The description was meant to emphasizes that the project should remain
usable even if the filter driver was not used. This makes it more explicit
and removes the "here is rope to hang yourself" paraphrase.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The order in which 'ident' and 'crlf' are carried out is documented a few paragraphs
later again, after 'filter' was introduced.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <johannes.sixt@telecom.at>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Rework the introduction to the Submodules section to explain why
someone would use them, and fix up submodule references from the
tree-object and todo sections.
Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com>
Acked-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without this, the value passed to sendmail would have an extra set of
single quotes. At least exim's sendmail emulation would object to that:
exim: bad -f address "'list-addr@example.org'": malformed address: ' \
may not follow 'list-addr@example.org
error: hooks/post-receive exited with error code 1
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Without this, the extra output produced e.g., by "make --debug"
would go into $INSTLIBDIR and then cause the sed command to fail.
Signed-off-by: Jim Meyering <jim@meyering.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The git-send-email command line in the test was missing a single hyphen.
Signed-off-by: Glenn Rempe <glenn@rempe.us>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
In 'commitdiff' view, for the merge commit, there is an extra header
for the difftree table, with links to commitdiffs to individual
parents. Do not show such header when there is nothing to show, for
trivial merges.
This means that for trivial merge you have to go to 'commit' view
to get links to diffs to each parent.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
In commit 90921740bd
"gitweb: Split git_patchset_body into separate subroutines"
a part of git_patchset_body code was separated into parse_from_to_diffinfo
subroutine. But instead of replacing the separated code by the call to
mentioned subroutine, the call to subroutine was placed before the separated
code. This patch removes parse_from_to_diffinfo code from git_patchset_body
subroutine.
Signed-off-by: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Even though config_pager() unset the $pager variable, we were
blindly calling exec() on it through run_pager().
Noticed-by: Chris Moore <christopher.ian.moore@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
A lot of shell scripts contained stuff starting with
while case "$#" in 0) break ;; esac
and similar. I consider breaking out of the condition instead of the
body od the loop ugly, and the implied "true" value of the
non-matching case is not really obvious to humans at first glance. It
happens not to be obvious to some BSD shells, either, but that's
because they are not POSIX-compliant. In most cases, this has been
replaced by a straight condition using "test". "case" has the
advantage of being faster than "test" on vintage shells where "test"
is not a builtin. Since none of them is likely to run the git
scripts, anyway, the added readability should be worth the change.
A few loops have had their termination condition expressed
differently.
Signed-off-by: David Kastrup <dak@gnu.org>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Smith <msmith@cbnco.com>
Signed-off-by: Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@frugalware.org>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The scripts taken from Tony Luck's howto assume all refs can be found
under .git/refs, but this is not necessarily true, especially since
git-gc runs git-pack-refs.
Also add a note warning of this in the chapter that introduces refs, and
fix the same incorrect assumption in one other spot.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
If we are using Cygwin and the git repository is actually a
workdir (by way of git-new-workdir) but this Tcl process is
a native Tcl/Tk and not the Cygwin Tcl/Tk then we are unable
to traverse the .git/info path as it is a Cygwin symlink and
not a standard Windows directory.
So we actually need to start a Cygwin process that can do the
path translation for us and let it test for .git/info/exclude
so we know if we can include that file in our git-ls-files or
not.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I really cannot explain Cygwin's behavior here but if we start
git-gui through Cygwin on a local drive it appears that Cygwin
is leaving $env(PATH) in Unix style, even if it started a native
(non-Cygwin) Tcl/Tk process to run git-gui. Yet starting that
same git-gui and Tcl/Tk combination through Cygwin on a network
share causes it to automatically convert $env(PATH) into Windows
style, which broke our internal "which" implementation.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
If we cannot find the git executable in the user's $PATH then
we cannot function correctly. Because we need that to get the
version so we can load our library correctly we cannot rely on
the library function "error_popup" here, as this is all running
before the library path has been configured, so error_popup is
not available to us.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
I only did this back when I wanted to make sure git-log and gitk work
properly with non Occidental characters. There is really no reason to
keep it around.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The example provided with the update-hook-example does not work on
either bash 2.05b.0(1)-release nor 3.1.17(1)-release. The matcher did
not match the lines that it advertised to match, such as:
refs/heads/bw/ linus
refs/heads/tmp/* *
In POSIX 1003.2 regular expressions, the star (*), is not an wildcard
meaning "match everything", it matches 0 or more matches of the atom
preceding it.
