test-lib: user-friendly alternatives to test [-d|-f|-e]
The helper functions are implemented, documented, and used in a few
places to validate them, but not everywhere to avoid useless code churn.
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Moy <Matthieu.Moy@imag.fr>
Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
maint
Matthieu Moy14 years agocommitted byJunio C Hamano
@ -79,18 +79,18 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase -i with the exec command' '
@@ -79,18 +79,18 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase -i with the exec command' '
export FAKE_LINES &&
test_must_fail git rebase -i A
) &&
test -f touch-one &&
test -f touch-two &&
! test -f touch-three &&
test_path_is_file touch-one &&
test_path_is_file touch-two &&
test_path_is_missing touch-three " (should have stopped before)" &&
test $(git rev-parse C) = $(git rev-parse HEAD) || {
echo "Stopped at wrong revision:"
echo "($(git describe --tags HEAD) instead of C)"
false
} &&
git rebase --continue &&
test -f touch-three &&
test -f "touch-file name with spaces" &&
test -f touch-after-semicolon &&
test_path_is_file touch-three &&
test_path_is_file "touch-file name with spaces" &&
test_path_is_file touch-after-semicolon &&
test $(git rev-parse master) = $(git rev-parse HEAD) || {
echo "Stopped at wrong revision:"
echo "($(git describe --tags HEAD) instead of master)"
@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase -i with the exec command runs from tree root' '
@@ -105,7 +105,7 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase -i with the exec command runs from tree root' '
test $(git rev-parse new-branch1) = $(git rev-parse HEAD) &&
test "$(git symbolic-ref -q HEAD)" = "refs/heads/branch1" &&
! test -d .git/rebase-merge
test_path_is_missing .git/rebase-merge
'
test_expect_success 'abort with error when new base cannot be checked out' '
@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ test_expect_success 'abort with error when new base cannot be checked out' '
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ test_expect_success 'abort with error when new base cannot be checked out' '
test_must_fail git rebase -i master > output 2>&1 &&
grep "Untracked working tree file .file1. would be overwritten" \