kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Elijah Newren	9a1b7474d6	sequencer: clear state upon dropping a become-empty commit In commit `e98c4269c8` ("rebase (interactive-backend): fix handling of commits that become empty", 2020-02-15), the merge backend was changed to drop commits that did not start empty but became so after being applied (because their changes were a subset of what was already upstream). This new code path did not need to go through the process of creating a commit, since we were dropping the commit instead. Unfortunately, this also means we bypassed the clearing of the CHERRY_PICK_HEAD and MERGE_MSG files, which if there were no further commits to cherry-pick would mean that the rebase would end but assume there was still an operation in progress. Ensure that we clear such state files when we decide to drop the commit. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Elijah Newren	c2417d3af7	rebase: drop '-i' from the reflog for interactive-based rebases A large variety of rebase types are supported by the interactive machinery, not just the explicitly interactive ones. These all share the same code and write the same reflog messages, but the "-i" moniker in those messages doesn't really have much meaning. It also becomes somewhat distracting once we switch the default from the am-backend to the interactive one. Just remove the "-i" from these messages. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Elijah Newren	8a997ed132	rebase, sequencer: remove the broken GIT_QUIET handling The GIT_QUIET environment variable was used to signal the non-am backends that the rebase should perform quietly. The preserve-merges backend does not make use of the quiet flag anywhere (other than to write out its state whenever it writes state), and this mechanism was broken in the conversion from shell to C. Since this environment variable was specifically designed for scripts and the only backend that would still use it is no longer a script, just gut this code. A subsequent commit will fix --quiet for the interactive/merge backend in a different way. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Elijah Newren	e98c4269c8	rebase (interactive-backend): fix handling of commits that become empty As established in the previous commit and commit `b00bf1c9a8` (git-rebase: make --allow-empty-message the default, 2018-06-27), the behavior for rebase with different backends in various edge or corner cases is often more happenstance than design. This commit addresses another such corner case: commits which "become empty". A careful reader may note that there are two types of commits which would become empty due to a rebase: * [clean cherry-pick] Commits which are clean cherry-picks of upstream commits, as determined by `git log --cherry-mark ...`. Re-applying these commits would result in an empty set of changes and a duplicative commit message; i.e. these are commits that have "already been applied" upstream. * [become empty] Commits which are not empty to start, are not clean cherry-picks of upstream commits, but which still become empty after being rebased. This happens e.g. when a commit has changes which are a strict subset of the changes in an upstream commit, or when the changes of a commit can be found spread across or among several upstream commits. Clearly, in both cases the changes in the commit in question are found upstream already, but the commit message may not be in the latter case. When cherry-mark can determine a commit is already upstream, then because of how cherry-mark works this means the upstream commit message was about the exact same set of changes. Thus, the commit messages can be assumed to be fully interchangeable (and are in fact likely to be completely identical). As such, the clean cherry-pick case represents a case when there is no information to be gained by keeping the extra commit around. All rebase types have always dropped these commits, and no one to my knowledge has ever requested that we do otherwise. For many of the become empty cases (and likely even most), we will also be able to drop the commit without loss of information -- but this isn't quite always the case. Since these commits represent cases that were not clean cherry-picks, there is no upstream commit message explaining the same set of changes. Projects with good commit message hygiene will likely have the explanation from our commit message contained within or spread among the relevant upstream commits, but not all projects run that way. As such, the commit message of the commit being rebased may have reasoning that suggests additional changes that should be made to adapt to the new base, or it may have information that someone wants to add as a note to another commit, or perhaps someone even wants to create an empty commit with the commit message as-is. Junio commented on the "become-empty" types of commits as follows[1]: WRT a change that ends up being empty (as opposed to a change that is empty from the beginning), I'd think that the current behaviour is desireable one. "am" based rebase is solely to transplant an existing history and want to stop much less than "interactive" one whose purpose is to polish a series before making it publishable, and asking for confirmation ("this has become empty--do you want to drop it?") is more appropriate from the workflow point of view. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/git/xmqqfu1fswdh.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/ I would simply add that his arguments for "am"-based rebases actually apply to all non-explicitly-interactive rebases. Also, since we are stating that different cases should have different defaults, it may be worth providing a flag to allow users to select which behavior they want for these commits. Introduce a new command line flag for selecting the desired behavior: --empty={drop,keep,ask} with the definitions: drop: drop commits which become empty keep: keep commits which become empty ask: provide the user a chance to interact and pick what to do with commits which become empty on a case-by-case basis In line with Junio's suggestion, if the --empty flag is not specified, pick defaults as follows: explicitly interactive: ask otherwise: drop Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Elijah Newren	d48e5e21da	rebase (interactive-backend): make --keep-empty the default Different rebase backends have different treatment for commits which start empty (i.e. have no changes relative to their parent), and the --keep-empty option was added at some point to allow adjusting behavior. The handling of commits which start empty is actually quite similar to commit `b00bf1c9a8` (git-rebase: make --allow-empty-message the default, 2018-06-27), which pointed out that the behavior for various backends is often more happenstance than design. The specific change made in that commit is actually quite relevant as well and much of the logic there directly applies here. It makes a lot of sense in 'git commit' to error out on the creation of empty commits, unless an override flag is provided. However, once someone determines that there is a rare case that merits using the manual override to create such a commit, it is somewhere between annoying and harmful to have to take extra steps to keep such intentional commits around. Granted, empty commits are quite rare, which is why handling of them doesn't get considered much and folks tend to defer to existing (accidental) behavior and assume there was a reason for it, leading them to just add flags (--keep-empty in this case) that allow them to override the bad defaults. Fix the interactive backend so that --keep-empty is the default, much like we did with --allow-empty-message. The am backend should also be fixed to have --keep-empty semantics for commits that start empty, but that is not included in this patch other than a testcase documenting the failure. Note that there was one test in t3421 which appears to have been written expecting --keep-empty to not be the default as correct behavior. This test was introduced in commit `00b8be5a4d` ("add tests for rebasing of empty commits", 2013-06-06), which was part of a series focusing on rebase topology and which had an interesting original cover letter at https://lore.kernel.org/git/1347949878-12578-1-git-send-email-martinvonz@gmail.com/ which noted Your input especially appreciated on whether you agree with the intent of the test cases. and then went into a long example about how one of the many tests added had several questions about whether it was correct. As such, I believe most the tests in that series were about testing rebase topology with as many different flags as possible and were not trying to state in general how those flags should behave otherwise. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Jeff King	d20bc01a51	avoid computing zero offsets from NULL pointer The Undefined Behavior Sanitizer in clang-11 seems to have learned a new trick: it complains about computing offsets from a NULL pointer, even if that offset is 0. This causes numerous test failures. For example, from t1090: unpack-trees.c:1355:41: runtime error: applying zero offset to null pointer ... not ok 6 - in partial clone, sparse checkout only fetches needed blobs The code in question looks like this: struct cache_entry **cache_end = cache + nr; ... while (cache != cache_end) and we sometimes pass in a NULL and 0 for "cache" and "nr". This is conceptually fine, as "cache_end" would be equal to "cache" in this case, and we wouldn't enter the loop at all. But computing even a zero offset violates the C standard. And given the fact that UBSan is noticing this behavior, this might be a potential problem spot if the compiler starts making unexpected assumptions based on undefined behavior. So let's just avoid it, which is pretty easy. In some cases we can just switch to iterating with a numeric index (as we do in sequencer.c here). In other cases (like the cache_end one) the use of an end pointer is more natural; we can keep that by just explicitly checking for the NULL/0 case when assigning the end pointer. Note that there are two ways you can write this latter case, checking for the pointer: cache_end = cache ? cache + nr : cache; or the size: cache_end = nr ? cache + nr : cache; For the case of a NULL/0 ptr/len combo, they are equivalent. But writing it the second way (as this patch does) has the property that if somebody were to incorrectly pass a NULL pointer with a non-zero length, we'd continue to notice and segfault, rather than silently pretending the length was zero. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Alban Gruin	5a5445d878	rebase-interactive: warn if commit is dropped with `rebase --edit-todo' When set to "warn" or "error", `rebase.missingCommitsCheck' would make `rebase -i' warn if the user removed commits from the todo list to prevent mistakes. Unfortunately, `rebase --edit-todo' and `rebase --continue' don't take it into account. This adds the ability for `rebase --edit-todo' and `rebase --continue' to check if commits were dropped by the user. As both edit_todo_list() and complete_action() parse the todo list and check for dropped commits, the code doing so in the latter is removed to reduce duplication. `edit_todo_list_advice' is removed from sequencer.c as it is no longer used there. This changes when a backup of the todo list is made. Until now, it was saved only once, before the initial edit. Now, it is also made if the original todo list has no errors or no dropped commits. Thus, the backup should be error-free. Without this, sequencer_continue() (`rebase --continue') could only compare the current todo list against the original, unedited list. Before this change, this file was only used by edit_todo_list() and `rebase -p' to create the backup before the initial edit, and check_todo_list_from_file(), only used by `rebase -p' to check for dropped commits after its own initial edit. If the edited list has an error, a file, `dropped', is created to report the issue. Otherwise, it is deleted. Usually, the edited list is compared against the list before editing, but if this file exists, it will be compared to the backup. Also, if the file exists, sequencer_continue() checks the list for dropped commits. If the check was performed every time, it would fail when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict, as the backup will contain commits that were picked, but they will not be in the new list. It's safe to ignore this check if `dropped' does not exist, because that means that no errors were found at the last edition, so any missing commits here have already been picked. Five tests are added to t3404. The tests for `rebase.missingCommitsCheck = warn' and `rebase.missingCommitsCheck = error' have a similar structure. First, we start a rebase with an incorrect command on the first line. Then, we edit the todo list, removing the first and the last lines. This demonstrates that `--edit-todo' notices dropped commits, but not when the command is incorrect. Then, we restore the original todo list, and edit it to remove the last line. This demonstrates that if we add a commit after the initial edit, then remove it, `--edit-todo' will notice that it has been dropped. Then, the actual rebase takes place. In the third test, it is also checked that `--continue' will refuse to resume the rebase if commits were dropped. The fourth test checks that no errors are raised when resuming a rebase after resolving a conflict, the fifth checks that no errors are raised when editing the todo list after pausing the rebase. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Alban Gruin	1da5874c1b	sequencer: move check_todo_list_from_file() to rebase-interactive.c The message contained in `edit_todo_list_advice' (sequencer.c) is printed after the initial edit of the todo list if it can't be parsed or if commits were dropped. This is done either in complete_action() for `rebase -i', or in check_todo_list_from_file() for `rebase -p'. Since we want to add this check when editing the list, we also want to use this message from edit_todo_list() (rebase-interactive.c). To this end, check_todo_list_from_file() is moved to rebase-interactive.c, and `edit_todo_list_advice' is copied there. In the next commit, complete_action() will stop using it, and `edit_todo_list_advice' will be removed from sequencer.c. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Alban Gruin	767a9c417e	rebase -i: stop checking out the tip of the branch to rebase One of the first things done when using a sequencer-based rebase (ie. `rebase -i', `rebase -r', or `rebase -m') is to make a todo list. This requires knowledge of the commit range to rebase. To get the oid of the last commit of the range, the tip of the branch to rebase is checked out with prepare_branch_to_be_rebased(), then the oid of the head is read. After this, the tip of the branch is not even modified. The `am' backend, on the other hand, does not check out the branch. On big repositories, it's a performance penalty: with `rebase -i', the user may have to wait before editing the todo list while git is extracting the branch silently, and "quiet" rebases will be slower than `am'. Since we already have the oid of the tip of the branch in `opts->orig_head', it's useless to switch to this commit. This removes the call to prepare_branch_to_be_rebased() in do_interactive_rebase(), and adds a `orig_head' parameter to get_revision_ranges(). prepare_branch_to_be_rebased() is removed as it is no longer used. This introduces a visible change: as we do not switch on the tip of the branch to rebase, no reflog entry is created at the beginning of the rebase for it. Unscientific performance measurements, performed on linux.git, are as follow: Before this patch: $ time git rebase -m --onto v4.18 463fa44eec2fef50~ 463fa44eec2fef50 real 0m8,940s user 0m6,830s sys 0m2,121s After this patch: $ time git rebase -m --onto v4.18 463fa44eec2fef50~ 463fa44eec2fef50 real 0m1,834s user 0m0,916s sys 0m0,206s Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	b6992261de	rebase -i: re-fix short SHA-1 collision In `66ae9a57b8` (t3404: rebase -i: demonstrate short SHA-1 collision, 2013-08-23), we added a test case that demonstrated how it is possible that a previously unambiguous short commit ID could become ambiguous during a rebase. In `75c6976655` (rebase -i: fix short SHA-1 collision, 2013-08-23), we fixed that problem simply by writing out the todo list with expanded commit IDs (except right before letting the user edit the todo list, in which case we shorten them, but we expand them right after the file was edited). However, the bug resurfaced as a side effect of `393adf7a6f` (sequencer: directly call pick_commits() from complete_action(), 2019-11-24): as of this commit, the sequencer no longer re-reads the todo list after writing it out with expanded commit IDs. The only redeeming factor is that the todo list is already parsed at that stage, including all the commits corresponding to the commands, therefore the sequencer can continue even if the internal todo list has short commit IDs. That does not prevent problems, though: the sequencer writes out the `done` and `git-rebase-todo` files incrementally (i.e. overwriting the todo list with a version that has _short_ commit IDs), and if a merge conflict happens, or if an `edit` or a `break` command is encountered, a subsequent `git rebase --continue` _will_ re-read the todo list, opening an opportunity for the "short SHA-1 collision" bug again. To avoid that, let's make sure that we do expand the commit IDs in the todo list as soon as we have parsed it after letting the user edit it. Additionally, we improve the 'short SHA-1 collide' test case in t3404 to test specifically for the case where the rebase is resumed. We also hard-code the expected colliding short SHA-1s, to document the expectation (and to make it easier on future readers). Note that we specifically test that the short commit ID is used in the `git-rebase-todo.tmp` file: this file is created by the fake editor in the test script and reflects the state that would have been presented to the user to edit. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	d859dcad94	parse_insn_line(): improve error message when parsing failed In the case that a `get_oid()` call failed, we showed some rather bogus part of the line instead of the precise string we sent to said function. That makes it rather hard for users to understand what is going wrong, so let's fix that. While at it, return a negative value from `parse_insn_line()` in case of an error, as per our convention. This function's only caller, `todo_list_parse_insn_buffer()`, cares only whether that return value is non-zero or not, i.e. does not need to be changed. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Junio C Hamano	4d924528d8	Revert "Merge branch 'ra/rebase-i-more-options'" This reverts commit `5d9324e0f4`, reversing changes made to `c58ae96fc4`. The topic turns out to be too buggy for real use. cf. <f2fe7437-8a48-3315-4d3f-8d51fe4bb8f1@gmail.com>	5 years ago
Alban Gruin	f6b9413baf	sequencer: fix a memory leak in sequencer_continue() When continuing an interactive rebase after a merge conflict was solved, if the resolution could not be committed, sequencer_continue() would return early without releasing its todo list, resulting in a memory leak. This plugs this leak by jumping to the end of the function, where the todo list is deallocated. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Alban Gruin	393adf7a6f	sequencer: directly call pick_commits() from complete_action() Currently, complete_action(), used by builtin/rebase.c to start a new rebase, calls sequencer_continue() to do it. Before the former calls pick_commits(), it - calls read_and_refresh_cache() -- this is unnecessary here as we've just called require_clean_work_tree() in complete_action() - calls read_populate_opts() -- this is unnecessary as we're starting a new rebase, so `opts' is fully populated - loads the todo list -- this is unnecessary as we've just populated the todo list in complete_action() - commits any staged changes -- this is unnecessary as we're starting a new rebase, so there are no staged changes - calls record_in_rewritten() -- this is unnecessary as we're starting a new rebase. This changes complete_action() to directly call pick_commits() to avoid these unnecessary steps. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Alban Gruin	3f34f2d8a4	sequencer: move the code writing total_nr on the disk to a new function The total number of commands can be used to show the progression of the rebasing in a shell. It is written to the disk by read_populate_todo() when the todo list is loaded from sequencer_continue() or pick_commits(), but not by complete_action(). This moves the part writing total_nr to a new function so it can be called from complete_action(). Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Alban Gruin	34065541e3	sequencer: update `done_nr' when skipping commands in a todo list In a todo list, `done_nr' is the number of commands that were executed or skipped, but skip_unnecessary_picks() did not update it. This variable is mostly used by command prompts (ie. git-prompt.sh and the like). As in the previous commit, this inconsistent behaviour is not a problem yet, but it would start to matter at the end of this series the same reason. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Alban Gruin	8638114e06	sequencer: update `total_nr' when adding an item to a todo list `total_nr' is the total number of items, counting both done and todo, that are in a todo list. But unlike `nr', it was not updated when an item was appended to the list. This variable is mostly used by command prompts (ie. git-prompt.sh and the like). By forgetting to update it, the original code made it not reflect the reality, but this flaw was masked by the code calling unnecessarily read_populate_todo() again to update the variable to its correct value. At the end of this series, the unnecessary call will be removed, and the inconsistency addressed by this patch would start to matter. Signed-off-by: Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
SZEDER Gábor	befd4f6a81	sequencer: don't re-read todo for revert and cherry-pick When 'git revert' or 'git cherry-pick --edit' is invoked with multiple commits, then after editing the first commit message is finished both these commands should continue with processing the second commit and launch another editor for its commit message, assuming there are no conflicts, of course. Alas, this inadvertently changed with commit `a47ba3c777` (rebase -i: check for updated todo after squash and reword, 2019-08-19): after editing the first commit message is finished, both 'git revert' and 'git cherry-pick --edit' exit with error, claiming that "nothing to commit, working tree clean". The reason for the changed behaviour is twofold: - Prior to `a47ba3c777` the up-to-dateness of the todo list file was only checked after 'exec' instructions, and that commit moved those checks to the common code path. The intention was that this check should be performed after instructions spawning an editor ('squash' and 'reword') as well, so the ongoing 'rebase -i' notices when the user runs a 'git rebase --edit-todo' while squashing/rewording a commit message. However, as it happened that check is now performed even after 'revert' and 'pick' instructions when they involved editing the commit message. And 'revert' by default while 'pick' optionally (with 'git cherry-pick --edit') involves editing the commit message. - When invoking 'git revert' or 'git cherry-pick --edit' with multiple commits they don't read a todo list file but assemble the todo list in memory, thus the associated stat data used to check whether the file has been updated is all zeroed out initially. Then the sequencer writes all instructions (including the very first) to the todo file, executes the first 'revert/pick' instruction, and after the user finished editing the commit message the changes of `a47ba3c777` kick in, and it checks whether the todo file has been modified. The initial all-zero stat data obviously differs from the todo file's current stat data, so the sequencer concludes that the file has been modified. Technically it is not wrong, of course, because the file just has been written indeed by the sequencer itself, though the file's contents still match what the sequencer was invoked with in the beginning. Consequently, after re-reading the todo file the sequencer executes the same first instruction _again_, thus ending up in that "nothing to commit" situation. The todo list was never meant to be edited during multi-commit 'git revert' or 'cherry-pick' operations, so perform that "has the todo file been modified" check only when the sequencer was invoked as part of an interactive rebase. Reported-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Phillip Wood	2d05ef2778	sequencer: fix empty commit check when amending This fixes a regression introduced in `356ee4659b` ("sequencer: try to commit without forking 'git commit'", 2017-11-24). When amending a commit try_to_commit() was using the wrong parent when checking if the commit would be empty. When amending we need to check against HEAD^ not HEAD. t3403 may not seem like the natural home for the new tests but a further patch series will improve the advice printed by `git commit`. That series will mutate these tests to check that the advice includes suggesting `rebase --skip` to skip the fixup that would empty the commit. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Doan Tran Cong Danh	e02058a729	sequencer: handle rebase-merges for "onto" message In order to work correctly, git-rebase --rebase-merges needs to make initial todo list with unique labels. Those unique labels is being handled by employing a hashmap and appending an unique number if any duplicate is found. But, we forget that beside those labels for side branches, we also have a special label `onto' for our so-called new-base. In a special case that any of those labels for side branches named `onto', git will run into trouble. Correct it. Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Matthew Rogers	cd5522271f	rebase -r: let `label` generate safer labels The `label` todo command in interactive rebases creates temporary refs in the `refs/rewritten/` namespace. These refs are stored as loose refs, i.e. as files in `.git/refs/rewritten/`, therefore they have to conform with file name limitations on the current filesystem in addition to the accepted ref format. This poses a problem in particular on NTFS/FAT, where e.g. the colon, double-quote and pipe characters are disallowed as part of a file name. Let's safeguard against this by replacing not only white-space characters by dashes, but all non-alpha-numeric ones. However, we exempt non-ASCII UTF-8 characters from that, as it should be quite possible to reflect branch names such as `↯↯↯` in refs/file names. Signed-off-by: Matthew Rogers <mattr94@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	867bc1d236	rebase-merges: move labels' whitespace mangling into `label_oid()` One of the trickier aspects of the design of `git rebase --rebase-merges` is the way labels are generated for the initial todo list: those labels are supposed to be intuitive and first and foremost unique. To that end, `label_oid()` appends a unique suffix when necessary. Those labels not only need to be unique, but they also need to be valid refs. To make sure of that, `make_script_with_merges()` replaces whitespace by dashes. That would appear to be the wrong layer for that sanitizing step, though: all callers of `label_oid()` should get that same benefit. Even if it does not make a difference currently (the only called of `label_oid()` that passes a label that might need to be sanitized _is_ `make_script_with_merges()`), let's move the responsibility for sanitizing labels into the `label_oid()` function. This commit is best viewed with `-w` because it unfortunately needs to change the indentation of a large block of code in `label_oid()`. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Doan Tran Cong Danh	52f52e5ae4	sequencer: reencode commit message for am/rebase --show-current-patch The message file will be used as commit message for the git-{am,rebase} --continue. Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Doan Tran Cong Danh	5772b0c745	sequencer: reencode old merge-commit message During rebasing, old merge's message (encoded in old encoding) will be used as message for new merge commit (created by rebase). In case of the value of i18n.commitencoding has been changed after the old merge time. We will receive an unusable message for this new merge. Correct it. This change also notice a breakage with git-rebase label system. Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Doan Tran Cong Danh	b375744274	sequencer: reencode squashing commit's message On fixup/squash-ing rebase, git will create new commit in i18n.commitencoding, reencode the commit message to that said encode. Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Doan Tran Cong Danh	019a9d8362	sequencer: reencode revert/cherry-pick's todo list Keep revert/cherry-pick's todo list in line with rebase todo list. Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Doan Tran Cong Danh	0798d16fe3	sequencer: reencode to utf-8 before arrange rebase's todo list On musl libc, ISO-2022-JP encoder is too eager to switch back to 1 byte encoding, musl's iconv always switch back after every combining character. Comparing glibc and musl's output for this command $ sed q t/t3900/ISO-2022-JP.txt\| iconv -f ISO-2022-JP -t utf-8 \| iconv -f utf-8 -t ISO-2022-JP \| xxd glibc: 00000000: 1b24 4224 4f24 6c24 5224 5b24 551b 2842 .$B$O$l$R$[$U.(B 00000010: 0a . musl: 00000000: 1b24 4224 4f1b 2842 1b24 4224 6c1b 2842 .$B$O.(B.$B$l.(B 00000010: 1b24 4224 521b 2842 1b24 4224 5b1b 2842 .$B$R.(B.$B$[.(B 00000020: 1b24 4224 551b 2842 0a .$B$U.(B. Although musl iconv's output isn't optimal, it's still correct. From commit `7d509878b8`, ("pretty.c: format string with truncate respects logOutputEncoding", 2014-05-21), we're encoding the message to utf-8 first, then format it and convert the message to the actual output encoding on git commit --squash. Thus, t3900::test_commit_autosquash_flags is failing on musl libc. Reencode to utf-8 before arranging rebase's todo list. By doing this, we also remove a breakage noticed by a test added in the previous commit. Signed-off-by: Doan Tran Cong Danh <congdanhqx@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Elijah Newren	15beaaa3d1	Fix spelling errors in code comments Reported-by: Jens Schleusener <Jens.Schleusener@fossies.org> Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Rohit Ashiwal	08187b4cba	rebase -i: support --ignore-date rebase