kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Jeff King	cd1957f5fc	pretty: give placeholders to reflog identity When doing a reflog walk, you can get some information about the reflog (such as the subject line), but not the identity information (i.e., name and email). Let's make those available, mimicing the options for author and committer identity. Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	13 years ago
Thomas Rast	8f8f5476cd	Introduce new pretty formats %g[sdD] for reflog information Add three new --pretty=format escapes: %gD long reflog descriptor (e.g. refs/stash@{0}) %gd short reflog descriptor (e.g. stash@{0}) %gs reflog message This is achieved by passing down the reflog info, if any, inside the pretty_print_context struct. We use the newly refactored get_reflog_selector(), and give it some extra functionality to extract a shortened ref. The shortening is cached inside the commit_reflogs struct; the only allocation of it happens in read_complete_reflog(), where it is initialised to 0. Also add another helper get_reflog_message() for the message extraction. Note that the --format="%h %gD: %gs" tests may not work in real repositories, as the --pretty formatter doesn't know to leave away the ": " on the last commit in an incomplete (because git-gc removed the old part) reflog. This equivalence is nevertheless the main goal of this patch. Thanks to Jeff King for reviews, the %gd testcase and documentation. Signed-off-by: Thomas Rast <trast@student.ethz.ch> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Jeff King	cd4371208a	make oneline reflog dates more consistent with multiline format The multiline reflog format (e.g., as shown by "git log -g") will show HEAD@{<date>} rather than HEAD@{<count>} in two situations: 1. If the user gave branch@{<date>} syntax to specify the reflog 2. If the user gave a --date=<format> specifier It uses the "normal" date format in case 1, and the user-specified format in case 2. The oneline reflog format (e.g., "git reflog show" or "git log -g --oneline") will show the date in the same two circumstances. However, it _always_ shows the date as a relative date, and it always ignores the timezone. In case 2, it seems ridiculous to trigger the date but use a format totally different from what the user requested. For case 1, it is arguable that the user might want to see the relative date by default; however, the multiline version shows the normal format. This patch does three things: - refactors the "relative_date" parameter to show_reflog_message to be an actual date_mode enum, since this is how it is used (it is passed to show_date) - uses the passed date_mode parameter in the oneline format (making it consistent with the multiline format) - does not ignore the timezone parameter in oneline mode Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	16 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	7b69b873fa	git log -g: Complain, but do not fail, when no reflogs are there When asking "git log -g --all", clearly you want to see only those refs that do have reflogs, but you do not want it to fail, either. So instead of die()ing, complain about it, but move on to the other refs. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	18 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	4e244cbc5c	log --reflog: honour --relative-date If you say "git log -g --relative-date", it is very likely that you want to see the reflog names in terms of a relative date. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Junio C Hamano	4d12a47123	Fix --walk-reflog with --pretty=oneline Now, "git log --abbrev-commit --pretty=o --walk-reflogs HEAD" is reasonably pleasant to use. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago
Johannes Schindelin	8860fd42fc	Teach the revision walker to walk by reflogs with --walk-reflogs When called with "--walk-reflogs", as long as there are reflogs available, the walker will take this information into account, rather than the parent information in the commit object. Signed-off-by: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>	18 years ago