doc: git-merge: link to new merge conflicts guide

All of the info about merge conflicts has been moved to the new guide

Signed-off-by: Julia Evans <julia@jvns.ca>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
seen
Julia Evans 2026-10-12 14:53:11 +00:00 committed by Junio C Hamano
parent a957f40694
commit 4a1237aa8a
1 changed files with 3 additions and 122 deletions

View File

@ -49,7 +49,8 @@ a log message from the user describing the changes. Before the operation,
A merge stops if there's a conflict that cannot be resolved
automatically or if `--no-commit` was provided when initiating the
merge. At that point you can run `git merge --abort` or `git merge
--continue`.
--continue`. See linkgit:gitmergeconflicts[7]
(or `git help mergeconflicts`) for a guide to handling merge conflicts.

`git merge --abort` will abort the merge process and try to reconstruct
the pre-merge state. However, if there were uncommitted changes when the
@ -231,127 +232,6 @@ git merge v1.2.3^0
git merge --ff-only v1.2.3
----

HOW CONFLICTS ARE PRESENTED
---------------------------

During a merge, the working tree files are updated to reflect the result
of the merge. Among the changes made to the common ancestor's version,
non-overlapping ones (that is, you changed an area of the file while the
other side left that area intact, or vice versa) are incorporated in the
final result verbatim. When both sides made changes to the same area,
however, Git cannot randomly pick one side over the other, and asks you to
resolve it by leaving what both sides did to that area.

By default, Git uses the same style as the one used by the "merge" program
from the RCS suite to present such a conflicted hunk, like this:

------------
Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed,
or cleanly resolved because both sides changed the same way.
<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
Conflict resolution is hard;
let's go shopping.
=======
Git makes conflict resolution easy.
>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
------------

The area where a pair of conflicting changes happened is marked with markers
+<<<<<<<+, `=======`, and +>>>>>>>+. The part before the `=======`
is typically your side, and the part afterwards is typically their side.

The default format does not show what the original said in the conflicting
area. You cannot tell how many lines are deleted and replaced with
Barbie's remark on your side. The only thing you can tell is that your
side wants to say it is hard and you'd prefer to go shopping, while the
other side wants to claim it is easy.

An alternative style can be used by setting the `merge.conflictStyle`
configuration variable to either `diff3` or `zdiff3`. In `diff3`
style, the above conflict may look like this:

------------
Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed,
<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
or cleanly resolved because both sides changed the same way.
Conflict resolution is hard;
let's go shopping.
||||||| base:sample.txt
or cleanly resolved because both sides changed identically.
Conflict resolution is hard.
=======
or cleanly resolved because both sides changed the same way.
Git makes conflict resolution easy.
>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
------------

while in `zdiff3` style, it may look like this:

------------
Here are lines that are either unchanged from the common
ancestor, or cleanly resolved because only one side changed,
or cleanly resolved because both sides changed the same way.
<<<<<<< yours:sample.txt
Conflict resolution is hard;
let's go shopping.
||||||| base:sample.txt
or cleanly resolved because both sides changed identically.
Conflict resolution is hard.
=======
Git makes conflict resolution easy.
>>>>>>> theirs:sample.txt
And here is another line that is cleanly resolved or unmodified.
------------

In addition to the +<<<<<<<+, `=======`, and +>>>>>>>+ markers, it uses
another +|||||||+ marker that is followed by the original text. You can
tell that the original just stated a fact, and your side simply gave in to
that statement and gave up, while the other side tried to have a more
positive attitude. You can sometimes come up with a better resolution by
viewing the original.


HOW TO RESOLVE CONFLICTS
------------------------

After seeing a conflict, you can do two things:

* Decide not to merge. The only clean-ups you need are to reset
the index file to the `HEAD` commit to reverse 2. and to clean
up working tree changes made by 2. and 3.; `git merge --abort`
can be used for this.

* Resolve the conflicts. Git will mark the conflicts in
the working tree. Edit the files into shape and
`git add` them to the index. Use `git commit` or
`git merge --continue` to seal the deal. The latter command
checks whether there is a (interrupted) merge in progress
before calling `git commit`.

You can work through the conflict with a number of tools:

* Use a mergetool. `git mergetool` to launch a graphical
mergetool which will work through the merge with you.

* Look at the diffs. `git diff` will show a three-way diff,
highlighting changes from both the `HEAD` and `MERGE_HEAD`
versions. `git diff AUTO_MERGE` will show what changes you've
made so far to resolve textual conflicts.

* Look at the diffs from each branch. `git log --merge -p <path>`
will show diffs first for the `HEAD` version and then the
`MERGE_HEAD` version.

* Look at the originals. `git show :1:filename` shows the
common ancestor, `git show :2:filename` shows the `HEAD`
version, and `git show :3:filename` shows the `MERGE_HEAD`
version.


EXAMPLES
--------

@ -406,6 +286,7 @@ linkgit:git-reset[1],
linkgit:git-diff[1], linkgit:git-ls-files[1],
linkgit:git-add[1], linkgit:git-rm[1],
linkgit:git-mergetool[1]
linkgit:gitmergeconflicts[7]

GIT
---