am already has this flag to "lie" about the author date by changing it to the committer (current) date. Let's add the same for interactive machinery. Signed-off-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Rohit Ashiwal	0185c683c9	sequencer: rename amend_author to author_to_rename The purpose of amend_author was to free() the malloc()'d string obtained from get_author() while amending a commit. But we can also use the variable to free() the author at our convenience. Rename it to convey this meaning. Signed-off-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Rohit Ashiwal	cbd8db17ac	rebase -i: support --committer-date-is-author-date rebase am already has this flag to "lie" about the committer date by changing it to the author date. Let's add the same for interactive machinery. Signed-off-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Rohit Ashiwal	c068bcc59b	sequencer: allow callers of read_author_script() to ignore fields The current callers of the read_author_script() function read name, email and date from the author script. Allow callers to signal that they are not interested in some among these three fields by passing NULL. Note that fields that are ignored still must exist and be formatted correctly in the author script. Signed-off-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	5 years ago
Phillip Wood	4627bc777e	sequencer: run post-commit hook Prior to commit `356ee4659b` ("sequencer: try to commit without forking 'git commit'", 2017-11-24) the sequencer would always run the post-commit hook after each pick or revert as it forked `git commit` to create the commit. The conversion to committing without forking `git commit` omitted to call the post-commit hook after creating the commit. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Phillip Wood	49697cb721	move run_commit_hook() to libgit and use it there This function was declared in commit.h but was implemented in builtin/commit.c so was not part of libgit. Move it to libgit so we can use it in the sequencer. This simplifies the implementation of run_prepare_commit_msg_hook() and will be used in the next commit. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Eric Wong	c8e424c9c9	hashmap: introduce hashmap_free_entries `hashmap_free_entries' behaves like `container_of' and passes the offset of the hashmap_entry struct to the internal `hashmap_free_' function, allowing the function to free any struct pointer regardless of where the hashmap_entry field is located. `hashmap_free' no longer takes any arguments aside from the hashmap itself. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Eric Wong	939af16eac	hashmap_cmp_fn takes hashmap_entry params Another step in eliminating the requirement of hashmap_entry being the first member of a struct. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Eric Wong	f23a465132	hashmap_get{,_from_hash} return "struct hashmap_entry *" Update callers to use hashmap_get_entry, hashmap_get_entry_from_hash or container_of as appropriate. This is another step towards eliminating the requirement of hashmap_entry being the first field in a struct. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Eric Wong	26b455f21e	hashmap_put takes "struct hashmap_entry " This is less error-prone than "void " as the compiler now detects invalid types being passed. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Eric Wong	b94e5c1df6	hashmap_add takes "struct hashmap_entry " This is less error-prone than "void " as the compiler now detects invalid types being passed. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Eric Wong	d22245a2e3	hashmap_entry_init takes "struct hashmap_entry " C compilers do type checking to make life easier for us. So rely on that and update all hashmap_entry_init callers to take "struct hashmap_entry " to avoid future bugs while improving safety and readability. Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <e@80x24.org> Reviewed-by: Derrick Stolee <stolee@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Phillip Wood	b0a3186140	sequencer: simplify root commit creation Adapt try_to_commit() to create a new root commit rather than special casing this in run_git_commit(). This significantly reduces the amount of special case code for creating the root commit and reduces the number of commit code paths we have to worry about. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Phillip Wood	a47ba3c777	rebase -i: check for updated todo after squash and reword While a rebase is stopped for the user to edit a commit message it can be convenient for them to also edit the todo list. The scripted version of rebase supported this but the C version does not. We already check to see if the todo list has been updated by an exec command so extend this to rewords and squashes. It only costs a single stat call to do this so it should not affect the speed of the rebase (especially as it has just stopped for the user to edit a message) Note that for squashes the editor may be opened on a different pick to the squash itself as we edit the message at the end of a chain fixups and squashes. Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Phillip Wood	450efe2d53	rebase -i: always update HEAD before rewording If the user runs git log while rewording a commit it is confusing if sometimes we're amending the commit that's being reworded and at other times we're creating a new commit depending on whether we could fast-forward or not[1]. Fix this inconsistency by always committing the picked commit and then running 'git commit --amend' to do the reword. The first commit is performed by the sequencer without forking git commit and does not impact on the speed of rebase. In a test rewording 100 commits with GIT_EDITOR=true GIT_SEQUENCE_EDITOR='sed -i s/pick/reword/' \ ../bin-wrappers/git rebase -i --root and taking the best of three runs the current master took 957ms and with this patch it took 961ms. This change fixes rewording the new root commit when rearranging commits with --root. Note that the new code no longer updates CHERRY_PICK_HEAD after creating a root commit - I'm not sure why the old code was that creating that ref after a successful commit, everywhere else it is removed after a successful commit. [1] https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqlfvu4be3.fsf@gitster-ct.c.googlers.com/T/#m133009cb91cf0917bcf667300f061178be56680a Reported-by: SZEDER Gábor <szeder.dev@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@dunelm.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
brian m. carlson	4439c7a360	sequencer: convert to use the_hash_algo Convert several uses of GIT_SHA1_HEXSZ constants to be references to the_hash_algo. Signed-off-by: brian m. carlson <sandals@crustytoothpaste.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Elijah Newren	345480d1ed	merge-recursive: don't force external callers to do our logging Alternatively, you can view this as "make the merge functions behave more similarly." merge-recursive has three different entry points: merge_trees(), merge_recursive(), and merge_recursive_generic(). Two of these would call diff_warn_rename_limit(), but merge_trees() didn't. This lead to callers of merge_trees() needing to manually call diff_warn_rename_limit() themselves. Move this to the new merge_finalize() function to make sure that all three entry points run this function. Note that there are two external callers of merge_trees(), one in sequencer.c and one in builtin/checkout.c. The one in sequencer.c is cleaned up by this patch and just transfers where the call to diff_warn_rename_limit() is made; the one in builtin/checkout.c is for switching to a different commit and in the very rare case where the warning might be triggered, it would probably be helpful to include (e.g. if someone is modifying a file that has been renamed in moving to the other commit, but there are so many renames between the commits that the limit kicks in and none are detected, it may help to have an explanation about why they got a delete/modify conflict instead of a proper content merge in a renamed file). Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Elijah Newren	b4db8a2b76	merge-recursive: remove useless parameter in merge_trees() merge_trees() took a results parameter that would only be written when opt->call_depth was positive, which is never the case now that merge_trees_internal() has been split from merge_trees(). Remove the misleading and unused parameter from merge_trees(). While at it, add some comments explaining how the output of merge_trees() and merge_recursive() differ. Signed-off-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	e1fac531ea	rebase -r: do not (re-)generate root commits with `--root` and `--onto` When rebasing a complete commit history onto a given commit, it is pretty obvious that the root commits should be rebased on top of said given commit. To test this, let's kill two birds with one stone and add a test case to t3427-rebase-subtree.sh that not only demonstrates that this works, but also that `git rebase -r` works with merge strategies now. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	e145d99347	rebase -r: support merge strategies other than `recursive` We already support merge strategies in the sequencer, but only for `pick` commands. With this commit, we now also support them in `merge` commands. The approach is simple: if any merge strategy option is specified, or if any merge strategy other than `recursive` is specified, we simply spawn the `git merge` command. Otherwise, we handle the merge in-process just as before. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	68b54f669d	sequencer: the `am` and `rebase--interactive` scripts are gone Update a code comment that referred to those files as if they were still there. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago
Rohit Ashiwal	dcb500dc16	cherry-pick/revert: advise using --skip The previous commit introduced a --skip flag for cherry-pick and revert. Update the advice messages, to tell users about this less cumbersome way of skipping commits. Also add tests to ensure everything is working fine. Signed-off-by: Rohit Ashiwal <rohit.ashiwal265@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	6 years ago

1 2 3 4 5 ...

617 Commits (1ac83f42da6437d74098f162fcfa37474c94e223)