xdiff: disable cleanup_records heuristic with --minimal
The cleanup_records function marks some lines as changed before running the actual diff algorithm. For most lines, this is a good performance optimization, but it also marks lines that are surrounded by many changed lines as changed as well. This can cause redundant changes and longer-than-necessary diffs. Whether this results in better-looking diffs is subjective. However, the --minimal flag explicitly requests the shortest possible diff. The change results in shorter diffs in about 1.3% of all diffs in Git's history. Performance wise, I have measured the impact on "git log -p -3000 --minimal > /dev/null". With this change, I get Time (mean ± σ): 2.363 s ± 0.023 s (25 runs) and without this patch I measured Time (mean ± σ): 2.362 s ± 0.035 s (25 runs). As the difference is well within the margin of error, this does not seem to have an impact on performance. Signed-off-by: Niels Glodny <n.glodny@campus.lmu.de> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>seen
parent
f65182a99e
commit
03f2915541
|
@ -501,6 +501,7 @@ integration_tests = [
|
|||
't4068-diff-symmetric-merge-base.sh',
|
||||
't4069-remerge-diff.sh',
|
||||
't4070-diff-pairs.sh',
|
||||
't4071-diff-minimal.sh',
|
||||
't4100-apply-stat.sh',
|
||||
't4101-apply-nonl.sh',
|
||||
't4102-apply-rename.sh',
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,14 @@
|
|||
#!/bin/sh
|
||||
|
||||
test_description='minimal diff algorithm'
|
||||
|
||||
. ./test-lib.sh
|
||||
|
||||
test_expect_success 'minimal diff should not mark changes between changed lines' '
|
||||
test_write_lines x x x x >pre &&
|
||||
test_write_lines x x x A B C D x E F G >post &&
|
||||
test_expect_code 1 git diff --no-index --minimal pre post >diff &&
|
||||
test_grep ! ^[+-]x diff
|
||||
'
|
||||
|
||||
test_done
|
|
@ -368,6 +368,7 @@ static int xdl_cleanup_records(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xd
|
|||
xrecord_t **recs;
|
||||
xdlclass_t *rcrec;
|
||||
char *dis, *dis1, *dis2;
|
||||
int need_min = !!(cf->flags & XDF_NEED_MINIMAL);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!XDL_CALLOC_ARRAY(dis, xdf1->nrec + xdf2->nrec + 2))
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
|
@ -379,7 +380,7 @@ static int xdl_cleanup_records(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xd
|
|||
for (i = xdf1->dstart, recs = &xdf1->recs[xdf1->dstart]; i <= xdf1->dend; i++, recs++) {
|
||||
rcrec = cf->rcrecs[(*recs)->ha];
|
||||
nm = rcrec ? rcrec->len2 : 0;
|
||||
dis1[i] = (nm == 0) ? 0: (nm >= mlim) ? 2: 1;
|
||||
dis1[i] = (nm == 0) ? 0: (nm >= mlim && !need_min) ? 2: 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((mlim = xdl_bogosqrt(xdf2->nrec)) > XDL_MAX_EQLIMIT)
|
||||
|
@ -387,7 +388,7 @@ static int xdl_cleanup_records(xdlclassifier_t *cf, xdfile_t *xdf1, xdfile_t *xd
|
|||
for (i = xdf2->dstart, recs = &xdf2->recs[xdf2->dstart]; i <= xdf2->dend; i++, recs++) {
|
||||
rcrec = cf->rcrecs[(*recs)->ha];
|
||||
nm = rcrec ? rcrec->len1 : 0;
|
||||
dis2[i] = (nm == 0) ? 0: (nm >= mlim) ? 2: 1;
|
||||
dis2[i] = (nm == 0) ? 0: (nm >= mlim && !need_min) ? 2: 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
for (nreff = 0, i = xdf1->dstart, recs = &xdf1->recs[xdf1->dstart];
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue