You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

967 lines
21 KiB

/*
* Another stupid program, this one parsing the headers of an
* email to figure out authorship and subject
*/
#include "cache.h"
#include "builtin.h"
#include "utf8.h"
#include "strbuf.h"
static FILE *cmitmsg, *patchfile, *fin, *fout;
static int keep_subject;
static const char *metainfo_charset;
static struct strbuf line = STRBUF_INIT;
static struct strbuf name = STRBUF_INIT;
static struct strbuf email = STRBUF_INIT;
static enum {
TE_DONTCARE, TE_QP, TE_BASE64,
} transfer_encoding;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
static enum {
TYPE_TEXT, TYPE_OTHER,
} message_type;
static struct strbuf charset = STRBUF_INIT;
static int patch_lines;
static struct strbuf **p_hdr_data, **s_hdr_data;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
#define MAX_HDR_PARSED 10
#define MAX_BOUNDARIES 5
static void cleanup_space(struct strbuf *sb);
static void get_sane_name(struct strbuf *out, struct strbuf *name, struct strbuf *email)
{
struct strbuf *src = name;
if (name->len < 3 || 60 < name->len || strchr(name->buf, '@') ||
strchr(name->buf, '<') || strchr(name->buf, '>'))
src = email;
else if (name == out)
return;
strbuf_reset(out);
strbuf_addbuf(out, src);
}
static void parse_bogus_from(const struct strbuf *line)
{
/* John Doe <johndoe> */
char *bra, *ket;
/* This is fallback, so do not bother if we already have an
* e-mail address.
*/
if (email.len)
return;
bra = strchr(line->buf, '<');
if (!bra)
return;
ket = strchr(bra, '>');
if (!ket)
return;
strbuf_reset(&email);
strbuf_add(&email, bra + 1, ket - bra - 1);
strbuf_reset(&name);
strbuf_add(&name, line->buf, bra - line->buf);
strbuf_trim(&name);
get_sane_name(&name, &name, &email);
}
static void handle_from(const struct strbuf *from)
{
char *at;
size_t el;
struct strbuf f;
strbuf_init(&f, from->len);
strbuf_addbuf(&f, from);
at = strchr(f.buf, '@');
if (!at) {
parse_bogus_from(from);
return;
}
/*
* If we already have one email, don't take any confusing lines
*/
if (email.len && strchr(at + 1, '@')) {
strbuf_release(&f);
return;
}
/* Pick up the string around '@', possibly delimited with <>
* pair; that is the email part.
*/
while (at > f.buf) {
char c = at[-1];
if (isspace(c))
break;
if (c == '<') {
at[-1] = ' ';
break;
}
at--;
}
el = strcspn(at, " \n\t\r\v\f>");
strbuf_reset(&email);
strbuf_add(&email, at, el);
strbuf_remove(&f, at - f.buf, el + (at[el] ? 1 : 0));
/* The remainder is name. It could be
*
* - "John Doe <john.doe@xz>" (a), or
* - "john.doe@xz (John Doe)" (b), or
* - "John (zzz) Doe <john.doe@xz> (Comment)" (c)
*
* but we have removed the email part, so
*
* - remove extra spaces which could stay after email (case 'c'), and
* - trim from both ends, possibly removing the () pair at the end
* (cases 'a' and 'b').
*/
cleanup_space(&f);
strbuf_trim(&f);
if (f.buf[0] == '(' && f.len && f.buf[f.len - 1] == ')') {
strbuf_remove(&f, 0, 1);
strbuf_setlen(&f, f.len - 1);
}
get_sane_name(&name, &f, &email);
strbuf_release(&f);
}
static void handle_header(struct strbuf **out, const struct strbuf *line)
{
if (!*out) {
*out = xmalloc(sizeof(struct strbuf));
strbuf_init(*out, line->len);
} else
strbuf_reset(*out);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
strbuf_addbuf(*out, line);
}
/* NOTE NOTE NOTE. We do not claim we do full MIME. We just attempt
* to have enough heuristics to grok MIME encoded patches often found
* on our mailing lists. For example, we do not even treat header lines
* case insensitively.
*/
static int slurp_attr(const char *line, const char *name, struct strbuf *attr)
{
const char *ends, *ap = strcasestr(line, name);
size_t sz;
if (!ap) {
strbuf_setlen(attr, 0);
return 0;
}
ap += strlen(name);
if (*ap == '"') {
ap++;
ends = "\"";
}
else
ends = "; \t";
sz = strcspn(ap, ends);
strbuf_add(attr, ap, sz);
return 1;
}
static struct strbuf *content[MAX_BOUNDARIES];
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
static struct strbuf **content_top = content;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
static void handle_content_type(struct strbuf *line)
{
struct strbuf *boundary = xmalloc(sizeof(struct strbuf));
strbuf_init(boundary, line->len);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
if (!strcasestr(line->buf, "text/"))
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
message_type = TYPE_OTHER;
if (slurp_attr(line->buf, "boundary=", boundary)) {
strbuf_insert(boundary, 0, "--", 2);
if (++content_top > &content[MAX_BOUNDARIES]) {
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
fprintf(stderr, "Too many boundaries to handle\n");
exit(1);
}
*content_top = boundary;
boundary = NULL;
}
slurp_attr(line->buf, "charset=", &charset);
if (boundary) {
strbuf_release(boundary);
free(boundary);
}
}
static void handle_content_transfer_encoding(const struct strbuf *line)
{
if (strcasestr(line->buf, "base64"))
transfer_encoding = TE_BASE64;
else if (strcasestr(line->buf, "quoted-printable"))
transfer_encoding = TE_QP;
else
transfer_encoding = TE_DONTCARE;
}
static int is_multipart_boundary(const struct strbuf *line)
{
return (((*content_top)->len <= line->len) &&
!memcmp(line->buf, (*content_top)->buf, (*content_top)->len));
}
static void cleanup_subject(struct strbuf *subject)
{
char *pos;
size_t remove;
while (subject->len) {
switch (*subject->buf) {
case 'r': case 'R':
if (subject->len <= 3)
break;
if (!memcmp(subject->buf + 1, "e:", 2)) {
strbuf_remove(subject, 0, 3);
continue;
}
break;
case ' ': case '\t': case ':':
strbuf_remove(subject, 0, 1);
continue;
case '[':
if ((pos = strchr(subject->buf, ']'))) {
remove = pos - subject->buf;
if (remove <= (subject->len - remove) * 2) {
strbuf_remove(subject, 0, remove + 1);
continue;
}
} else
strbuf_remove(subject, 0, 1);
break;
}
strbuf_trim(subject);
return;
}
}
static void cleanup_space(struct strbuf *sb)
{
size_t pos, cnt;
for (pos = 0; pos < sb->len; pos++) {
if (isspace(sb->buf[pos])) {
sb->buf[pos] = ' ';
for (cnt = 0; isspace(sb->buf[pos + cnt + 1]); cnt++);
strbuf_remove(sb, pos + 1, cnt);
}
}
}
static void decode_header(struct strbuf *line);
static const char *header[MAX_HDR_PARSED] = {
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
"From","Subject","Date",
};
static inline int cmp_header(const struct strbuf *line, const char *hdr)
{
int len = strlen(hdr);
return !strncasecmp(line->buf, hdr, len) && line->len > len &&
line->buf[len] == ':' && isspace(line->buf[len + 1]);
}
static int check_header(const struct strbuf *line,
struct strbuf *hdr_data[], int overwrite)
{
int i, ret = 0, len;
struct strbuf sb = STRBUF_INIT;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* search for the interesting parts */
for (i = 0; header[i]; i++) {
int len = strlen(header[i]);
if ((!hdr_data[i] || overwrite) && cmp_header(line, header[i])) {
/* Unwrap inline B and Q encoding, and optionally
* normalize the meta information to utf8.
*/
strbuf_add(&sb, line->buf + len + 2, line->len - len - 2);
decode_header(&sb);
handle_header(&hdr_data[i], &sb);
ret = 1;
goto check_header_out;
}
}
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* Content stuff */
if (cmp_header(line, "Content-Type")) {
len = strlen("Content-Type: ");
strbuf_add(&sb, line->buf + len, line->len - len);
decode_header(&sb);
strbuf_insert(&sb, 0, "Content-Type: ", len);
handle_content_type(&sb);
ret = 1;
goto check_header_out;
}
if (cmp_header(line, "Content-Transfer-Encoding")) {
len = strlen("Content-Transfer-Encoding: ");
strbuf_add(&sb, line->buf + len, line->len - len);
decode_header(&sb);
handle_content_transfer_encoding(&sb);
ret = 1;
goto check_header_out;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
}
/* for inbody stuff */
if (!prefixcmp(line->buf, ">From") && isspace(line->buf[5])) {
ret = 1; /* Should this return 0? */
goto check_header_out;
}
if (!prefixcmp(line->buf, "[PATCH]") && isspace(line->buf[7])) {
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
for (i = 0; header[i]; i++) {
if (!memcmp("Subject", header[i], 7)) {
handle_header(&hdr_data[i], line);
ret = 1;
goto check_header_out;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
}
}
}
check_header_out:
strbuf_release(&sb);
return ret;
}
static int is_rfc2822_header(const struct strbuf *line)
{
/*
* The section that defines the loosest possible
* field name is "3.6.8 Optional fields".
*
* optional-field = field-name ":" unstructured CRLF
* field-name = 1*ftext
* ftext = %d33-57 / %59-126
*/
int ch;
char *cp = line->buf;
/* Count mbox From headers as headers */
if (!prefixcmp(cp, "From ") || !prefixcmp(cp, ">From "))
return 1;
while ((ch = *cp++)) {
if (ch == ':')
return 1;
if ((33 <= ch && ch <= 57) ||
(59 <= ch && ch <= 126))
continue;
break;
}
return 0;
}
static int read_one_header_line(struct strbuf *line, FILE *in)
{
/* Get the first part of the line. */
if (strbuf_getline(line, in, '\n'))
return 0;
/*
* Is it an empty line or not a valid rfc2822 header?
* If so, stop here, and return false ("not a header")
*/
strbuf_rtrim(line);
if (!line->len || !is_rfc2822_header(line)) {
/* Re-add the newline */
strbuf_addch(line, '\n');
return 0;
}
/*
* Now we need to eat all the continuation lines..
* Yuck, 2822 header "folding"
*/
for (;;) {
int peek;
struct strbuf continuation = STRBUF_INIT;
peek = fgetc(in); ungetc(peek, in);
if (peek != ' ' && peek != '\t')
break;
if (strbuf_getline(&continuation, in, '\n'))
break;
continuation.buf[0] = '\n';
strbuf_rtrim(&continuation);
strbuf_addbuf(line, &continuation);
}
return 1;
}
static struct strbuf *decode_q_segment(const struct strbuf *q_seg, int rfc2047)
{
const char *in = q_seg->buf;
int c;
struct strbuf *out = xmalloc(sizeof(struct strbuf));
strbuf_init(out, q_seg->len);
while ((c = *in++) != 0) {
if (c == '=') {
int d = *in++;
if (d == '\n' || !d)
break; /* drop trailing newline */
strbuf_addch(out, (hexval(d) << 4) | hexval(*in++));
continue;
}
if (rfc2047 && c == '_') /* rfc2047 4.2 (2) */
c = 0x20;
strbuf_addch(out, c);
}
return out;
}
static struct strbuf *decode_b_segment(const struct strbuf *b_seg)
{
/* Decode in..ep, possibly in-place to ot */
int c, pos = 0, acc = 0;
const char *in = b_seg->buf;
struct strbuf *out = xmalloc(sizeof(struct strbuf));
strbuf_init(out, b_seg->len);
while ((c = *in++) != 0) {
if (c == '+')
c = 62;
else if (c == '/')
c = 63;
else if ('A' <= c && c <= 'Z')
c -= 'A';
else if ('a' <= c && c <= 'z')
c -= 'a' - 26;
else if ('0' <= c && c <= '9')
c -= '0' - 52;
else
continue; /* garbage */
switch (pos++) {
case 0:
acc = (c << 2);
break;
case 1:
strbuf_addch(out, (acc | (c >> 4)));
acc = (c & 15) << 4;
break;
case 2:
strbuf_addch(out, (acc | (c >> 2)));
acc = (c & 3) << 6;
break;
case 3:
strbuf_addch(out, (acc | c));
acc = pos = 0;
break;
}
}
return out;
}
Do a better job at guessing unknown character sets At least in the kernel development community, we're generally slowly converting to UTF-8 everywhere, and the old default of Latin1 in emails is being supplanted by UTF-8, and it doesn't necessarily show up as such in the mail headers (because, quite frankly, when people send patches around, they want the email client to do as little as humanly possible about the patch) Despite that, it's often the case that email addresses etc still have Latin1, so I've seen emails where this is a mixed bag, with Signed-off parts being copied from email (and containing Latin1 characters), and the rest of the email being a patch in UTF-8. So this suggests a very natural change: if the target character set is utf-8 (the default), and if the source already looks like utf-8, just assume that it doesn't need any conversion at all. Only assume that it needs conversion if it isn't already valid utf-8, in which case we (for historical reasons) will assume it's Latin1. Basically no really _valid_ latin1 will ever look like utf-8, so while this changes our historical behaviour, it doesn't do so in practice, and makes the default behaviour saner for the case where the input was already in proper format. We could do a more fancy guess, of course, but this correctly handled a series of patches I just got from Andrew that had a mixture of Latin1 and UTF-8 (in different emails, but without any character set indication). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
18 years ago
/*
* When there is no known charset, guess.
*
* Right now we assume that if the target is UTF-8 (the default),
* and it already looks like UTF-8 (which includes US-ASCII as its
* subset, of course) then that is what it is and there is nothing
* to do.
*
* Otherwise, we default to assuming it is Latin1 for historical
* reasons.
*/
static const char *guess_charset(const struct strbuf *line, const char *target_charset)
Do a better job at guessing unknown character sets At least in the kernel development community, we're generally slowly converting to UTF-8 everywhere, and the old default of Latin1 in emails is being supplanted by UTF-8, and it doesn't necessarily show up as such in the mail headers (because, quite frankly, when people send patches around, they want the email client to do as little as humanly possible about the patch) Despite that, it's often the case that email addresses etc still have Latin1, so I've seen emails where this is a mixed bag, with Signed-off parts being copied from email (and containing Latin1 characters), and the rest of the email being a patch in UTF-8. So this suggests a very natural change: if the target character set is utf-8 (the default), and if the source already looks like utf-8, just assume that it doesn't need any conversion at all. Only assume that it needs conversion if it isn't already valid utf-8, in which case we (for historical reasons) will assume it's Latin1. Basically no really _valid_ latin1 will ever look like utf-8, so while this changes our historical behaviour, it doesn't do so in practice, and makes the default behaviour saner for the case where the input was already in proper format. We could do a more fancy guess, of course, but this correctly handled a series of patches I just got from Andrew that had a mixture of Latin1 and UTF-8 (in different emails, but without any character set indication). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
18 years ago
{
if (is_encoding_utf8(target_charset)) {
if (is_utf8(line->buf))
Do a better job at guessing unknown character sets At least in the kernel development community, we're generally slowly converting to UTF-8 everywhere, and the old default of Latin1 in emails is being supplanted by UTF-8, and it doesn't necessarily show up as such in the mail headers (because, quite frankly, when people send patches around, they want the email client to do as little as humanly possible about the patch) Despite that, it's often the case that email addresses etc still have Latin1, so I've seen emails where this is a mixed bag, with Signed-off parts being copied from email (and containing Latin1 characters), and the rest of the email being a patch in UTF-8. So this suggests a very natural change: if the target character set is utf-8 (the default), and if the source already looks like utf-8, just assume that it doesn't need any conversion at all. Only assume that it needs conversion if it isn't already valid utf-8, in which case we (for historical reasons) will assume it's Latin1. Basically no really _valid_ latin1 will ever look like utf-8, so while this changes our historical behaviour, it doesn't do so in practice, and makes the default behaviour saner for the case where the input was already in proper format. We could do a more fancy guess, of course, but this correctly handled a series of patches I just got from Andrew that had a mixture of Latin1 and UTF-8 (in different emails, but without any character set indication). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
18 years ago
return NULL;
}
return "ISO8859-1";
