kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Johannes Schindelin	411e4f4735	ci: run `hdr-check` as part of the `Static Analysis` job Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	eaa62291ff	ci: inherit --jobs via MAKEFLAGS in run-build-and-tests Let's not decide in the generic ci/ part how many jobs to run in parallel; different CI configurations would favor a different number of parallel jobs, and it is easy enough to hand that information down via the `MAKEFLAGS` variable. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	c2160f2d19	ci: rename the library of common functions The name is hard-coded to reflect that we use Travis CI for continuous testing. In the next commits, we will extend this to be able use Azure DevOps, too. So let's adjust the name to make it more generic. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	0860a7641b	travis-ci: fail if Coccinelle static analysis found something to transform Coccinelle's and in turn 'make coccicheck's exit code only indicates that Coccinelle managed to finish its analysis without any errors (e.g. no unknown --options, no missing files, no syntax errors in the semantic patches, etc.), but it doesn't indicate whether it found any undesired code patterns to transform or not. To find out the latter, one has to look closer at 'make coccicheck's standard output and look for lines like: SPATCH result: contrib/coccinelle/<something>.cocci.patch And this only indicates that there is something to transform, but to see what the suggested transformations are one has to actually look into those '.cocci.patch' files. This makes the automated static analysis build job on Travis CI not particularly useful, because it neither draws our attention to Coccinelle's findings, nor shows the actual findings. Consequently, new topics introducing undesired code patterns graduated to master on several occasions without anyone noticing. The only way to draw attention in such an automated setting is to fail the build job. Therefore, modify the 'ci/run-static-analysis.sh' build script to check all the resulting '.cocci.patch' files, and fail the build job if any of them turns out to be not empty. Include those files' contents, i.e. Coccinelle's suggested transformations, in the build job's trace log, so we'll know why it failed. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	4ab8d1af33	travis-ci: run Coccinelle static analysis with two parallel jobs Currently the static analysis build job runs Coccinelle using a single 'make' job. Using two parallel jobs cuts down the build job's run time from around 10-12mins to 6-7mins, sometimes even under 6mins (there is quite large variation between build job runtimes). More than two parallel jobs don't seem to bring further runtime benefits. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	9cc2c76f5e	travis-ci: record and skip successfully built trees Travis CI dutifully builds and tests each new branch tip, even if its tree has previously been successfully built and tested. This happens often enough in contributors' workflows, when a work-in-progress branch is rebased changing e.g. only commit messages or the order or number of commits while leaving the resulting code intact, and is then pushed to a Travis CI-enabled GitHub fork. This is wasting Travis CI's resources and is sometimes scary-annoying when the new tip commit with a tree identical to the previous, successfully tested one is suddenly reported in red, because one of the OSX build jobs happened to exceed the time limit yet again. So extend our Travis CI build scripts to skip building commits whose trees have previously been successfully built and tested. Use the Travis CI cache feature to keep a record of the object names of trees that tested successfully, in a plain and simple flat text file, one line per tree object name. Append the current tree's object name at the end of every successful build job to this file, along with a bit of additional info about the build job (commit object name, Travis CI job number and id). Limit the size of this file to 1000 records, to prevent it from growing too large for git/git's forever living integration branches. Check, using a simple grep invocation, in each build job whether the current commit's tree is already in there, and skip the build if it is. Include a message in the skipped build job's trace log, containing the URL to the build job successfully testing that tree for the first time and instructions on how to force a re-build. Catch the case when a build job, which successfully built and tested a particular tree for the first time, is restarted and omit the URL of the previous build job's trace log, as in this case it's the same build job and the trace log has just been overwritten. Note: this won't kick in if two identical trees are on two different branches, because Travis CI caches are not shared between build jobs of different branches. Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	7 years ago
Lars Schneider	657343a602	travis-ci: move Travis CI code into dedicated scripts Most of the Travis CI commands are in the '.travis.yml'. The yml format does not support functions and therefore code duplication is necessary to run commands across all builds. To fix this, add a library for common CI functions. Move all Travis CI code into dedicated scripts and make them call the library first. Signed-off-by: Lars Schneider <larsxschneider@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	8 years ago