So to match "refs/heads/bw/topic-branch", the matcher should be written
as "refs/heads/bw/.*" to match "refs/heads/bw/" and everything after it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
This section has not been updated in a while and
--branches/--tags/--trunk options are commonly used nowadays.
Noticed-by: Lars Hjemli <hjemli@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@yhbt.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Earlier commit ece7b74903 added a test
for rebase that uses "am -3", but this adds a test to check "am -3"
itself.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Commit 098e711e caused git-push to match only branches when
considering which refs to push. This patch updates the
documentation accordingly and adds a test for this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Some people seem to create SVN branch names with spaces
or other shell metacharacters.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Urlichs <smurf@smurf.noris.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Because a partial commit is meant to be a way to ignore what are
staged in the index, "git rm --cached A && git commit A" should
just record what is in A on the filesystem. The previous patch
made the command sequence to barf, saying that A has not been
added yet. This fixes it.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
When making a partial commit, git-commit uses git-ls-files with
the --error-unmatch option to expand and sanity check the user
supplied path patterns. When any path pattern does not match
with the paths known to the index, it errors out, in order to
catch a common mistake to say "git commit Makefiel cache.h"
and end up with a commit that touches only cache.h (notice the
misspelled "Makefile"). This detection however does not work
well when the path has already been removed from the index.
If you drop a path from the index and try to commit that
partially, i.e.
$ git rm COPYING
$ git commit -m 'Remove COPYING' COPYING
the command complains because git does not know anything about
COPYING anymore.
This introduces a new option --with-tree to git-ls-files and
uses it in git-commit when we build a temporary index to
write a tree object for the partial commit.
When --with-tree=<tree-ish> option is specified, names from the
given tree are added to the set of names the index knows about,
so we can treat COPYING file in the example as known.
Of course, there is no reason to use "git rm" and git-aware
people have long time done:
$ rm COPYING
$ git commit -m 'Remove COPYING' COPYING
which works just fine. But this caused a constant confusion.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* 'maint' of git://repo.or.cz/git-gui:
git-gui: Disable native platform text selection in "lists"
git-gui: Paper bag fix "Commit->Revert" format arguments
git-gui: Provide 'uninstall' Makefile target to undo an installation
git-gui: Font chooser to handle a large number of font families
git-gui: Make backporting changes from i18n version easier
git-gui: Don't delete send on Windows as it doesn't exist
git-gui: Trim trailing slashes from untracked submodule names
git-gui: Assume untracked directories are Git submodules
git-gui: handle "deleted symlink" diff marker
git-gui: show unstaged symlinks in diff viewer
git-gui: Avoid use of libdir in Makefile
git-gui: Disable Tk send in all git-gui sessions
git-gui: lib/index.tcl: handle files with % in the filename properly
git-gui: Properly set the state of "Stage/Unstage Hunk" action
git-gui: Fix detaching current branch during checkout
git-gui: Correct starting of git-remote to handle -w option
Earlier code took Unix time and appended a few random digits.
If you are firing off many messages within a second, you could
issue the same id to different messages, which is a no-no. If
you send out 31 messages within a single second, with random
integer taken out of rand(4200), you have about 10% chance of
producing the same message ID.
This fixes the problem by uses a prefix string which is
constant-per-invocation (time and pid), with a serial number for
each message generated by the process appended at the end.
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
The algorithm isn't right here: it accumulates any set of 8 spaces into
tabs even if they're separated by tabs, so
<four spaces><tab><four spaces><tab>
is converted to
<tab><tab><tab>
when it should be just
<tab><tab>
So teach git-apply that a tab hides any group of less than 8 previous
spaces in a row.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Sometimes we use a Tk text widget as though it were a listbox.
This happens typically when we want to show an icon to the left
of the text label or just when a text widget is generally a better
choice then the native listbox widget.
In these cases if we want the user to have control over the selection
we implement our own "in_sel" tag that shows the selected region
and we perform our own selection management in the background
via keybindings and mouse bindings. In such uses we don't want
the user to be able to activate the native platform selection by
dragging their mouse through the text widget. Doing so creates a
very confusing display and the user is left wondering what it may
mean to have two different types of selection in the same widget.
Tk doesn't allow us to delete the "sel" tag that it uses internally
to manage the native selection but it will allow us to make it
invisible by setting the tag to have the same display properties
as unselected text. So long as we don't actually use the "sel"
tag for anything in code its effectively invisible.
Signed-off-by: Shawn O. Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>
"git diff" does not record index lines for pure mode changes (i.e. no
lines changed). Therefore, apply --index-info would call out a bogus
error.
Instead, fall back to reading the info from the current index.
Incidentally, this fixes an error where git-rebase would not rebase a
commit including a pure mode change, and changes requiring a threeway
merge.
Noticed and later tested by Chris Shoemaker.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
* 'maint' of git://linux-nfs.org/~bfields/git:
core-tutorial: minor cleanup
documentation: replace Discussion section by link to user-manual chapter
user-manual: todo updates and cleanup
user-manual: fix introduction to packfiles
user-manual: move packfile and dangling object discussion
user-manual: rewrite object database discussion
user-manual: reorder commit, blob, tree discussion
user-manual: rewrite index discussion
user-manual: create new "low-level git operations" chapter
user-manual: rename "git internals" to "git concepts"
user-manual: move object format details to hacking-git chapter
user-manual: adjust section levels in "git internals"
Revise the introduction for concision, add pointers to the tutorial and
user manual as appropriate, delete cvsimport note from the end, as that
work's been done elsewhere already.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The "Discussion" section has a lot of useful information, but is a
little wordy, especially for an already-long man page, and is designed
for an audience more of potential git hackers than users, which probably
doesn't make as much sense as git matures. Also, I (perhaps foolishly)
forked a version in the user manual, which has been significantly
rewritten in an attempt to address some of the above problems.
So, remove this section and replace it by a (very terse) summary of the
original material--my attempt at the World's Shortest Git Overview--and
a reference to the appropriate chapter of the user manual. It's
unfortunate to remove something that's been in this place for a long
time, as some people may still depend on finding it there. But I think
we'll want to do this some day anyway.
Cc: Andreas Ericsson <ae@op5.se>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Actually I don't think we've previously mentioned .git/objects, so we
need a different introduction here.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Rewrite the introduction. Rewrite each section completely to make them
work in the new order, to add some examples, and to move plumbing
commands (like git-commit-tree) to the following chapter.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The bottom-up blog, tree, commit order makes sense unless you want to
give explicit examples--it's easier to discover objects to examine if
you go in the other order....,
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Add an example using git-ls-files, standardize on the new "index"
terminology (as opposed to "cache"), attempt to clarify discussion and
make it a little shorter, avoid some unnecessary jargon ("write-back
cache").
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
The low-level index operations aren't as important to regular users as
the rest of this "git concepts" chapter; so move it into a separate
chapter, and do some minor cleanup.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
"git internals" sounds like something only git developers must know
about, but this stuff should be of wider interest. Rename the chapter
and give it a slightly friendlier introduction.
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@citi.umich.edu>
Johannes Sixt