kernel/git - git - PowerEL Git System

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Junio C Hamano	09c2cb877a	pull: pass --allow-unrelated-histories to "git merge" The previous commit said: We could add the same option to "git pull" and have it passed through to underlying "git merge". I do not have a fundamental opposition against such a feature, but this commit does not do so and instead leaves it as low-hanging fruit for others, because such a "two project merge" would be done after fetching the other project into some location in the working tree of an existing project and making sure how well they fit together, it is sufficient to allow a local merge without such an option pass-through from "git pull" to "git merge". Prepare a patch to make it a reality, just in case it is needed. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	9 years ago
Paul Tan	eb2a8d9ed3	pull: handle git-fetch's options as well While parsing the command-line arguments, git-pull stops parsing at the first unrecognized option, assuming that any subsequent options are for git-fetch, and can thus be kept in the shell's positional parameters list, so that it can be passed to git-fetch via the expansion of "$@". However, certain functions in git-pull assume that the positional parameters do not contain any options: * error_on_no_merge_candidates() uses the number of positional parameters to determine which error message to print out, and will thus print the wrong message if git-fetch's options are passed in as well. * the call to get_remote_merge_branch() assumes that the positional parameters only contains the optional repo and refspecs, and will thus silently fail if git-fetch's options are passed in as well. * --dry-run is a valid git-fetch option, but if provided after any git-fetch options, it is not recognized by git-pull and thus git-pull will continue to run the merge or rebase. Fix these bugs by teaching git-pull to parse git-fetch's options as well. Add tests to prevent regressions. This removes the limitation where git-fetch's options have to come after git-merge's and git-rebase's options on the command line. Update the documentation to reflect this. Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Paul Tan	5504f13a7c	t5521: test --dry-run does not make any changes Test that when --dry-run is provided to git-pull, it does not make any changes, namely: * --dry-run gets passed to git-fetch, so no FETCH_HEAD will be created and no refs will be fetched. * The index and work tree will not be modified. Signed-off-by: Paul Tan <pyokagan@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	10 years ago
Junio C Hamano	ca8d148daf	test: test_must_be_empty helper There are quite a lot places where an output file is expected to be empty, and we fail the test when it is not. The output from running the test script with -i -v can be helped if we showed the unexpected contents at that point. We could of course do >expected.empty && test_cmp expected.empty actual but this is commmon enough to be done with a dedicated helper. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
Peter Eisentraut	ce4c4d4ec3	pull: Apply -q and -v options to rebase mode as well git pull passed -q and -v only to git merge, but they can be useful for git rebase as well, so pass them there, too. In particular, using -q shuts up the "Already up-to-date." message. Especially, a new test script runs the same "pull --rebase" twice to make sure both cases are quiet, when it has something to fetch and when it is already up to date. Signed-off-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	12 years ago
Junio C Hamano	e6cc51046f	fetch --all/--multiple: keep all the fetched branch information Since "git fetch" learned "--all" and "--multiple" options, it has become tempting for users to say "git pull --all". Even though it may fetch from remotes that do not need to be fetched from for merging with the current branch, it is handy. "git fetch" however clears the list of fetched branches every time it contacts a different remote. Unless the current branch is configured to merge with a branch from a remote that happens to be the last in the list of remotes that are contacted, "git pull" that fetches from multiple remotes will not be able to find the branch it should be merging with. Make "fetch" clear FETCH_HEAD (unless --append is given) and then append the list of branches fetched to it (even when --append is not given). That way, "pull" will be able to find the data for the branch being merged in FETCH_HEAD no matter where the remote appears in the list of remotes to be contacted by "git fetch". Reported-by: Michael Lukashov Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Junio C Hamano	bba5322a71	builtin-fetch --all/--multi: propagate options correctly When running a subfetch, the code propagated some options but not others. Propagate --force, --update-head-ok and --keep options as well. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Junio C Hamano	13e65fe631	t5521: fix and modernize All of these tests were bogus, as they created new directory and tried to run "git pull" without even running "git init" in there. They were mucking with the repository in $TEST_DIRECTORY. While fixing it, modernize the style not to chdir around outside of subshell. Otherwise a failed test will take us to an unexpected directory and we need to chdir back to the test directory in each test, which is ugly and error prone. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	15 years ago
Tuncer Ayaz	7f87aff22c	Teach/Fix pull/fetch -q/-v options Implement git-pull --quiet and git-pull --verbose by adding the options to git-pull and fixing verbosity handling in git-fetch. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>	17 years ago