Browse Source

sha1_loose_object_info(): do not return success on missing object

Since 052fe5ea (sha1_loose_object_info: make type lookup optional,
2013-07-12), sha1_loose_object_info() returns happily without
checking if the object in question exists, which is not what the the
caller sha1_object_info_extended() expects; the caller does not even
bother checking the existence of the object itself.

Noticed-by: Sven Brauch <svenbrauch@googlemail.com>
Helped-by: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
maint
Junio C Hamano 12 years ago
parent
commit
4ef8d1dd03
  1. 15
      sha1_file.c
  2. 6
      t/t1006-cat-file.sh

15
sha1_file.c

@ -2413,15 +2413,18 @@ static int sha1_loose_object_info(const unsigned char *sha1, @@ -2413,15 +2413,18 @@ static int sha1_loose_object_info(const unsigned char *sha1,

/*
* If we don't care about type or size, then we don't
* need to look inside the object at all.
* need to look inside the object at all. Note that we
* do not optimize out the stat call, even if the
* caller doesn't care about the disk-size, since our
* return value implicitly indicates whether the
* object even exists.
*/
if (!oi->typep && !oi->sizep) {
if (oi->disk_sizep) {
struct stat st;
if (stat_sha1_file(sha1, &st) < 0)
return -1;
struct stat st;
if (stat_sha1_file(sha1, &st) < 0)
return -1;
if (oi->disk_sizep)
*oi->disk_sizep = st.st_size;
}
return 0;
}


6
t/t1006-cat-file.sh

@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ test_expect_success "--batch-check for an emtpy line" ' @@ -179,6 +179,12 @@ test_expect_success "--batch-check for an emtpy line" '
test " missing" = "$(echo | git cat-file --batch-check)"
'

test_expect_success 'empty --batch-check notices missing object' '
echo "$_z40 missing" >expect &&
echo "$_z40" | git cat-file --batch-check="" >actual &&
test_cmp expect actual
'

batch_input="$hello_sha1
$commit_sha1
$tag_sha1

Loading…
Cancel
Save