Do a better job at guessing unknown character sets At least in the kernel development community, we're generally slowly converting to UTF-8 everywhere, and the old default of Latin1 in emails is being supplanted by UTF-8, and it doesn't necessarily show up as such in the mail headers (because, quite frankly, when people send patches around, they want the email client to do as little as humanly possible about the patch) Despite that, it's often the case that email addresses etc still have Latin1, so I've seen emails where this is a mixed bag, with Signed-off parts being copied from email (and containing Latin1 characters), and the rest of the email being a patch in UTF-8. So this suggests a very natural change: if the target character set is utf-8 (the default), and if the source already looks like utf-8, just assume that it doesn't need any conversion at all. Only assume that it needs conversion if it isn't already valid utf-8, in which case we (for historical reasons) will assume it's Latin1. Basically no really _valid_ latin1 will ever look like utf-8, so while this changes our historical behaviour, it doesn't do so in practice, and makes the default behaviour saner for the case where the input was already in proper format. We could do a more fancy guess, of course, but this correctly handled a series of patches I just got from Andrew that had a mixture of Latin1 and UTF-8 (in different emails, but without any character set indication). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
18 years ago
}
static void convert_to_utf8(struct strbuf *line, const char *charset)
{
Do a better job at guessing unknown character sets At least in the kernel development community, we're generally slowly converting to UTF-8 everywhere, and the old default of Latin1 in emails is being supplanted by UTF-8, and it doesn't necessarily show up as such in the mail headers (because, quite frankly, when people send patches around, they want the email client to do as little as humanly possible about the patch) Despite that, it's often the case that email addresses etc still have Latin1, so I've seen emails where this is a mixed bag, with Signed-off parts being copied from email (and containing Latin1 characters), and the rest of the email being a patch in UTF-8. So this suggests a very natural change: if the target character set is utf-8 (the default), and if the source already looks like utf-8, just assume that it doesn't need any conversion at all. Only assume that it needs conversion if it isn't already valid utf-8, in which case we (for historical reasons) will assume it's Latin1. Basically no really _valid_ latin1 will ever look like utf-8, so while this changes our historical behaviour, it doesn't do so in practice, and makes the default behaviour saner for the case where the input was already in proper format. We could do a more fancy guess, of course, but this correctly handled a series of patches I just got from Andrew that had a mixture of Latin1 and UTF-8 (in different emails, but without any character set indication). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
18 years ago
char *out;
if (!charset || !*charset) {
charset = guess_charset(line, metainfo_charset);
if (!charset)
return;
}
if (!strcasecmp(metainfo_charset, charset))
return;
out = reencode_string(line->buf, metainfo_charset, charset);
if (!out)
die("cannot convert from %s to %s",
Do a better job at guessing unknown character sets At least in the kernel development community, we're generally slowly converting to UTF-8 everywhere, and the old default of Latin1 in emails is being supplanted by UTF-8, and it doesn't necessarily show up as such in the mail headers (because, quite frankly, when people send patches around, they want the email client to do as little as humanly possible about the patch) Despite that, it's often the case that email addresses etc still have Latin1, so I've seen emails where this is a mixed bag, with Signed-off parts being copied from email (and containing Latin1 characters), and the rest of the email being a patch in UTF-8. So this suggests a very natural change: if the target character set is utf-8 (the default), and if the source already looks like utf-8, just assume that it doesn't need any conversion at all. Only assume that it needs conversion if it isn't already valid utf-8, in which case we (for historical reasons) will assume it's Latin1. Basically no really _valid_ latin1 will ever look like utf-8, so while this changes our historical behaviour, it doesn't do so in practice, and makes the default behaviour saner for the case where the input was already in proper format. We could do a more fancy guess, of course, but this correctly handled a series of patches I just got from Andrew that had a mixture of Latin1 and UTF-8 (in different emails, but without any character set indication). Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
18 years ago
charset, metainfo_charset);
strbuf_attach(line, out, strlen(out), strlen(out));
}
static int decode_header_bq(struct strbuf *it)
{
char *in, *ep, *cp;
struct strbuf outbuf = STRBUF_INIT, *dec;
struct strbuf charset_q = STRBUF_INIT, piecebuf = STRBUF_INIT;
int rfc2047 = 0;
in = it->buf;
while (in - it->buf <= it->len && (ep = strstr(in, "=?")) != NULL) {
int encoding;
strbuf_reset(&charset_q);
strbuf_reset(&piecebuf);
rfc2047 = 1;
if (in != ep) {
/*
* We are about to process an encoded-word
* that begins at ep, but there is something
* before the encoded word.
*/
char *scan;
for (scan = in; scan < ep; scan++)
if (!isspace(*scan))
break;
if (scan != ep || in == it->buf) {
/*
* We should not lose that "something",
* unless we have just processed an
* encoded-word, and there is only LWS
* before the one we are about to process.
*/
strbuf_add(&outbuf, in, ep - in);
}
}
/* E.g.
* ep : "=?iso-2022-jp?B?GyR...?= foo"
* ep : "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Foo=FCbar?= baz"
*/
ep += 2;
if (ep - it->buf >= it->len || !(cp = strchr(ep, '?')))
goto decode_header_bq_out;
if (cp + 3 - it->buf > it->len)
goto decode_header_bq_out;
strbuf_add(&charset_q, ep, cp - ep);
encoding = cp[1];
if (!encoding || cp[2] != '?')
goto decode_header_bq_out;
ep = strstr(cp + 3, "?=");
if (!ep)
goto decode_header_bq_out;
strbuf_add(&piecebuf, cp + 3, ep - cp - 3);
switch (tolower(encoding)) {
default:
goto decode_header_bq_out;
case 'b':
dec = decode_b_segment(&piecebuf);
break;
case 'q':
dec = decode_q_segment(&piecebuf, 1);
break;
}
if (metainfo_charset)
convert_to_utf8(dec, charset_q.buf);
strbuf_addbuf(&outbuf, dec);
strbuf_release(dec);
free(dec);
in = ep + 2;
}
strbuf_addstr(&outbuf, in);
strbuf_reset(it);
strbuf_addbuf(it, &outbuf);
decode_header_bq_out:
strbuf_release(&outbuf);
strbuf_release(&charset_q);
strbuf_release(&piecebuf);
return rfc2047;
}
static void decode_header(struct strbuf *it)
{
if (decode_header_bq(it))
return;
/* otherwise "it" is a straight copy of the input.
* This can be binary guck but there is no charset specified.
*/
if (metainfo_charset)
convert_to_utf8(it, "");
}
static void decode_transfer_encoding(struct strbuf *line)
{
struct strbuf *ret;
switch (transfer_encoding) {
case TE_QP:
ret = decode_q_segment(line, 0);
break;
case TE_BASE64:
ret = decode_b_segment(line);
break;
case TE_DONTCARE:
default:
return;
}
strbuf_reset(line);
strbuf_addbuf(line, ret);
strbuf_release(ret);
free(ret);
}
static void handle_filter(struct strbuf *line);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
static int find_boundary(void)
{
while (!strbuf_getline(&line, fin, '\n')) {
if (*content_top && is_multipart_boundary(&line))
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
return 1;
}
return 0;
}
static int handle_boundary(void)
{
struct strbuf newline = STRBUF_INIT;
strbuf_addch(&newline, '\n');
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
again:
if (line.len >= (*content_top)->len + 2 &&
!memcmp(line.buf + (*content_top)->len, "--", 2)) {
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* we hit an end boundary */
/* pop the current boundary off the stack */
strbuf_release(*content_top);
free(*content_top);
*content_top = NULL;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* technically won't happen as is_multipart_boundary()
will fail first. But just in case..
*/
if (--content_top < content) {
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
fprintf(stderr, "Detected mismatched boundaries, "
"can't recover\n");
exit(1);
}
handle_filter(&newline);
strbuf_release(&newline);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* skip to the next boundary */
if (!find_boundary())
return 0;
goto again;
}
/* set some defaults */
transfer_encoding = TE_DONTCARE;
strbuf_reset(&charset);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
message_type = TYPE_TEXT;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* slurp in this section's info */
while (read_one_header_line(&line, fin))
check_header(&line, p_hdr_data, 0);
strbuf_release(&newline);
/* replenish line */
if (strbuf_getline(&line, fin, '\n'))
return 0;
strbuf_addch(&line, '\n');
return 1;
}
static inline int patchbreak(const struct strbuf *line)
{
size_t i;
/* Beginning of a "diff -" header? */
if (!prefixcmp(line->buf, "diff -"))
return 1;
/* CVS "Index: " line? */
if (!prefixcmp(line->buf, "Index: "))
return 1;
/*
* "--- <filename>" starts patches without headers
* "---<sp>*" is a manual separator
*/
if (line->len < 4)
return 0;
if (!prefixcmp(line->buf, "---")) {
/* space followed by a filename? */
if (line->buf[3] == ' ' && !isspace(line->buf[4]))
return 1;
/* Just whitespace? */
for (i = 3; i < line->len; i++) {
unsigned char c = line->buf[i];
if (c == '\n')
return 1;
if (!isspace(c))
break;
}
return 0;
}
return 0;
}
static int handle_commit_msg(struct strbuf *line)
{
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
static int still_looking = 1;
if (!cmitmsg)
return 0;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
if (still_looking) {
strbuf_ltrim(line);
if (!line->len)
return 0;
if ((still_looking = check_header(line, s_hdr_data, 0)) != 0)
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
return 0;
}
/* normalize the log message to UTF-8. */
if (metainfo_charset)
convert_to_utf8(line, charset.buf);
if (patchbreak(line)) {
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
fclose(cmitmsg);
cmitmsg = NULL;
return 1;
}
fputs(line->buf, cmitmsg);
return 0;
}
static void handle_patch(const struct strbuf *line)
{
fwrite(line->buf, 1, line->len, patchfile);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
patch_lines++;
}
static void handle_filter(struct strbuf *line)
{
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
static int filter = 0;
/* filter tells us which part we left off on */
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
switch (filter) {
case 0:
if (!handle_commit_msg(line))
break;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
filter++;
case 1:
handle_patch(line);
break;
}
}
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
static void handle_body(void)
{
int len = 0;
struct strbuf prev = STRBUF_INIT;
/* Skip up to the first boundary */
if (*content_top) {
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
if (!find_boundary())
goto handle_body_out;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
}
do {
strbuf_setlen(&line, line.len + len);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* process any boundary lines */
if (*content_top && is_multipart_boundary(&line)) {
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* flush any leftover */
if (prev.len) {
handle_filter(&prev);
strbuf_reset(&prev);
}
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
if (!handle_boundary())
goto handle_body_out;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
}
/* Unwrap transfer encoding */
decode_transfer_encoding(&line);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
switch (transfer_encoding) {
case TE_BASE64:
case TE_QP:
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
{
struct strbuf **lines, **it, *sb;
/* Prepend any previous partial lines */
strbuf_insert(&line, 0, prev.buf, prev.len);
strbuf_reset(&prev);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* binary data most likely doesn't have newlines */
if (message_type != TYPE_TEXT) {
handle_filter(&line);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
break;
}
/*
* This is a decoded line that may contain
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
* multiple new lines. Pass only one chunk
* at a time to handle_filter()
*/
lines = strbuf_split(&line, '\n');
for (it = lines; (sb = *it); it++) {
if (*(it + 1) == NULL) /* The last line */
if (sb->buf[sb->len - 1] != '\n') {
/* Partial line, save it for later. */
strbuf_addbuf(&prev, sb);
break;
}
handle_filter(sb);
}
/*
* The partial chunk is saved in "prev" and will be
* appended by the next iteration of read_line_with_nul().
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
*/
strbuf_list_free(lines);
break;
}
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
default:
handle_filter(&line);
}
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
strbuf_reset(&line);
if (strbuf_avail(&line) < 100)
strbuf_grow(&line, 100);
} while ((len = read_line_with_nul(line.buf, strbuf_avail(&line), fin)));
handle_body_out:
strbuf_release(&prev);
}
static void output_header_lines(FILE *fout, const char *hdr, const struct strbuf *data)
{
const char *sp = data->buf;
while (1) {
char *ep = strchr(sp, '\n');
int len;
if (!ep)
len = strlen(sp);
else
len = ep - sp;
fprintf(fout, "%s: %.*s\n", hdr, len, sp);
if (!ep)
break;
sp = ep + 1;
}
}
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
static void handle_info(void)
{
struct strbuf *hdr;
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
int i;
for (i = 0; header[i]; i++) {
/* only print inbody headers if we output a patch file */
if (patch_lines && s_hdr_data[i])
hdr = s_hdr_data[i];
else if (p_hdr_data[i])
hdr = p_hdr_data[i];
else
continue;
if (!memcmp(header[i], "Subject", 7)) {
if (!keep_subject) {
cleanup_subject(hdr);
cleanup_space(hdr);
}
output_header_lines(fout, "Subject", hdr);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
} else if (!memcmp(header[i], "From", 4)) {
cleanup_space(hdr);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
handle_from(hdr);
fprintf(fout, "Author: %s\n", name.buf);
fprintf(fout, "Email: %s\n", email.buf);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
} else {
cleanup_space(hdr);
fprintf(fout, "%s: %s\n", header[i], hdr->buf);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
}
}
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
fprintf(fout, "\n");
}
static int mailinfo(FILE *in, FILE *out, int ks, const char *encoding,
const char *msg, const char *patch)
{
int peek;
keep_subject = ks;
metainfo_charset = encoding;
fin = in;
fout = out;
cmitmsg = fopen(msg, "w");
if (!cmitmsg) {
perror(msg);
return -1;
}
patchfile = fopen(patch, "w");
if (!patchfile) {
perror(patch);
fclose(cmitmsg);
return -1;
}
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
p_hdr_data = xcalloc(MAX_HDR_PARSED, sizeof(*p_hdr_data));
s_hdr_data = xcalloc(MAX_HDR_PARSED, sizeof(*s_hdr_data));
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
do {
peek = fgetc(in);
} while (isspace(peek));
ungetc(peek, in);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
/* process the email header */
while (read_one_header_line(&line, fin))
check_header(&line, p_hdr_data, 1);
builtin-mailinfo.c infrastrcture changes I am working on a project that required parsing through regular mboxes that didn't necessarily have patches embedded in them. I started by creating my own modified copy of git-am and working from there. Very quickly, I noticed git-mailinfo wasn't able to handle a big chunk of my email. After hacking up numerous solutions and running into more limitations, I decided it was just easier to rewrite a big chunk of it. The following patch has a bunch of fixes and features that I needed in order for me do what I wanted. Note: I'm didn't follow any email rfc papers but I don't think any of the changes I did required much knowledge (besides the boundary stuff). List of major changes/fixes: - can't create empty patch files fix - empty patch files don't fail, this failure will come inside git-am - multipart boundaries are now handled - only output inbody headers if a patch exists otherwise assume those headers are part of the reply and instead output the original headers - decode and filter base64 patches correctly - various other accidental fixes I believe I didn't break any existing functionality or compatibility (other than what I describe above, which is really only the empty patch file). I tested this through various mailing list archives and everything seemed to parse correctly (a couple thousand emails). [jc: squashed in another patch from Don's five patch series to fix the test case, as this patch exposes the bug in the test.] Signed-off-by: Don Zickus <dzickus@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
18 years ago
handle_body();
handle_info();
return 0;
}
static const char mailinfo_usage[] =
"git mailinfo [-k] [-u | --encoding=<encoding> | -n] msg patch <mail >info";
int cmd_mailinfo(int argc, const char **argv, const char *prefix)
{
const char *def_charset;
/* NEEDSWORK: might want to do the optional .git/ directory
* discovery
*/
git_config(git_default_config, NULL);
def_charset = (git_commit_encoding ? git_commit_encoding : "UTF-8");
metainfo_charset = def_charset;
while (1 < argc && argv[1][0] == '-') {
if (!strcmp(argv[1], "-k"))
keep_subject = 1;
else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "-u"))
metainfo_charset = def_charset;
else if (!strcmp(argv[1], "-n"))
metainfo_charset = NULL;
else if (!prefixcmp(argv[1], "--encoding="))
metainfo_charset = argv[1] + 11;
else
usage(mailinfo_usage);
argc--; argv++;
}
if (argc != 3)
usage(mailinfo_usage);
return !!mailinfo(stdin, stdout, keep_subject, metainfo_charset, argv[1], argv[2]);
}