Fixed unmatched single quote introduced by commit:
* f56fffef9a sequencer: teach write_message() to append an optional LF
Signed-off-by: Jiang Xin <worldhello.net@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When clang compiles sequencer.c, it complains:
sequencer.c:632:14: warning: comparison of constant 2 with
expression of type 'const enum todo_command' is always
true [-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
if (command < ARRAY_SIZE(todo_command_strings))
This is because "command" is an enum that may only have two
values (0 and 1) and the array in question has two elements.
As it turns out, clang is actually wrong here, at least
according to its own bug tracker:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=16154
But it's still worth working around this, as the warning is
present with -Wall, meaning we fail compilation with "make
DEVELOPER=1".
Casting the enum to size_t sufficiently unconfuses clang. As
a bonus, it also catches any possible out-of-bounds access
if the enum takes on a negative value (which shouldn't
happen either, but again, this is a defensive check).
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
If i-t-a entries are present and there is no change between the index
and HEAD i-t-a entries, index_differs_from() still returns "dirty, new
entries" (aka, the resulting commit is not empty), but cache-tree will
skip i-t-a entries and produce the exact same tree of current
commit.
index_differs_from() is supposed to catch this so we can abort
git-commit (unless --no-empty is specified). Update it to optionally
ignore i-t-a entries when doing a diff between the index and HEAD so
that it would return "no change" in this case and abort commit.
Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There was actually only one error message that was not yet marked for
translation.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Quite a few error messages touched by this developer during the work to
speed up rebase -i started with an upper case letter, violating our
current conventions. Instead of sneaking in this fix (and forgetting
quite a few error messages), let's just have one wholesale patch fixing
all of the error messages in the sequencer.
While at it, the funny "error: Error wrapping up..." was changed to a
less funny, but more helpful, "error: failed to finalize...".
Pointed out by Junio Hamano.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This makes the code consistent by fixing quite a couple of error messages.
Suggested by Jakub Narębski.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The definition of this function goes back all the way to 043a449
(sequencer: factor code out of revert builtin, 2012-01-11), long before a
serious effort was made to translate all the error messages.
It is slightly out of the context of the current patch series (whose
purpose it is to re-implement the performance critical parts of the
interactive rebase in C) to make the error messages in the sequencer
translatable, but what the heck. We'll just do it while we're looking at
this part of the code.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The sequencer was introduced to make the cherry-pick and revert
functionality available as library function, with the original idea
being to extend the sequencer to also implement the rebase -i
functionality.
The test to ensure that all of the commands in the script are identical
to the overall operation does not mesh well with that.
Therefore let's disable the test in rebase -i mode.
While at it, error out early if the "instruction sheet" (i.e. the todo
script) could not be parsed.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This commit prepares for future callers that will have a pointer/length
to some text to be written that lacks an LF, yet an LF is desired.
Instead of requiring the caller to append an LF to the buffer (and
potentially allocate memory to do so), the write_message() function
learns to append an LF at the end of the file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, we required an strbuf. But that limits the use case too much.
In the upcoming patch series (for which the current patch series prepares
the sequencer), we will want to write content to a file for which we have
a pointer and a length, not an strbuf.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
There is no need to wait until the atexit() handler kicks in at the end.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Nothing in the name "write_message()" suggests that the function
releases the strbuf passed to it. So let's release the strbuf in the
caller instead.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Interactive rebase's scripts may be indented; we need to handle this
case, too, now that we prepare the sequencer to process interactive
rebases.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The run_git_commit() function already knows how to amend commits, and
with this new option, it can also clean up commit messages (i.e. strip
out commented lines). This is needed to implement rebase -i's 'fixup'
and 'squash' commands as sequencer commands.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This teaches the run_git_commit() function to take an argument that will
allow us to implement "todo" commands that need to amend the commit
messages ("fixup", "squash" and "reword").
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In the upcoming commits, we will implement more and more of rebase -i's
functionality inside the sequencer. One particular feature of the
commands to come is that some of them allow editing the commit message
while others don't, i.e. we cannot define in the replay_opts whether the
commit message should be edited or not.
Let's add a new parameter to the run_git_commit() function. Previously,
it was the duty of the caller to ensure that the opts->edit setting
indicates whether to let the user edit the commit message or not,
indicating that it is an "all or nothing" setting, i.e. that the
sequencer wants to let the user edit *all* commit message, or none at
all. In the upcoming rebase -i mode, it will depend on the particular
command that is currently executed, though.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
As we are slowly teaching the sequencer to perform the hard work for
the interactive rebase, we need to read files that were written by
shell scripts.
These files typically contain a single line and are invariably ended
by a line feed (and possibly a carriage return before that). Let's use
a helper to read such files and to remove the line ending.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In interactive rebases, we commit a little bit differently than the
sequencer did so far: we heed the "author-script", the "message" and the
"amend" files in the .git/rebase-merge/ subdirectory.
Likewise, we may want to edit the commit message *even* when providing a
file containing the suggested commit message. Therefore we change the
code to not even provide a default message when we do not want any, and
to call the editor explicitly.
Also, in "interactive rebase" mode we want to skip reading the options
in the state directory of the cherry-pick/revert commands.
Finally, as interactive rebase's GPG settings are configured differently
from how cherry-pick (and therefore sequencer) handles them, we will
leave support for that to the next commit.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The `git-rebase-todo` file contains a list of commands. Most of those
commands have the form
<verb> <sha1> <oneline>
The <oneline> is displayed primarily for the user's convenience, as
rebase -i really interprets only the <verb> <sha1> part. However, there
are *some* places in interactive rebase where the <oneline> is used to
display messages, e.g. for reporting at which commit we stopped.
So let's just remember it when parsing the todo file; we keep a copy of
the entire todo file anyway (to write out the new `done` and
`git-rebase-todo` file just before processing each command), so all we
need to do is remember the begin offsets and lengths.
As we will have to parse and remember the command-line for `exec` commands
later, we do not call the field "oneline" but rather "arg" (and will reuse
that for exec's command-line).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The subcommands are used exactly once, at the very beginning of
sequencer_pick_revisions(), to determine what to do. This is an
unnecessary level of indirection: we can simply call the correct
function to begin with. So let's do that.
While at it, ensure that the subcommands return an error code so that
they do not have to die() all over the place (bad practice for library
functions...).
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
It is not unheard of that editors on Windows write CR/LF even if the
file originally had only LF. This is particularly awkward for exec lines
of a rebase -i todo sheet. Take for example the insn "exec echo": The
shell script parser splits at the LF and leaves the CR attached to
"echo", which leads to the unknown command "echo\r".
Work around that by stripping CR when reading the todo commands, as we
already do for LF.
This happens to fix t9903.14 and .15 in MSYS1 environments (with the
rebase--helper patches based on this patch series): the todo script
constructed in such a setup contains CR/LF thanks to MSYS1 runtime's
cleverness.
Based on a report and a patch by Johannes Sixt.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When we came up with the "sequencer" idea, we really wanted to have
kind of a plumbing equivalent of the interactive rebase. Hence the
choice of words: the "todo" script, a "pick", etc.
However, when it came time to implement the entire shebang, somehow this
idea got lost and the sequencer was used as working horse for
cherry-pick and revert instead. So as not to interfere with the
interactive rebase, it even uses a separate directory to store its
state.
Furthermore, it also is stupidly strict about the "todo" script it
accepts: while it parses commands in a way that was *designed* to be
similar to the interactive rebase, it then goes on to *error out* if the
commands disagree with the overall action (cherry-pick or revert).
Finally, the sequencer code chose to deviate from the interactive rebase
code insofar that when it comes to writing the file with the remaining
commands, it *reformats* the "todo" script instead of just writing the
part of the parsed script that were not yet processed. This is not only
unnecessary churn, but might well lose information that is valuable to
the user (i.e. comments after the commands).
Let's just bite the bullet and rewrite the entire parser; the code now
becomes not only more elegant: it allows us to go on and teach the
sequencer how to parse *true* "todo" scripts as used by the interactive
rebase itself. In a way, the sequencer is about to grow up to do its
older brother's job. Better.
In particular, we choose to maintain the list of commands in an array
instead of a linked list: this is flexible enough to allow us later on to
even implement rebase -i's reordering of fixup!/squash! commits very
easily (and with a very nice speed bonus, at least on Windows).
While at it, do not stop at the first problem, but list *all* of the
problems. This will help the user when the sequencer will do `rebase
-i`'s work by allowing to address all issues in one go rather than going
back and forth until the todo list is valid.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Not only does this DRY up the code (providing a better documentation what
the code is about, as well as allowing to change the behavior in a single
place), it also makes it substantially shorter to use the same
functionality in functions to be introduced when we teach the sequencer to
process interactive-rebase's git-rebase-todo file.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Over the next commits, we will work on improving the sequencer to the
point where it can process the todo script of an interactive rebase. To
that end, we will need to teach the sequencer to read interactive
rebase's todo file. In preparation, we consolidate all places where
that todo file is needed to call a function that we will later extend.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The sequencer is our attempt to lib-ify cherry-pick. Yet it behaves
like a one-shot command when it reads its configuration: memory is
allocated and released only when the command exits.
This is kind of okay for git-cherry-pick, which *is* a one-shot
command. All the work to make the sequencer its work horse was
done to allow using the functionality as a library function, though,
including proper clean-up after use.
To remedy that, take custody of the option values in question,
allocating and duping literal constants as needed and freeing them
at end.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In a couple of commits, we will teach the sequencer to handle the
nitty gritty of the interactive rebase, which keeps its state in a
different directory.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
We really do not need the *pointer to a* pointer to the options in
the read_populate_opts() function.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A future caller of read_and_refresh_cache() may want to do more than just
print some helpful advice in case of failure.
Suggested by Junio Hamano.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of fast_forward_to(), do_pick_commit() already checks
the return value and passes it on to its callers, so its caller must
be already prepared to handle error returns, and with this step, we
make it notice an error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make fast_forward_to() callable from
new callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of save_opts(), sequencer_pick_revisions() can already
return errors, so its caller must be already prepared to handle error
returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error return from
this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make save_opts() callable from new
callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of save_todo(), pick_commits() can already return
errors, so its caller must be already prepared to handle error
returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error return from
this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make save_todo() callable
from new callers that want it not to die, without changing the
external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of save_head(), sequencer_pick_revisions() can already
return errors, so its caller must be already prepared to handle error
returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error return from
this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make save_head() callable from new
callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of create_seq_dir(), sequencer_pick_revisions() can
already return errors, so its caller must be already prepared to
handle error returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error
return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make create_seq_dir() callable from
new callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of read_populate_opts(), sequencer_continue() can
already return errors, so its caller must be already prepared to
handle error returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error
return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make read_populate_opts() callable
from new callers that want it not to die, without changing the
external behaviour of anything existing.
Note that the function git_config_from_file(), called from
read_populate_opts(), can currently still die() (in git_parse_source(),
because the do_config_from_file() function sets die_on_error = 1). We do
not try to fix that here, as it would have larger ramifications on the
config code, and we also assume that we write the opts file
programmatically, hence any parse errors would be bugs.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of read_populate_todo(), sequencer_continue() can
already return errors, so its caller must be already prepared to
handle error returns, and with this step, we make it notice an
error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make read_populate_todo() callable
from new callers that want it not to die, without changing the
external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
There are two call sites of read_and_refresh_cache(), one of which is
pick_commits(), whose callers were already prepared to do the right
thing given an "error" return from it by an earlier patch, so the
conversion is safe.
