kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jens Lehmann	95c16418f0	rm: delete .gitmodules entry of submodules removed from the work tree Currently using "git rm" on a submodule removes the submodule's work tree from that of the superproject and the gitlink from the index. But the submodule's section in .gitmodules is left untouched, which is a leftover of the now removed submodule and might irritate users (as opposed to the setting in .git/config, this must stay as a reminder that the user showed interest in this submodule so it will be repopulated later when an older commit is checked out). Let "git rm" help the user by not only removing the submodule from the work tree but by also removing the "submodule.<submodule name>" section from the .gitmodules file and stage both. This doesn't happen when the "--cached" option is used, as it would modify the work tree. This also silently does nothing when no .gitmodules file is found and only issues a warning when it doesn't have a section for this submodule. This is because the user might just use plain gitlinks without the .gitmodules file or has already removed the section by hand before issuing the "git rm" command (in which case the warning reminds him that rm would have done that for him). Only when .gitmodules is found and contains merge conflicts the rm command will fail and tell the user to resolve the conflict before trying again. Also extend the man page to inform the user about this new feature. While at it promote the submodule sub-section to a chapter as it made not much sense under "REMOVING FILES THAT HAVE DISAPPEARED FROM THE FILESYSTEM". In t7610 three uses of "git rm submod" had to be replaced with "git rm --cached submod" because that test expects .gitmodules and the work tree to stay untouched. Also in t7400 the tests for the remaining settings in the .gitmodules file had to be changed to assert that these settings are missing. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
Jens Lehmann	0656781fad	mv: update the path entry in .gitmodules for moved submodules Currently using "git mv" on a submodule moves the submodule's work tree in that of the superproject. But the submodule's path setting in .gitmodules is left untouched, which is now inconsistent with the work tree and makes git commands that rely on the proper path -> name mapping (like status and diff) behave strangely. Let "git mv" help here by not only moving the submodule's work tree but also updating the "submodule.<submodule name>.path" setting from the .gitmodules file and stage both. This doesn't happen when no .gitmodules file is found and only issues a warning when it doesn't have a section for this submodule. This is because the user might just use plain gitlinks without the .gitmodules file or has already updated the path setting by hand before issuing the "git mv" command (in which case the warning reminds him that mv would have done that for him). Only when .gitmodules is found and contains merge conflicts the mv command will fail and tell the user to resolve the conflict before trying again. Also extend the man page to inform the user about this new feature. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
Jens Lehmann	5fee995244	submodule.c: add .gitmodules staging helper functions Add the new is_staging_gitmodules_ok() and stage_updated_gitmodules() functions to submodule.c. The first makes it possible for call sites to see if the .gitmodules file did contain any unstaged modifications they would accidentally stage in addition to those they intend to stage themselves. The second function stages all modifications to the .gitmodules file, both will be used by subsequent patches for the mv and rm commands. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
Jens Lehmann	a88c915de9	mv: move submodules using a gitfile When moving a submodule which uses a gitfile to point to the git directory stored in .git/modules/<name> of the superproject two changes must be made to make the submodule work: the .git file and the core.worktree setting must be adjusted to point from work tree to git directory and back. Achieve that by remembering which submodule uses a gitfile by storing the result of read_gitfile() of each submodule. If that is not NULL the new function connect_work_tree_and_git_dir() is called after renaming the submodule's work tree which updates the two settings to the new values. Extend the man page to inform the user about that feature (and while at it change the description to not talk about a script anymore, as mv is a builtin for quite some time now). Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
John Keeping	0f33a0677d	submodule: print graph output next to submodule log When running "git log -p --submodule=log", the submodule log is not indented by the graph output, although all other lines are. Fix this by prepending the current line prefix to each line of the submodule log. Signed-off-by: John Keeping <john@keeping.me.uk> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
Ramkumar Ramachandra	4e215131d2	submodule: display summary header in bold Currently, 'git diff --submodule' displays output with a bold diff header for non-submodules. So this part is in bold: diff --git a/file1 b/file1 index 30b2f6c..2638038 100644 --- a/file1 +++ b/file1 For submodules, the header looks like this: Submodule submodule1 012b072..248d0fd: Unfortunately, it's easy to miss in the output because it's not bold. Change this. Signed-off-by: Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com> Acked-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
