This patch allows the testsuite to run properly when the full path to
the git sources contains spaces or other symbols that need to be quoted.
Signed-off-by: Pavel Roskin <proski@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Pavel Roskin wondered what the SHA1 output at the beginning of
git-diff-tree was about. The only consumer of that information
so far is this git-patch-id command, which was inadequately
documented.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-name-rev, git-mv and git-shell are recent additions to git.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
According to my checks, these were the only commands not yet linked.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This removes the unoptimization. The previous round does not mind
missing fan-out directories, but still makes sure they exist, lest
older versions choke on a repository created/packed by it.
This round does not play that nicely anymore -- empty fan-out
directories are not created by init-db, and will stay removed by
prune-packed. The prune command also removes empty fan-out directories.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To generate the diff for a commit, gitk used to do
git-diff-tree -p -C $p $id
(and same thing to generate filenames, except using just "-r" there) which
does actually generate the diff from the parent to the $id, exactly like
it meant to do.
However, that really sucks with --dense, where the "parent" information
has all been rewritten to point to the previous commit. The diff actually
works exactly right, but now it's the diff of the _whole_ sequence of
commits all the way to the previous commit that last changed the file(s)
that we are looking at.
And that's really not what we want 99.9% of the time, even if it may be
perfectly sensible. Not only will the diff not actually match the commit
message, but it will usually be _huge_, and all of it will be totally
uninteresting to us, since we were only interested in a particular set of
files.
It also doesn't match what we do when we write the patch to a file.
So this makes gitk just show the diff of _that_ commit.
We might even want to have some way to limit the diff to only the
filenames we're interested in, but it's often nice to see what else
changed at the same time, so that's secondary.
The merge diff handling is left alone, although I think that should also
be changed to only look at what that _particular_ merge did, not what it
did when compared to the faked-out parents.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
What happens is that the new logic decides that if it can't look up a
commit reference (ie "get_commit_reference()" returns NULL), the thing
must be a pathname.
Fair enough.
But wrong.
The thing is, it may be a perfectly fine ref that _isn't_ a commit. In
git, you have a tag that points to your PGP key, and in the kernel, I have
a tag that points to a tree (and a direct ref that points to that tree
too, for that matter).
So the rule is (as for all the other programs that mix revs and pathnames)
not that we only accept commit references, but _any_ valid object ref.
If the object then isn't a commit ref, git-rev-list will either ignore it,
or add it to the list of non-commit objects (if using "--objects").
The solution is to move the "get_sha1()" out of get_commit_reference(),
and into the callers. In fact, we already _have_ the SHA1 in the case of
the handle_all() loop, since for_each_ref() will have done it for us, so
this is the correct thing to do anyway.
This patch (on top of the original one) does exactly that.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This actually does three things:
- make "--dense" the default for git-rev-list. Since dense is a no-op if
no filenames are given, this doesn't actually change any historical
behaviour, but it's logically the right default (if we want to prune on
filenames, do it fully. The sparse "merge-only" thing may be useful,
but it's not what you'd normally expect)
- make "git-rev-parse" show the default revision control before it shows
any pathnames.
This was a real bug, but nobody would ever have noticed, because
the default thing tends to only make sense for git-rev-list, and
git-rev-list didn't use to take pathnames.
- it changes "git-rev-list" to match the other commands that take a mix
of revisions and filenames - it no longer requires the "--" before
filenames (although you still need to do it if a filename could be
confused with a revision name, eg "gitk" in the git archive)
This all just makes for much more pleasant and obvous usage. Just doing a
gitk t/
does the obvious thing: it will show the history as it concerns the "t/"
subdirectory.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
... and if not, write an appropriate .git/config. Of course, that happens
only if no config file was yet created (by a template or a hook).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-name-rev tries to find nice symbolic names for commits. It does so by
walking the commits from the refs. When the symbolic name is ambiguous, the
following heuristic is applied: Try to avoid too many ~'s, and if two ambiguous
names have the same count of ~'s, take the one whose last number is smaller.
With "--tags", the names are derived only from tags.
With "--stdin", the stdin is parsed, and after every sha1 for which a name
could be found, the name is appended. (Try "git log | git name-rev --stdin".)
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-pack-objects can reuse pack files stored in $GIT_DIR/pack-cache
directory, when a necessary pack is found. This is hopefully useful
when upload-pack (called from git-daemon) is expected to receive
requests for the same set of objects many times (e.g full cloning
request of any project, or updates from the set of heads previous day
to the latest for a slow moving project).
Currently git-pack-objects does *not* keep pack files it creates for
reusing. It might be useful to add --update-cache option to it,
which would allow it store pack files it created in the pack-cache
directory, and prune rarely used ones from it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Recent FAT workaround caused compilation trouble on OpenBSD;
different platforms use different error codes when we try to
hardlink the temporary file to its final location. Existing
Coda hack also checks its own error code, but the thing is,
the case we care about is if link failed for a reason other
than that the final file has already existed (which would be
normal, or it could mean collision). So just check the error
code against EEXIST.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
upload-pack would set create_full_pack=1 if nr_has==0, but would ask later
if nr_needs<MAX_NEEDS. If that proves true, it would ignore create_full_pack,
and arguments would be written into unreserved memory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes sure what the other end asks for are among what we
offered to give them. Otherwise we would end up running
git-rev-list with 20-byte nonsense, only to find it either die
(because the object was not found) or waste time (because we
ended up serving that phony 'client').
Also avoid wasting needs_sha1 pool to record duplicates, and
detect cloning requests better.
[this used to be on top of Johannes fetch-pack enhancements,
which we are rewinding it for further testing for now, so
the commit is rebased.]
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
FAT -- like Coda -- does not like cross-directory hard links. To be
precise, FAT does not like links at all. But links are not needed either.
So get rid of them.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
There are filesystems out there which do not understand symlinks, even if
the OS is perfectly capable of writing them. So, do not fail right away,
but try to write a symbolic ref first. If that fails, you can die().
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Instead of having the user to edit the mail message, let the hand merge
result stored in .dotest/patch and continue, which is easier to manage.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Right now --dense will _always_ show the root commit. I didn't do the
logic that does the diff against an empty tree. I was lazy.
This patch does that. The first round was incorrect but
this patch is even slightly tested, and might do a better job.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch adds usage string to git-update-index, can be printed by the -h
or --help parameter.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
When moving multiple files at once, it can happen that
files get the same target name, like in
git-mv a/foo b/foo destdir
Both a/foo and b/foo target destdir/foo.
Signed-off-by: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
I can confirm that the following patch lets the current origin
compile on OpenBSD. If you could apply this until you sort out the
rest of the namespace issue, I would be happy. Thanks.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch concludes the series, which makes
git-fetch-pack/git-upload-pack negotiate a potentially better set of
common revs. It should make a difference when fetching from a repository
with a few branches.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The code used to call git-rev-list to enumerate the local revisions. A
disadvantage of that method was that git-rev-list, lacking a control apart
from the command line, would happily enumerate ancestors of acknowledged
common commits, which was just taking unnecessary bandwidth.
Therefore, do not use git-rev-list on the fetching side, but rather
construct the list on the go. Send the revisions starting from the local
heads, ignoring the revisions known to be common.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
The current fetch/upload protocol works like this:
- client sends revs it wants to have via "want" messages
- client sends a flush message (message with len 0)
- client sends revs it has via "have" messages
- after one window (32 revs), a flush is sent
- after each subsequent window, a flush is sent, and an ACK/NAK is received.
(NAK means that server does not have any of the transmitted revs;
ACK sends also the sha1 of the rev server has)
- when the first ACK is received, client sends "done", and does not expect
any further messages
One special case, though:
- if no ACK is received (only NAK's), and client runs out of revs to send,
"done" is sent, and server sends just one more "NAK"
A smarter scheme, which actually has a chance to detect more than one
common rev, would be to send more than just one ACK. This patch implements
the server side of the following extension to the protocol:
- client sends at least one "want" message with "multi_ack" appended, like
"want 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 multi_ack"
- if the server understands that extension, it will send ACK messages for all
revs it has, not just the first one
- server appends "continue" to the ACK messages like
"ACK 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890 continue"
until it has MAX_HAS-1 revs. In this manner, client knows when to
stop sending revs by checking for the substring "continue" (and
further knows that server understands multi_ack)
In this manner, the protocol stays backwards compatible, since both client
must send "want ... multi_ack" and server must answer with "ACK ...
continue" to enable the extension.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This patch is based on Junio's proposal. It marks parents of common revs
so that they do not clutter up the has_sha1 array.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This adds a very git specific restricted shell, that can be
added to /etc/shells and set to the pw_shell in the /etc/passwd
file, to give users ability to push into repositories over ssh
without giving them full interactive shell acount.
[jc: I updated Linus' patch to match what the current sq_quote()
does.]
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
What we list as "Ignored files" are not "ignored". Rather, it
is the list of "not listed in the to-be-ignored files, but
exists -- you may be forgetting to add them".
Pointed out by Daniel.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
It supersedes git-rename by adding functionality to move multiple
files, directories or symlinks into another directory. It also
provides according documentation.
The implementation renames multiple files, using the arguments from
the command line to produce an array of sources and destinations. In
a first pass, all requested renames are checked for errors, and
overwriting of existing files is only allowed with '-f'. The actual
renaming is done in a second pass. This ensures that any error
condition is checked before anything is changed.
Signed-off-by: Josef Weidendorfer <Josef.Weidendorfer@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
git-http-fetch spits out curl 404 error message when unable to fetch an object,
but that's confusing since no error really happened and the object is usually
found in a pack it tries right after that. And if the object still cannot be
retrieved, it will say another error message anyway. OTOH other HTTP errors
(403 etc) are likely fatal and the user should be still informed about them.
Signed-off-by: Petr Baudis <pasky@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is what the recent git-rev-list changes have all been gearing up for.
When we use a path filter to git-rev-list, the new "--dense" flag asks
git-rev-list to compress the history so that it _only_ contains commits
that change files in the path filter. It also rewrites the parent
information so that tools like "gitk" will see the result as a dense
history tree.
For example, on the current kernel archive:
[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD | wc -l
9904
[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD -- kernel | wc -l
5442
[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list --dense HEAD -- kernel | wc -l
356
which shows that while we have almost ten thousand commits, we can prune
down the work to slightly more than half by only following the merges
that are interesting. But further, we can then compress the history to
just 356 entries that actually make changes to the kernel subdirectory.
To see this in action, try something like
gitk --dense -- gitk
to see just the history that affects gitk. Or, to show that true
parallel development still remains parallel, do
gitk --dense -- daemon.c
which shows some parallel commits in the current git tree.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This is the first cut at a git-rev-list that knows to ignore commits that
don't change a certain file (or set of files).
NOTE! For now it only prunes _merge_ commits, and follows the parent where
there are no differences in the set of files specified. In the long run,
I'd like to make it re-write the straight-line history too, but for now
the merge simplification is much more fundamentally important (the
rewriting of straight-line history is largely a separate simplification
phase, but the merge simplification needs to happen early if we want to
optimize away unnecessary commit parsing).
If all parents of a merge change some of the files, the merge is left as
is, so the end result is in no way guaranteed to be a linear history, but
it will often be a lot /more/ linear than the full tree, since it prunes
out parents that didn't matter for that set of files.
As an example from the current kernel:
[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD | wc -l
9885
[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD -- Makefile | wc -l
4084
[torvalds@g5 linux]$ git-rev-list HEAD -- drivers/usb | wc -l
5206
and you can also use 'gitk' to more visually see the pruning of the
history tree, with something like
gitk -- drivers/usb
showing a simplified history that tries to follow the first parent in a
merge that is the parent that fully defines drivers/usb/.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
This makes the tree diff functionality independent of the "git-diff-tree"
program, by splitting the core functionality up into a library file.
This will be needed for when we teach git-rev-list to only follow a
specified set of pathnames, rather than the global revision history.
Most of it is a fairly straightforward code move, but it also involves
some calling convention cleanup, and moving some of the static variables
from diff-tree.c into the options structure.
The actual tree change callback routines also become paramterized by the
diff_options structure, allowing the library functionality to do something
else than just show the diff on stdout.
Right now the only user of this functionality remains git-diff-tree
itself.
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Martin Langhoff wants to use git-merge from outside git-pull and wants
to do further processing; for this, he wants git-merge no to commit
even when it cleanly merges. I think other script writers would want
something like that as well, so here it is.
Instead of the "merge commit message" parameter (which usually is made
for you by "git-pull" which calls this command), you pass an empty
string to it. Then it will not update your HEAD -- you can do whatever
you want with the resulting index file, which contains the merge results.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Later round would further improve fetch-pack not to send useless "have",
but in the meantime, increase it to help upload-pack to find more common
commits, as discussed on the list.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
Pavel Roskin