Browse Source
Since the "a..b c..d" syntax is interpreted as "b ^a d ^c" as other range-ish commands, if you want to format a..b and then c..d and end up with files consecutively numbered, the second run needs to be able to tell the command what number to start from. This does not imply --numbered (which gives [PATCH n/m] to the subject). Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>maint
Johannes Schindelin
19 years ago
committed by
Junio C Hamano
1 changed files with 13 additions and 3 deletions
Loading…
Reference in new issue