Most usage strings, such as for command xxx, start with "git-xxx".
This updates the rebels to conform to the general pattern.
(The git wrapper is an exception to this, of course ...)
Signed-off-by: Ramsay Allan Jones <ramsay@ramsay1.demon.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Any git command that expects to work in a subdirectory of a project, and
that reads the git config files (which is just about all of them) needs to
make sure that it does the "setup_git_directory()" call before it tries to
read the config file.
This means, among other things, that we need to move the call out of
"init_revisions()", and into the caller.
This does the mostly trivial conversion to do that.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This doesn't make the code uglier or harder to read, yet it makes the
code more portable. This also simplifies checking for other potential
incompatibilities. "gcc -std=c89 -pedantic" can flag many incompatible
constructs as warnings, but C99 comments will cause it to emit an error.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The only visible change is that git-blame doesn't understand
"--compability" anymore, but it does accept "--compatibility" instead,
which is already documented.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
ANSI C99 requires void-pointers when using the `%p' format. This patch adds the
neccessary cast in `blame.c'.
Signed-off-by: Florian Forster <octo@verplant.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Every single user actually wanted this only for commit objects, and we
have no reason to waste space on it for other object types. So just move
the structure member from the low-level "struct object" into the "struct
commit".
This leaves the commit object the same size, and removes one unnecessary
pointer from all other object allocations.
This shrinks memory usage (still at a fairly hefty half-gig, admittedly)
of "git-rev-list --all --objects" on the mozilla repo by another 5% in my
tests.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
fix the usage string and clean up the docs while we are at it
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is preparatory work for further cleanups, where we try to make
tree_entry look more like the more efficient tree-walk descriptor.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is preparatory work for further cleanups, where we try to make
tree_entry look more like the more efficient tree-walk descriptor.
Instead of having a union of pointers to blob/tree/objects, this just
makes "struct tree_entry" have the raw SHA1, and makes all the users use
that instead (often that implies adding a "lookup_tree(..)" on the sha1,
but sometimes the user just wanted the SHA1 in the first place, and it
just avoids an unnecessary indirection).
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes git-blame useable again, it has been totally broken for
some time on larger repositories.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes things that include revision.h build again.
Blame is also built, but I am not sure how well it works (or how
well it worked to begin with) -- it was relying on tree-diff to
be using whatever pathspec was used the last time, which smells
a bit suspicious.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Recent revision.c updates completely broken the assignment of
blames by not rewriting commit->parents field unless explicitly
asked to by the caller. The caller needs to set revs.parents.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This removes the last use of external diff from core git suite.
Also addresses the use of index() -- elsewhere we tend to use
strchr().
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This replaces occurences of "blob", "commit", "tag", and "tree",
where they're really used as type specifiers, which we already
have defined global constants for.
Signed-off-by: Peter Eriksen <s022018@student.dtu.dk>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes sure that many commands that take refs on the command
line to honor core.warnambiguousrefs configuration. Earlier,
the commands affected by this patch did not read the
configuration file.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Using "size_t" values for printf field width/precision upsets gcc, it
wants to see an "int".
Signed-off-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Before this patch git-blame <directory> gave non-sensible output. (It
assigned blame to some random file in <directory>) Abort with an error
message instead.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
As pointed out by Junio, it may be dangerous to cut off people's names
after 15 bytes. If the name is encoded in an encoding which uses more
than one byte per code point we may end up with outputting garbage.
Instead of trying to do something smart, just output the entire name.
We don't gain much screen space by chopping it off anyway.
Furthermore, only output the file name if we actually found any
renames.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The commit 604c86d15b changed the
original "diff -u0" to "diff -u -U 0" for portability.
A big mistake without proper testing.
The form "diff -u -U 0" shows the default 3-line contexts,
because -u and -U 0 contradicts with each other; "diff -U 0" (or
its longhand "diff --unified=0") is what we meant.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Earlier they showed gmtime and timezone, which was inconsistent
with the way our commits and tags are pretty-printed.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The default output mode is slightly different from git-annotate's.
However, git-annotate's output mode can be obtained by using the
'-c' flag.
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Mark Wooding noticed there was a type mismatch warning in git.c; this
patch does things slightly differently (mostly tightening const) and
was what I was holding onto, waiting for the setup-revisions change
to be merged into the master branch.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Here is an updated version of git-blame. The main changes compared to
the first version are:
* Use the new revision.h interface to do the revision walking
* Do the right thing in a lot of more cases than before. In particular
parallel development tracks are hopefully handled sanely.
* Lots of clean-up
It still won't follow file renames though.
There are still some differences in the output between git-blame and
git-annotate. For example, in 'Makefile' git-blame assigns lines
354-358 to 455a7f3275 and git-annotate
assigns the same lines to 79a9d8ea0d.
I think git-blame is correct in this case. This patterns occur in
several other places, git-annotate seems to sometimes assign lines to
merge commits when the lines actually changed in some other commit
which precedes the merge.
[jc: I have conned Ryan into doing test cases, so that it would
help development and fixes on both implementations. Let the
battle begin! ;-) ]
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I have also been working on a blame program. The algorithm is pretty
much the one described by Junio in his blame.perl. My variant doesn't
handle renames, but it shouldn't be too hard to add that. The output
is minimal, just the line number followed by the commit SHA1.
An interesting observation is that the output from my git-blame and
your git-annotate doesn't match on all files in the git
repository. One example where several lines differ is read-cache.c. I
haven't investigated it further to find out which one is correct.
The code should be considered as a work in progress. It certainly has
a couple of rough edges. The output looks fairly sane on the few files
I have tested it on, but it wouldn't be too surprising if it gets some
cases wrong.
[jc: adding it to pu for wider comments. I did minimum
whitespace fixups but it still needs an indent run and
-Wdeclaration-after-statement fixups.]
Signed-off-by: Fredrik Kuivinen <freku045@student.liu.se>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Ramsay Allan Jones