You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

1200 lines
33 KiB

#include "cache.h"
#include "notes.h"
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
#include "blob.h"
#include "tree.h"
#include "utf8.h"
#include "strbuf.h"
#include "tree-walk.h"
#include "string-list.h"
#include "refs.h"
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
/*
* Use a non-balancing simple 16-tree structure with struct int_node as
* internal nodes, and struct leaf_node as leaf nodes. Each int_node has a
* 16-array of pointers to its children.
* The bottom 2 bits of each pointer is used to identify the pointer type
* - ptr & 3 == 0 - NULL pointer, assert(ptr == NULL)
* - ptr & 3 == 1 - pointer to next internal node - cast to struct int_node *
* - ptr & 3 == 2 - pointer to note entry - cast to struct leaf_node *
* - ptr & 3 == 3 - pointer to subtree entry - cast to struct leaf_node *
*
* The root node is a statically allocated struct int_node.
*/
struct int_node {
void *a[16];
};
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
/*
* Leaf nodes come in two variants, note entries and subtree entries,
* distinguished by the LSb of the leaf node pointer (see above).
* As a note entry, the key is the SHA1 of the referenced object, and the
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
* value is the SHA1 of the note object.
* As a subtree entry, the key is the prefix SHA1 (w/trailing NULs) of the
* referenced object, using the last byte of the key to store the length of
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
* the prefix. The value is the SHA1 of the tree object containing the notes
* subtree.
*/
struct leaf_node {
unsigned char key_sha1[20];
unsigned char val_sha1[20];
};
/*
* A notes tree may contain entries that are not notes, and that do not follow
* the naming conventions of notes. There are typically none/few of these, but
* we still need to keep track of them. Keep a simple linked list sorted alpha-
* betically on the non-note path. The list is populated when parsing tree
* objects in load_subtree(), and the non-notes are correctly written back into
* the tree objects produced by write_notes_tree().
*/
struct non_note {
struct non_note *next; /* grounded (last->next == NULL) */
char *path;
unsigned int mode;
unsigned char sha1[20];
};
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
#define PTR_TYPE_NULL 0
#define PTR_TYPE_INTERNAL 1
#define PTR_TYPE_NOTE 2
#define PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE 3
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
#define GET_PTR_TYPE(ptr) ((uintptr_t) (ptr) & 3)
#define CLR_PTR_TYPE(ptr) ((void *) ((uintptr_t) (ptr) & ~3))
#define SET_PTR_TYPE(ptr, type) ((void *) ((uintptr_t) (ptr) | (type)))
#define GET_NIBBLE(n, sha1) (((sha1[(n) >> 1]) >> ((~(n) & 0x01) << 2)) & 0x0f)
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
#define SUBTREE_SHA1_PREFIXCMP(key_sha1, subtree_sha1) \
(memcmp(key_sha1, subtree_sha1, subtree_sha1[19]))
struct notes_tree default_notes_tree;
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
static struct string_list display_notes_refs;
static struct notes_tree **display_notes_trees;
static void load_subtree(struct notes_tree *t, struct leaf_node *subtree,
struct int_node *node, unsigned int n);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
/*
* Search the tree until the appropriate location for the given key is found:
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
* 1. Start at the root node, with n = 0
* 2. If a[0] at the current level is a matching subtree entry, unpack that
* subtree entry and remove it; restart search at the current level.
* 3. Use the nth nibble of the key as an index into a:
* - If a[n] is an int_node, recurse from #2 into that node and increment n
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
* - If a matching subtree entry, unpack that subtree entry (and remove it);
* restart search at the current level.
* - Otherwise, we have found one of the following:
* - a subtree entry which does not match the key
* - a note entry which may or may not match the key
* - an unused leaf node (NULL)
* In any case, set *tree and *n, and return pointer to the tree location.
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
*/
static void **note_tree_search(struct notes_tree *t, struct int_node **tree,
unsigned char *n, const unsigned char *key_sha1)
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
{
struct leaf_node *l;
unsigned char i;
void *p = (*tree)->a[0];
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
if (GET_PTR_TYPE(p) == PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE) {
l = (struct leaf_node *) CLR_PTR_TYPE(p);
if (!SUBTREE_SHA1_PREFIXCMP(key_sha1, l->key_sha1)) {
/* unpack tree and resume search */
(*tree)->a[0] = NULL;
load_subtree(t, l, *tree, *n);
free(l);
return note_tree_search(t, tree, n, key_sha1);
}
}
i = GET_NIBBLE(*n, key_sha1);
p = (*tree)->a[i];
switch (GET_PTR_TYPE(p)) {
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
case PTR_TYPE_INTERNAL:
*tree = CLR_PTR_TYPE(p);
(*n)++;
return note_tree_search(t, tree, n, key_sha1);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
case PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE:
l = (struct leaf_node *) CLR_PTR_TYPE(p);
if (!SUBTREE_SHA1_PREFIXCMP(key_sha1, l->key_sha1)) {
/* unpack tree and resume search */
(*tree)->a[i] = NULL;
load_subtree(t, l, *tree, *n);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
free(l);
return note_tree_search(t, tree, n, key_sha1);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
}
/* fall through */
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
default:
return &((*tree)->a[i]);
}
}
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
/*
* To find a leaf_node:
* Search to the tree location appropriate for the given key:
* If a note entry with matching key, return the note entry, else return NULL.