Jens Lehmann	293ab15eea	submodule: teach rm to remove submodules unless they contain a git directory Currently using "git rm" on a submodule - populated or not - fails with this error: fatal: git rm: '<submodule path>': Is a directory This made sense in the past as there was no way to remove a submodule without possibly removing unpushed parts of the submodule's history contained in its .git directory too, so erroring out here protected the user from possible loss of data. But submodules cloned with a recent git version do not contain the .git directory anymore, they use a gitfile to point to their git directory which is safely stored inside the superproject's .git directory. The work tree of these submodules can safely be removed without losing history, so let's teach git to do so. Using rm on an unpopulated submodule now removes the empty directory from the work tree and the gitlink from the index. If the submodule's directory is missing from the work tree, it will still be removed from the index. Using rm on a populated submodule using a gitfile will apply the usual checks for work tree modification adapted to submodules (unless forced). For a submodule that means that the HEAD is the same as recorded in the index, no tracked files are modified and no untracked files that aren't ignored are present in the submodules work tree (ignored files are deemed expendable and won't stop a submodule's work tree from being removed). That logic has to be applied in all nested submodules too. Using rm on a submodule which has its .git directory inside the work trees top level directory will just error out like it did before to protect the repository, even when forced. In the future git could either provide a message informing the user to convert the submodule to use a gitfile or even attempt to do the conversion itself, but that is not part of this change. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
Jens Lehmann	50d89ad654	submodule: use argv_array instead of hand-building arrays fetch_populated_submodules() allocates the full argv array it uses to recurse into the submodules from the number of given options plus the six argv values it is going to add. It then initializes it with those values which won't change during the iteration and copies the given options into it. Inside the loop the two argv values different for each submodule get replaced with those currently valid. However, this technique is brittle and error-prone (as the comment to explain the magic number 6 indicates), so let's replace it with an argv_array. Instead of replacing the argv values, push them to the argv_array just before the run_command() call (including the option separating them) and pop them from the argv_array right after that. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	13 years ago
René Scharfe	c2df7585ef	submodule: fix prototype of gitmodules_config Add void to make it match its definition in submodule.c. Signed-off-by: Rene Scharfe <rene.scharfe@lsrfire.ath.cx> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	13 years ago
Heiko Voigt	eb21c732d6	push: teach --recurse-submodules the on-demand option When using this option git will search for all submodules that have changed in the revisions to be send. It will then try to push the currently checked out branch of each submodule. This helps when a user has finished working on a change which involves submodules and just wants to push everything in one go. Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	13 years ago
Heiko Voigt	a762e51ef2	Refactor submodule push check to use string list instead of integer This allows us to tell the user which submodules have not been pushed. Additionally this is helpful when we want to automatically try to push submodules that have not been pushed. Signed-off-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	13 years ago
Brad King	80988783c8	submodule: Search for merges only at end of recursive merge The submodule merge search is not useful during virtual merges because the results cannot be used automatically. Furthermore any suggestions made by the search may apply to commits different than HEAD:sub and MERGE_HEAD:sub, thus confusing the user. Skip searching for submodule merges during a virtual merge such as that between B and C while merging the heads of: B---BC / \ / A X \ / \ C---CB Run the search only when the recursion level is zero (!o->call_depth). This fixes known breakage tested in t7405-submodule-merge. Signed-off-by: Brad King <brad.king@kitware.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	13 years ago
Fredrik Gustafsson	d2b17b3220	push: Don't push a repository with unpushed submodules When working with submodules it is easy to forget to push a submodule to the server but pushing a super-project that contains a commit for that submodule. The result is that the superproject points at a submodule commit that is not available on the server. This adds the option --recurse-submodules=check to push. When using this option git will check that all submodule commits that are about to be pushed are present on a remote of the submodule. To be able to use a combined diff, disabling a diff callback has been removed from combined-diff.c. Signed-off-by: Fredrik Gustafsson <iveqy@iveqy.com> Mentored-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Mentored-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	14 years ago
Jens Lehmann	8f0700dd33	fetch/pull: Add the 'on-demand' value to the --recurse-submodules option Until now the --recurse-submodules option could only be used to either fetch all populated submodules recursively or to disable recursion completely. As fetch and pull now by default just fetch those submodules for which new commits have been fetched in the superproject, a command line option to enforce that behavior is needed to be able to override configuration settings. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	14 years ago