The other one, sequencer_pick_revisions() was also prepared to relay
an error return back to its caller in all remaining cases in an
earlier patch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of prepare_revs(), walk_revs_populate_todo() was just
taught to return errors, after verifying that its callers are prepared
to handle error returns, and with this step, we make it notice an
error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make prepare_revs() callable from new
callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The function sequencer_pick_revisions() is the only caller of
walk_revs_populate_todo(), and it already returns errors
appropriately, so its caller must be already prepared to handle error
returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error return from
this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make walk_revs_populate_todo()
callable from new callers that want it not to die, without changing
the external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only two callers of do_pick_commit(), pick_commits() and
single_pick() already check the return value and pass it on to their
callers, so their callers must be already prepared to handle error
returns, and with this step, we make it notice an error return from
this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make do_pick_commit() callable from
new callers that want it not to die, without changing the external
behaviour of anything existing.
While at it, remove the superfluous space.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of do_recursive_merge(), do_pick_commit() already
checks the return value and passes it on to its callers, so its caller
must be already prepared to handle error returns, and with this step,
we make it notice an error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make do_recursive_merge() callable
from new callers that want it not to die, without changing the
external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The only caller of write_message(), do_pick_commit() already checks
the return value and passes it on to its callers, so its caller must
be already prepared to handle error returns, and with this step, we
make it notice an error return from this function.
So this is a safe conversion to make write_message() callable
from new callers that want it not to die, without changing the
external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain
notice the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The eventual caller of do_pick_commit() is sequencer_pick_revisions(),
which already relays a reported error from its helper functions
(including this one), and both of its two callers know how to react to
a negative return correctly.
So this makes do_pick_commit() callable from new callers that want it
not to die, without changing the external behaviour of anything
existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Instead of dying there, let the caller high up in the callchain notice
the error and handle it (by dying, still).
The function sequencer_pick_revisions() has only two callers,
cmd_revert() and cmd_cherry_pick(), both of which check the return
value and react appropriately upon errors.
So this is a safe conversion to make sequencer_pick_revisions()
callable from new callers that want it not to die, without changing
the external behaviour of anything existing.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Call strbuf_addstr() for adding a simple string to a strbuf instead of
using the heavier strbuf_addf(). This is shorter and documents the
intent more clearly.
Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <l.s.r@web.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The recursive merge machinery accumulates its output in an output
buffer, to be flushed at the end of merge_recursive(). At this point,
we forgot to release the output buffer.
When calling merge_trees() (i.e. the non-recursive part of the recursive
merge) directly, the output buffer is never flushed because the caller
may be merge_recursive() which wants to flush the output itself.
For the same reason, merge_trees() cannot release the output buffer: it
may still be needed.
Forgetting to release the output buffer did not matter much when running
git-checkout, or git-merge-recursive, because we exited after the
operation anyway. Ever since cherry-pick learned to pick a commit range,
however, this memory leak had the potential of becoming a problem.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Previously, callers of merge_trees() or merge_recursive() expected that
code to die() with an error message. This used to be okay because we
called those commands from scripts, and had a chance to print out a
message in case the command failed fatally (read: with exit code 128).
As scripting incurs its own set of problems (portability, speed,
idiosyncrasies of different shells, limited data structures leading to
inefficient code), we are converting more and more of these scripts into
builtins, using library functions directly.
We already tried to use merge_recursive() directly in the builtin
git-am, for example. Unfortunately, we had to roll it back temporarily
because some of the code in merge-recursive.c still deemed it okay to
call die(), when the builtin am code really wanted to print out a useful
advice after the merge failed fatally. In the next commits, we want to
fix that.
The code touched by this commit expected merge_trees() to die() with
some useful message when there is an error condition, but merge_trees()
is going to be improved by converting all die() calls to return error()
instead (i.e. return value -1 after printing out the message as before),
so that the caller can react more flexibly.
This is a step to prepare for the version of merge_trees() that no
longer dies, even if we just imitate the previous behavior by calling
exit(128): this is what callers of e.g. `git merge` have come to expect.
Note that the callers of the sequencer (revert and cherry-pick) already
fail fast even for the return value -1; The only difference is that they
now get a chance to say "<command> failed".
A caller of merge_trees() might want handle error messages themselves
(or even suppress them). As this patch is already complex enough, we
leave that change for a later patch.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Just like we already taught the find_commit_subject() function (to make
it consistent with the code in pretty.c), we now simply skip leading
blank lines of the commit message.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Jiang Xin