Fixed a formulation mistake in Documentation/user-manual.txt
This one fixes a small formulation weirdness in Documentation/user-manual.txt Signed-off-by: Marcus Fritzsch <m@fritschy.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>maint
parent
46f74f007b
commit
483891810c
|
|
@ -2957,13 +2957,13 @@ developed. If you blow the directory cache away entirely, you generally
|
||||||
haven't lost any information as long as you have the name of the tree
|
haven't lost any information as long as you have the name of the tree
|
||||||
that it described.
|
that it described.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
At the same time, the index is at the same time also the
|
At the same time, the index is also the staging area for creating
|
||||||
staging area for creating new trees, and creating a new tree always
|
new trees, and creating a new tree always involves a controlled
|
||||||
involves a controlled modification of the index file. In particular,
|
modification of the index file. In particular, the index file can
|
||||||
the index file can have the representation of an intermediate tree that
|
have the representation of an intermediate tree that has not yet been
|
||||||
has not yet been instantiated. So the index can be thought of as a
|
instantiated. So the index can be thought of as a write-back cache,
|
||||||
write-back cache, which can contain dirty information that has not yet
|
which can contain dirty information that has not yet been written back
|
||||||
been written back to the backing store.
|
to the backing store.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
||||||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue