Browse Source
Change the bitfield added inmaint58300f4743
(sparse-index: add index.sparse config option, 2021-03-30) and3964fc2aae
(sparse-index: add guard to ensure full index, 2021-03-30) to just use an "int" boolean instead. It might be smart to optimize the space here in the future, but by consistently using an "int" we can take its address and pass it to repo_cfg_bool(), and therefore don't need to handle "sparse_index" as a special-case when reading the "index.sparse" setting. There's no corresponding config for "command_requires_full_index", but let's change it too for consistency and to prevent future bugs creeping in due to one of these being "unsigned". Using "int" consistently also prevents subtle bugs or undesired control flow creeping in here. Before the preceding commit the initialization of "command_requires_full_index" in prepare_repo_settings() did nothing, i.e. this: r->settings.command_requires_full_index = 1 Was redundant to the earlier memset() to -1. Likewise for "sparse_index" added in58300f4743
(sparse-index: add index.sparse config option, 2021-03-30) the code and comment added there was misleading, we weren't initializing it to off, but re-initializing it from "1" to "0", and then finally checking the config, and perhaps setting it to "1" again. I.e. we could have applied this patch before the preceding commit: + assert(r->settings.command_requires_full_index == 1); r->settings.command_requires_full_index = 1; /* * Initialize this as off. */ + assert(r->settings.sparse_index == 1); r->settings.sparse_index = 0; if (!repo_config_get_bool(r, "index.sparse", &value) && value) r->settings.sparse_index = 1; Signed-off-by: Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>


2 changed files with 3 additions and 10 deletions
Loading…
Reference in new issue