|
|
|
@ -28,19 +28,21 @@ Documentation
@@ -28,19 +28,21 @@ Documentation
|
|
|
|
|
support for this. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Review the existing docs and see if the repository |
|
|
|
|
organization needs to be clarified further [NEXT]. |
|
|
|
|
organization needs to be clarified further [STILL NEEDSWORK]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Update tutorial to cover shared repository style a bit more, |
|
|
|
|
maybe with a toy project that involves two or three |
|
|
|
|
* Update tutorial to cover shared repository style a bit more |
|
|
|
|
[DONE], maybe with a toy project that involves two or three |
|
|
|
|
repositories. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Update tutorial to cover setting up repository hooks to do |
|
|
|
|
common tasks. [IN PROGRESS] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Get help to properly use asciidoc in tutorial. |
|
|
|
|
* Get help to properly use asciidoc in tutorial [Heck, ended up |
|
|
|
|
learning it myself, DONE]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Maybe justify and demonstrate an Octopus in the tutorial. Add |
|
|
|
|
it to the glossary. |
|
|
|
|
* Maybe justify and demonstrate an Octopus in the tutorial |
|
|
|
|
[STILL NEEDSWORK]. Add it to the glossary [Thanks Johannes, |
|
|
|
|
DONE]. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technical (heavier) |
|
|
|
@ -49,8 +51,8 @@ Technical (heavier)
@@ -49,8 +51,8 @@ Technical (heavier)
|
|
|
|
|
* Tony Luck reported an unfortunate glitch in the 3-way merge. |
|
|
|
|
Encourage discussions to come up with a not-so-expensive way |
|
|
|
|
to catch the kind of ambiguities that led to his misery. |
|
|
|
|
[Underway. Thanks Daniel and Fredrik for taking an |
|
|
|
|
initiative.] |
|
|
|
|
[Daniel's patch look promising, just by judging from how clean |
|
|
|
|
the re-organization part of read-tree looks like.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* We might want to optimize cloning with GIT native transport |
|
|
|
|
not to explode the pack, and store it in objects/pack instead. |
|
|
|
@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ Technical (heavier)
@@ -60,7 +62,7 @@ Technical (heavier)
|
|
|
|
|
different from each other. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Maybe a pack optimizer. I am not convinced that packing all |
|
|
|
|
objects into a single pack and removing all the existing pack |
|
|
|
|
objects into a single pack and removing all the existing panck |
|
|
|
|
is the right way to go, since that would work against people |
|
|
|
|
who already have those packs. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -95,7 +97,8 @@ Technical (milder)
@@ -95,7 +97,8 @@ Technical (milder)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~ejr/gits/git.git#portable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Applied. Burned by one of them and backed out.] |
|
|
|
|
[Applied. Burned by one of them and backed out, but otherwise |
|
|
|
|
looks OK.] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Accept patches to cause "read-tree -u" delete a directory when |
|
|
|
|
it makes it empty. |
|
|
|
|