Browse Source
HPA suggests it is simply silly to imitate Linux versioning scheme where the leading "2" does not mean anything anymore, and I tend to agree. The first feature release after 1.0.0 will be 1.1.0, and the development path leading to 1.1.0 will carry 1.0.GIT as the version number from now on. Similarly, the third maintenance release that follows 1.0.0 will not be 1.0.0c as planned, but will be called 1.0.3. The "maint" branch will merge in fixes and immediately tagged, so there is no need for 1.0.2.GIT that is in between 1.0.2 (aka 1.0.0b) and 1.0.3. Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>maint
Junio C Hamano
19 years ago
2 changed files with 7 additions and 1 deletions
Loading…
Reference in new issue