Browse Source
When changing the scope of a sparse-checkout using cone mode, we might have some tracked directories go out of scope. The current logic removes the tracked files from within those directories, but leaves the ignored files within those directories. This is a bit unexpected to users who have given input to Git saying they don't need those directories anymore. This is something that is new to the cone mode pattern type: the user has explicitly said "I want these directories and _not_ those directories." The typical sparse-checkout patterns more generally apply to "I want files with with these patterns" so it is natural to leave ignored files as they are. This focus on directories in cone mode provides us an opportunity to change the behavior. Leaving these ignored files in the sparse directories makes it impossible to gain performance benefits in the sparse index. When we track into these directories, we need to know if the files are ignored or not, which might depend on the _tracked_ .gitignore file(s) within the sparse directory. This depends on the indexed version of the file, so the sparse directory must be expanded. We must take special care to look for untracked, non-ignored files in these directories before deleting them. We do not want to delete any meaningful work that the users were doing in those directories and perhaps forgot to add and commit before switching sparse-checkout definitions. Since those untracked files might be code files that generated ignored build output, also do not delete any ignored files from these directories in that case. The users can recover their state by resetting their sparse-checkout definition to include that directory and continue. Alternatively, they can see the warning that is presented and delete the directory themselves to regain the performance they expect. By deleting the sparse directories when changing scope (or running 'git sparse-checkout reapply') we regain these performance benefits as if the repository was in a clean state. Since these ignored files are frequently build output or helper files from IDEs, the users should not need the files now that the tracked files are removed. If the tracked files reappear, then they will have newer timestamps than the build artifacts, so the artifacts will need to be regenerated anyway. Use the sparse-index as a data structure in order to find the sparse directories that can be safely deleted. Re-expand the index to a full one if it was full before. Signed-off-by: Derrick Stolee <dstolee@microsoft.com> Reviewed-by: Elijah Newren <newren@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>maint
Derrick Stolee
3 years ago
committed by
Junio C Hamano
3 changed files with 163 additions and 0 deletions
Loading…
Reference in new issue