Jens Lehmann	88a21979c5	fetch/pull: recurse into submodules when necessary To be able to access all commits of populated submodules referenced by the superproject it is sufficient to only then let "git fetch" recurse into a submodule when the new commits fetched in the superproject record new commits for it. Having these commits present is extremely useful when using the "--submodule" option to "git diff" (which is what "git gui" and "gitk" do since 1.6.6), as all submodule commits needed for creating a descriptive output can be accessed. Also merging submodule commits (added in 1.7.3) depends on the submodule commits in question being present to work. Last but not least this enables disconnected operation when using submodules, as all commits necessary for a successful "git submodule update -N" will have been fetched automatically. So we choose this mode as the default for fetch and pull. Before a new or changed ref from upstream is updated in update_local_ref() "git rev-list <new-sha1> --not --branches --remotes" is used to determine all newly fetched commits. These are then walked and diffed against their parent(s) to see if a submodule has been changed. If that is the case, its path is stored to be fetched after the superproject fetch is completed. Using the "--recurse-submodules" or the "--no-recurse-submodules" option disables the examination of the fetched refs because the result will be ignored anyway. There is currently no infrastructure for storing deleted and new submodules in the .git directory of the superproject. That's why fetch and pull for now only fetch submodules that are already checked out and are not renamed. In t7403 the "--no-recurse-submodules" argument had to be added to "git pull" to avoid failure because of the moved upstream submodule repo. Thanks-to: Jonathan Nieder <jrnieder@gmail.com> Thanks-to: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	14 years ago
Jens Lehmann	be254a0ea9	Add the 'fetch.recurseSubmodules' config setting This new boolean option can be used to override the default for "git fetch" and "git pull", which is to not recurse into populated submodules and fetch all new commits there too. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	14 years ago
Jens Lehmann	7dce19d374	fetch/pull: Add the --recurse-submodules option Until now you had to call "git submodule update" (without -N\|--no-fetch option) or something like "git submodule foreach git fetch" to fetch new commits in populated submodules from their remote. This could lead to "(commits not present)" messages in the output of "git diff --submodule" (which is used by "git gui" and "gitk") after fetching or pulling new commits in the superproject and is an obstacle for implementing recursive checkout of submodules. Also "git submodule update" cannot fetch changes when disconnected, so it was very easy to forget to fetch the submodule changes before disconnecting only to discover later that they are needed. This patch adds the "--recurse-submodules" option to recursively fetch each populated submodule from the url configured in the .git/config of the submodule at the end of each "git fetch" or during "git pull" in the superproject. The submodule paths are taken from the index. The hidden option "--submodule-prefix" is added to "git fetch" to be able to print out the full paths of nested submodules. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	14 years ago
Jens Lehmann	302ad7a993	Submodules: Use "ignore" settings from .gitmodules too for diff and status The .gitmodules file is parsed for "submodule.<name>.ignore" entries before looking for them in .git/config. Thus settings found in .git/config will override those from .gitmodules, thereby allowing the local developer to ignore settings given by the remote side while also letting upstream set defaults for those users who don't have special needs. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Jens Lehmann	aee9c7d654	Submodules: Add the new "ignore" config option for diff and status The new "ignore" config option controls the default behavior for "git status" and the diff family. It specifies under what circumstances they consider submodules as modified and can be set separately for each submodule. The command line option "--ignore-submodules=" has been extended to accept the new parameter "none" for both status and diff. Users that chose submodules to get rid of long work tree scanning times might want to set the "dirty" option for those submodules. This brings back the pre 1.7.0 behavior, where submodule work trees were never scanned for modifications. By using "--ignore-submodules=none" on the command line the status and diff commands can be told to do a full scan. This option can be set to the following values (which have the same name and meaning as for the "--ignore-submodules" option of status and diff): "all": All changes to the submodule will be ignored. "dirty": Only differences of the commit recorded in the superproject and the submodules HEAD will be considered modifications, all changes to the work tree of the submodule will be ignored. When using this value, the submodule will not be scanned for work tree changes at all, leading to a performance benefit on large submodules. "untracked": Only untracked files in the submodules work tree are ignored, a changed HEAD and/or modified files in the submodule will mark it as modified. "none" (which is the default): Either untracked or modified files in a submodules work tree or a difference between the subdmodules HEAD and the commit recorded in the superproject will make it show up as changed. This value is added as a new parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option of the diff family and "git status" so the user can override the settings in the configuration. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Heiko Voigt	68d03e4a6e	Implement automatic fast-forward merge for submodules This implements a simple merge strategy for submodule hashes. We check whether one side of the merge candidates is already contained in the other and then merge automatically. If both sides contain changes we search for a merge in the submodule. In case a single one exists we check that out and suggest it as the merge resolution. A list of candidates is returned when we find multiple merges that contain both sides of the changes. This is useful for a workflow in which the developers can publish topic branches in submodules and a separate maintainer merges them. In case the developers always wait until their branch gets merged before tracking them in the superproject all merges of branches that contain submodule changes will be resolved automatically. If developers choose to track their feature branch the maintainer might get a conflict but git will search the submodule for a merge and suggest it/them as a resolution. Signed-off-by: Heiko Voigt <hvoigt@hvoigt.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Jens Lehmann	46a958b3da	Add the option "--ignore-submodules" to "git status" In some use cases it is not desirable that "git status" considers submodules that only contain untracked content as dirty. This may happen e.g. when the submodule is not under the developers control and not all build generated files have been added to .gitignore by the upstream developers. Using the "untracked" parameter for the "--ignore-submodules" option disables checking for untracked content and lets git diff report them as changed only when they have new commits or modified content. Sometimes it is not wanted to have submodules show up as changed when they just contain changes to their work tree (this was the behavior before 1.7.0). An example for that are scripts which just want to check for submodule commits while ignoring any changes to the work tree. Also users having large submodules known not to change might want to use this option, as the - sometimes substantial - time it takes to scan the submodule work tree(s) is saved when using the "dirty" parameter. And if you want to ignore any changes to submodules, you can now do that by using this option without parameters or with "all" (when the config option status.submodulesummary is set, using "all" will also suppress the output of the submodule summary). A new function handle_ignore_submodules_arg() is introduced to parse this option new to "git status" in a single location, as "git diff" already knew it. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Jens Lehmann	3bfc450476	git status: ignoring untracked files must apply to submodules too Since 1.7.0 submodules are considered dirty when they contain untracked files. But when git status is called with the "-uno" option, the user asked to ignore untracked files, so they must be ignored in submodules too. To achieve this, the new flag DIFF_OPT_IGNORE_UNTRACKED_IN_SUBMODULES is introduced. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Jens Lehmann	c7e1a73641	git diff --submodule: Show detailed dirty status of submodules When encountering a dirty submodule while doing "git diff --submodule" print an extra line for new untracked content and another for modified but already tracked content. And if the HEAD of the submodule is equal to the ref diffed against in the superproject, drop the output which would just show the same SHA1s and no commit message headlines. To achieve that, the dirty_submodule bitfield is expanded to two bits. The output of "git status" inside the submodule is parsed to set the according bits. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Jens Lehmann	721ceec1ad	Teach diff --submodule that modified submodule directory is dirty Since commit 8e08b4 git diff does append "-dirty" to the work tree side if the working directory of a submodule contains new or modified files. Lets do the same when the --submodule option is used. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Jens Lehmann	ee6fc514f2	Show submodules as modified when they contain a dirty work tree Until now a submodule only then showed up as modified in the supermodule when the last commit in the submodule differed from the one in the index or the diffed against commit of the superproject. A dirty work tree containing new untracked or modified files in a submodule was undetectable when looking at it from the superproject. Now git status and git diff (against the work tree) in the superproject will also display submodules as modified when they contain untracked or modified files, even if the compared ref matches the HEAD of the submodule. Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Nanako Shiraishi <nanako3@lavabit.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	752c0c2492	Add the --submodule option to the diff option family When you use the option --submodule=log you can see the submodule summaries inlined in the diff, instead of not-quite-helpful SHA-1 pairs. The format imitates what "git submodule summary" shows. To do that, <path>/.git/objects/ is added to the alternate object databases (if that directory exists). This option was requested by Jens Lehmann at the GitTogether in Berlin. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Jens Lehmann <Jens.Lehmann@web.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago

29 Commits (11c6659d85d72273a4161c8779123147b52fbcb2)