From cc400f50112a58471b992a54b1a05d99a8a82457 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Christian Couder Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 10:07:26 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] mktag: call "check_sha1_signature" with the replacement sha1 Otherwise we get a "sha1 mismatch" error for replaced objects. Note that I am not sure at all that this is a good change. It may be that we should just refuse to tag a replaced object. But in this case we should probably give a meaningfull error message instead of "sha1 mismatch". Signed-off-by: Christian Couder Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano --- mktag.c | 7 ++++--- t/t6050-replace.sh | 12 ++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mktag.c b/mktag.c index 99a356e9ee..6e0b5feaee 100644 --- a/mktag.c +++ b/mktag.c @@ -19,16 +19,17 @@ /* * We refuse to tag something we can't verify. Just because. */ -static int verify_object(unsigned char *sha1, const char *expected_type) +static int verify_object(const unsigned char *sha1, const char *expected_type) { int ret = -1; enum object_type type; unsigned long size; - void *buffer = read_sha1_file(sha1, &type, &size); + const unsigned char *repl; + void *buffer = read_sha1_file_repl(sha1, &type, &size, &repl); if (buffer) { if (type == type_from_string(expected_type)) - ret = check_sha1_signature(sha1, buffer, size, expected_type); + ret = check_sha1_signature(repl, buffer, size, expected_type); free(buffer); } return ret; diff --git a/t/t6050-replace.sh b/t/t6050-replace.sh index 0a585ecda7..334aed6216 100755 --- a/t/t6050-replace.sh +++ b/t/t6050-replace.sh @@ -70,6 +70,18 @@ test_expect_success 'replace the author' ' git show $HASH2 | grep "O Thor" ' +cat >tag.sig < 0 +0000 + +EOF + +test_expect_success 'tag replaced commit' ' + git mktag .git/refs/tags/mytag 2>message +' + # # test_done