Browse Source
On Wed, 8 Apr 2009, Björn Steinbrink wrote: > > The name of the processed object was duplicated for passing it to > add_object(), but that already calls path_name, which allocates a new > string anyway. So the memory allocated by the xstrdup calls just went > nowhere, leaking memory. Ack, ack. There's another easy 5% or so for the built-in object walker: once we've created the hash from the name, the name isn't interesting any more, and so something trivial like this can help a bit. Does it matter? Probably not on its own. But a few more memory saving tricks and it might all make a difference. Linus Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>maint
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8656/a86569103aa29db44a783f016e2b8703656c4d27" alt="torvalds@linux-foundation.org"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a8656/a86569103aa29db44a783f016e2b8703656c4d27" alt="Junio C Hamano"
1 changed files with 2 additions and 0 deletions
Loading…
Reference in new issue