@ -189,8 +189,25 @@ static void graph_ensure_capacity(struct git_graph *graph, int num_columns)
@@ -189,8 +189,25 @@ static void graph_ensure_capacity(struct git_graph *graph, int num_columns)
* Returns 1 if the commit will be printed in the graph output,
* and 0 otherwise.
*/
static int graph_is_interesting(struct commit *commit)
static int graph_is_interesting(struct git_graph *graph, struct commit *commit)
{
/*
* If revs->boundary is set, commits whose children have
* been shown are always interesting, even if they have the
* UNINTERESTING or TREESAME flags set.
*
* However, ignore the commit if SHOWN is set. If SHOWN is set,
* the commit is interesting, but it has already been printed.
* This can happen because get_revision() doesn't return the
* boundary commits in topological order, even when
* revs->topo_order is set.
*/
if (graph->revs && graph->revs->boundary) {
if ((commit->object.flags & (SHOWN | CHILD_SHOWN)) ==
CHILD_SHOWN)
return 1;
}
/*
* Uninteresting and pruned commits won't be printed
*/
@ -206,7 +223,7 @@ static void graph_insert_into_new_columns(struct git_graph *graph,
@@ -206,7 +223,7 @@ static void graph_insert_into_new_columns(struct git_graph *graph,
/*
* Ignore uinteresting commits
*/
if (!graph_is_interesting(commit))
if (!graph_is_interesting(graph, commit))
return;
/*
@ -380,7 +397,7 @@ void graph_update(struct git_graph *graph, struct commit *commit)
@@ -380,7 +397,7 @@ void graph_update(struct git_graph *graph, struct commit *commit)
*/
graph->num_parents = 0;
for (parent = commit->parents; parent; parent = parent->next) {
if (graph_is_interesting(parent->item))
if (graph_is_interesting(graph, parent->item))
graph->num_parents++;
}
@ -543,6 +560,51 @@ static void graph_output_pre_commit_line(struct git_graph *graph,
@@ -543,6 +560,51 @@ static void graph_output_pre_commit_line(struct git_graph *graph,
graph->state = GRAPH_COMMIT;
}
static void graph_output_commit_char(struct git_graph *graph, struct strbuf *sb)
{
/*
* For boundary commits, print 'o'
* (We should only see boundary commits when revs->boundary is set.)
*/
if (graph->commit->object.flags & BOUNDARY) {
assert(graph->revs->boundary);
strbuf_addch(sb, 'o');
return;
}
/*
* If revs->left_right is set, print '<' for commits that
* come from the left side, and '>' for commits from the right
* side.
*/
if (graph->revs && graph->revs->left_right) {
if (graph->commit->object.flags & SYMMETRIC_LEFT)
strbuf_addch(sb, '<');
else
strbuf_addch(sb, '>');
return;
}
/*
* Print 'M' for merge commits
*
* Note that we don't check graph->num_parents to determine if the
* commit is a merge, since that only tracks the number of
* "interesting" parents. We want to print 'M' for merge commits
* even if they have less than 2 interesting parents.
*/
if (graph->commit->parents != NULL &&
graph->commit->parents->next != NULL) {
strbuf_addch(sb, 'M');
return;
}
/*
* Print '*' in all other cases
*/
strbuf_addch(sb, '*');
}
void graph_output_commit_line(struct git_graph *graph, struct strbuf *sb)
{
int seen_this = 0;
@ -568,16 +630,7 @@ void graph_output_commit_line(struct git_graph *graph, struct strbuf *sb)
@@ -568,16 +630,7 @@ void graph_output_commit_line(struct git_graph *graph, struct strbuf *sb)
if (col_commit == graph->commit) {
seen_this = 1;
if (graph->revs && graph->revs->left_right) {
if (graph->commit->object.flags & SYMMETRIC_LEFT)
strbuf_addch(sb, '<');
else
strbuf_addch(sb, '>');
} else if (graph->num_parents > 1)
strbuf_addch(sb, 'M');
else
strbuf_addch(sb, '*');
graph_output_commit_char(graph, sb);
if (graph->num_parents < 2)
strbuf_addch(sb, ' ');