gitignore>,
not because the flexibility was needed. Again, this was
because the option predates the standardization of the ignore
files.
* git-merge-recursive uses hardcoded per-directory .gitignore
and nothing else. git-clean (scripted version) does not
honor core.* because its call to underlying ls-files does not
know about it. git-clean in C (parked in 'pu') doesn't either.
We probably could change git-ls-files to use the standard set
when no excludes are specified on the command line and ignore
processing was asked, or something like that, but that will be a
change in semantics and might break people's scripts in a subtle
way. I am somewhat reluctant to make such a change.
On the other hand, I think it makes perfect sense to fix
git-read-tree, git-merge-recursive and git-clean to follow the
same rule as other commands. I do not think of a valid use case
to give an exclude-per-directory that is nonstandard to
read-tree command, outside a "negative" test in the t1004 test
script.
This patch is the first step to untangle this mess.
The next step would be to teach read-tree, merge-recursive and
clean (in C) to use setup_standard_excludes().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We still default to get_index_file(), but this can be overridden
by setting wt_status.index_file after calling wt_status_prepare().
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Still defaults to stdout, but you can now override wt_status.fp after
calling wt_status_prepare().
Signed-off-by: Kristian Høgsberg <krh@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This adds more proper rename detection limits. Instead of just checking
the limit against the number of potential rename destinations, we verify
that the rename matrix (which is what really matters) doesn't grow
ridiculously large, and we also make sure that we don't overflow when
doing the matrix size calculation.
This also changes the default limits from unlimited, to a rename matrix
that is limited to 100 entries on a side. You can raise it with the config
entry, or by using the "-l<n>" command line flag, but at least the default
is now a sane number that avoids spending lots of time (and memory) in
situations that likely don't merit it.
The choice of default value is of course very debatable. Limiting the
rename matrix to a 100x100 size will mean that even if you have just one
obvious rename, but you also create (or delete) 10,000 files, the rename
matrix will be so big that we disable the heuristics. Sounds reasonable to
me, but let's see if people hit this (and, perhaps more importantly,
actually *care*) in real life.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
git-add reads this variable, and honours the contents of that file if that
exists. Match this behaviour in git-status, too.
Noticed by Evan Carroll on IRC.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The way things are set up, you can now pass a "pathspec" to the
"read_directory()" function. If you pass NULL, it acts exactly
like it used to do (read everything). If you pass a non-NULL
pointer, it will simplify it into a "these are the prefixes
without any special characters", and stop any readdir() early if
the path in question doesn't match any of the prefixes.
NOTE! This does *not* obviate the need for the caller to do the *exact*
pathspec match later. It's a first-level filter on "read_directory()", but
it does not do the full pathspec thing. Maybe it should. But in the
meantime, builtin-add.c really does need to do first
read_directory(dir, .., pathspec);
if (pathspec)
prune_directory(dir, pathspec, baselen);
ie the "prune_directory()" part will do the *exact* pathspec pruning,
while the "read_directory()" will use the pathspec just to do some quick
high-level pruning of the directories it will recurse into.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There were instances of strncmp() that were formatted improperly
(e.g. whitespace around parameter before closing parenthesis)
that caused the earlier mechanical conversion step to miss
them. This step cleans them up.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This mechanically converts strncmp() to use prefixcmp(), but only when
the parameters match specific patterns, so that they can be verified
easily. Leftover from this will be fixed in a separate step, including
idiotic conversions like
if (!strncmp("foo", arg, 3))
=>
if (!(-prefixcmp(arg, "foo")))
This was done by using this script in px.perl
#!/usr/bin/perl -i.bak -p
if (/strncmp\(([^,]+), "([^\\"]*)", (\d+)\)/ && (length($2) == $3)) {
s|strncmp\(([^,]+), "([^\\"]*)", (\d+)\)|prefixcmp($1, "$2")|;
}
if (/strncmp\("([^\\"]*)", ([^,]+), (\d+)\)/ && (length($1) == $3)) {
s|strncmp\("([^\\"]*)", ([^,]+), (\d+)\)|(-prefixcmp($2, "$1"))|;
}
and running:
$ git grep -l strncmp -- '*.c' | xargs perl px.perl
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Suggesting the use of [-a|-i|-o] with git-commit is unnecessarily
complex and confusing. In this context -o is totally useless and -i
requires extra arguments which are not mentioned. The only sensible
hint (besides reading the man page but let's not go there) is
"commit -a".
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If you do:
$ /bin/rm foo
$ git status
we used to say "git add ... to add content to commit". But
suggsting "git add" to record the deletion of a file is simply
insane.
So this rewords various things:
- The section header is the old "Changed but not updated",
instead of "Changed but not added";
- Suggestion is "git add ... to update what will be committed",
instead of "... to add content to commit";
- If there are removed paths, the above suggestion becomes "git
add/rm ... to update what will be committed";
- For untracked files, the suggestion is "git add ... to
include in what will be committed".
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Since 98bf8a47c2 status would claim that
git-commit could be useful even if there are no changes except untracked files.
Since wt-status is already computing all the information needed go the whole
way and actually track the (non-)emptiness of all three sections separately,
unify the code, and provide useful messages for each individual case.
Thanks to Junio and Michael Loeffler for suggestions.
Signed-off-by: Jürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>
Since git-reset has learned restoring the absence of paths git-rm --cached is
no longer necessary. Therefore remove it from the cached content header hint.
Also remove the unfortunate wording 'Cached' from the header itself.
Signed-off-by: Jürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This tries to be more to the point while also including a pointer on how to
unstage changes from the index.
Since this header is printed in two different code paths and the name of the
reference commit is needed for the unstage part, provide a new printing
function.
Signed-off-by: Jürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
We check the existence of the parent commit to determine whether the status is
requested for an initial commit. Since the parent commit depends on the
presence of the --amend switch do initial commit detection after command line
arguments have been handled.
Signed-off-by: Jürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Previously git-status in a clean working directory would advice the user to use
git add. This isn't very helpful when there is nothing to add in the working
directory, therefore note a clean working directory while displaying the other
sections and print the appropriate message for each case.
Signed-off-by: Jürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This uses the actual (simplified) synopsis line from the git-add man page and
advertises its incremental nature.
Signed-off-by: Jürgen Rühle <j-r@online.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is a mechanical clean-up of the way *.c files include
system header files.
(1) sources under compat/, platform sha-1 implementations, and
xdelta code are exempt from the following rules;
(2) the first #include must be "git-compat-util.h" or one of
our own header file that includes it first (e.g. config.h,
builtin.h, pkt-line.h);
(3) system headers that are included in "git-compat-util.h"
need not be included in individual C source files.
(4) "git-compat-util.h" does not have to include subsystem
specific header files (e.g. expat.h).
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If the current branch was "master" then git-status wouldn't say
# On branch XXXX
In its output. This patch makes it so that this message is always
output; regardless of branch name.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Now that 'git add' is considered a first-class UI for 'update-index'
and that the 'git add' documentation states "Even modified files
must be added to the set of changes about to be committed" we should
make the output of 'git status' align with that documentation and
common usage.
So now we see a status output such as:
# Added but not yet committed:
# (will commit)
#
# new file: x
#
# Changed but not added:
# (use "git add file1 file2" to include for commit)
#
# modified: x
#
# Untracked files:
# (use "git add" on files to include for commit)
#
# y
which just reads better in the context of using 'git add' to
manipulate a commit (and not a checkin, whatever the heck that is).
We also now support 'color.status.added' as an alias for the existing
'color.status.updated', as this alias more closely aligns with the
current output and documentation.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
If a user modifies files and runs 'git commit' (without the very
useful -a option) and they have not yet updated the index they
are probably coming from another SCM-like tool which would perform
the same as 'git commit -a' in this case. Showing the user their
current status and a final line of "nothing to commit" is not very
reassuring, as the user might believe that Git did not recognize
their files were modified.
Instead we can suggest as part of the 'nothing to commit' message
that the user invoke 'git add' to add files to their next commit.
Suggested by Andy Parkins' Git 'niggles' list
(<200612132237.10051.andyparkins@gmail.com>).
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
While adding colour to the branch command it was pointed out that a
config option like "branch.color" conflicts with the pre-existing
"branch.something" namespace used for specifying default merge urls and
branches. The suggested solution was to flip the order of the
components to "color.branch", which I did for colourising branch.
This patch does the same thing for
- git-log (color.diff)
- git-status (color.status)
- git-diff (color.diff)
- pager (color.pager)
I haven't removed the old config options; but they should probably be
deprecated and eventually removed to prevent future namespace
collisions. I've done this deprecation by changing the documentation
for the config file to match the new names; and adding the "color.XXX"
options to contrib/completion/git-completion.bash.
Unfortunately git-svn reads "diff.color" and "pager.color"; which I
don't like to change unilaterally.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This brings the power of the index up front using a proper mental model
without talking about the index at all. See for example how all the
technical discussion has been evacuated from the git-add man page.
Any content to be committed must be added together. Whether that
content comes from new files or modified files doesn't matter. You
just need to "add" it, either with git-add, or by providing
git-commit with -a (for already known files only of course).
No need for a separate command to distinguish new vs modified files
please. That would only screw the mental model everybody should have
when using GIT.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@cam.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Otherwise, commit log template would get the remainder of the
filename start on a new line unquoted and the log gets messed
up.
I initially considered using the full quote_c_style(), but the
output from the command is primarily for human consumption so
chose to leave other control characters and bytes with high-bits
unmolested.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
In wt-status.c there is a test which does nothing.
This patch removes it.
Signed-off-by: Tero Roponen <teanropo@jyu.fi>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The wt_status_print_updated() and wt_status_print_untracked() routines
call setup_revisions() with 'HEAD' being the reference to the tip of the
current branch. However, setup_revisions() gets confused if the branch
also contains a file named 'HEAD' resulting in a fatal error.
Instead, don't pass an argv to setup_revisions() at all; simply give it no
arguments, and make 'HEAD' the default revision.
Bug noticed by Rocco Rutte <pdmef@gmx.net>.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When all the filenames line up it's much easier to copy and paste them
somewhere else, or to remove the "modified:", "copied:", etc prefix.
Signed-off-by: Andy Parkins <andyparkins@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds a "int *flag" parameter to resolve_ref() and makes
for_each_ref() family to call callback function with an extra
"int flag" parameter. They are used to give two bits of
information (REF_ISSYMREF and REF_ISPACKED) about the ref.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This was accidentally introduced during the fixes to avoid putting newlines
inside of colorized output.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Actually, teach runstatus what to do if it is not passed; it should not list
the contents of completely untracked directories, but only the name of that
directory (plus a trailing '/').
[jc: with comments by Jeff King to match hide-empty-directories
behaviour of the original.]
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This creates a new git-runstatus which should do roughly the same thing
as the run_status function from git-commit.sh. Except for color support,
the main focus has been to keep the output identical, so that it can be
verified as correct and then used as a C platform for other improvements to
the status printing code.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Junio C Hamano