*/
static struct leaf_node *note_tree_find(struct notes_tree *t,
struct int_node *tree, unsigned char n,
const unsigned char *key_sha1)
{
void **p = note_tree_search(t, &tree, &n, key_sha1);
if (GET_PTR_TYPE(*p) == PTR_TYPE_NOTE) {
struct leaf_node *l = (struct leaf_node *) CLR_PTR_TYPE(*p);
if (!hashcmp(key_sha1, l->key_sha1))
return l;
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
}
return NULL;
}
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
/*
* To insert a leaf_node:
* Search to the tree location appropriate for the given leaf_node's key:
* - If location is unused (NULL), store the tweaked pointer directly there
* - If location holds a note entry that matches the note-to-be-inserted, then
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
* combine the two notes (by calling the given combine_notes function).
* - If location holds a note entry that matches the subtree-to-be-inserted,
* then unpack the subtree-to-be-inserted into the location.
* - If location holds a matching subtree entry, unpack the subtree at that
* location, and restart the insert operation from that level.
* - Else, create a new int_node, holding both the node-at-location and the
* node-to-be-inserted, and store the new int_node into the location.
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
*/
static void note_tree_insert(struct notes_tree *t, struct int_node *tree,
unsigned char n, struct leaf_node *entry, unsigned char type,
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
combine_notes_fn combine_notes)
{
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
struct int_node *new_node;
struct leaf_node *l;
void **p = note_tree_search(t, &tree, &n, entry->key_sha1);
assert(GET_PTR_TYPE(entry) == 0); /* no type bits set */
l = (struct leaf_node *) CLR_PTR_TYPE(*p);
switch (GET_PTR_TYPE(*p)) {
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
case PTR_TYPE_NULL:
assert(!*p);
*p = SET_PTR_TYPE(entry, type);
return;
case PTR_TYPE_NOTE:
switch (type) {
case PTR_TYPE_NOTE:
if (!hashcmp(l->key_sha1, entry->key_sha1)) {
/* skip concatenation if l == entry */
if (!hashcmp(l->val_sha1, entry->val_sha1))
return;
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
if (combine_notes(l->val_sha1, entry->val_sha1))
die("failed to combine notes %s and %s"
" for object %s",
sha1_to_hex(l->val_sha1),
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
sha1_to_hex(entry->val_sha1),
sha1_to_hex(l->key_sha1));
free(entry);
return;
}
break;
case PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE:
if (!SUBTREE_SHA1_PREFIXCMP(l->key_sha1,
entry->key_sha1)) {
/* unpack 'entry' */
load_subtree(t, entry, tree, n);
free(entry);
return;
}
break;
}
break;
case PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE:
if (!SUBTREE_SHA1_PREFIXCMP(entry->key_sha1, l->key_sha1)) {
/* unpack 'l' and restart insert */
*p = NULL;
load_subtree(t, l, tree, n);
free(l);
note_tree_insert(t, tree, n, entry, type,
combine_notes);
return;
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
}
break;
}
/* non-matching leaf_node */
assert(GET_PTR_TYPE(*p) == PTR_TYPE_NOTE ||
GET_PTR_TYPE(*p) == PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE);
new_node = (struct int_node *) xcalloc(sizeof(struct int_node), 1);
note_tree_insert(t, new_node, n + 1, l, GET_PTR_TYPE(*p),
combine_notes);
*p = SET_PTR_TYPE(new_node, PTR_TYPE_INTERNAL);
note_tree_insert(t, new_node, n + 1, entry, type, combine_notes);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
}
/*
* How to consolidate an int_node:
* If there are > 1 non-NULL entries, give up and return non-zero.
* Otherwise replace the int_node at the given index in the given parent node
* with the only entry (or a NULL entry if no entries) from the given tree,
* and return 0.
*/
static int note_tree_consolidate(struct int_node *tree,
struct int_node *parent, unsigned char index)
{
unsigned int i;
void *p = NULL;
assert(tree && parent);
assert(CLR_PTR_TYPE(parent->a[index]) == tree);
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
if (GET_PTR_TYPE(tree->a[i]) != PTR_TYPE_NULL) {
if (p) /* more than one entry */
return -2;
p = tree->a[i];
}
}
/* replace tree with p in parent[index] */
parent->a[index] = p;
free(tree);
return 0;
}
/*
* To remove a leaf_node:
* Search to the tree location appropriate for the given leaf_node's key:
* - If location does not hold a matching entry, abort and do nothing.
* - Copy the matching entry's value into the given entry.
* - Replace the matching leaf_node with a NULL entry (and free the leaf_node).
* - Consolidate int_nodes repeatedly, while walking up the tree towards root.
*/
static void note_tree_remove(struct notes_tree *t,
struct int_node *tree, unsigned char n,
struct leaf_node *entry)
{
struct leaf_node *l;
struct int_node *parent_stack[20];
unsigned char i, j;
void **p = note_tree_search(t, &tree, &n, entry->key_sha1);
assert(GET_PTR_TYPE(entry) == 0); /* no type bits set */
if (GET_PTR_TYPE(*p) != PTR_TYPE_NOTE)
return; /* type mismatch, nothing to remove */
l = (struct leaf_node *) CLR_PTR_TYPE(*p);
if (hashcmp(l->key_sha1, entry->key_sha1))
return; /* key mismatch, nothing to remove */
/* we have found a matching entry */
hashcpy(entry->val_sha1, l->val_sha1);
free(l);
*p = SET_PTR_TYPE(NULL, PTR_TYPE_NULL);
/* consolidate this tree level, and parent levels, if possible */
if (!n)
return; /* cannot consolidate top level */
/* first, build stack of ancestors between root and current node */
parent_stack[0] = t->root;
for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
j = GET_NIBBLE(i, entry->key_sha1);
parent_stack[i + 1] = CLR_PTR_TYPE(parent_stack[i]->a[j]);
}
assert(i == n && parent_stack[i] == tree);
/* next, unwind stack until note_tree_consolidate() is done */
while (i > 0 &&
!note_tree_consolidate(parent_stack[i], parent_stack[i - 1],
GET_NIBBLE(i - 1, entry->key_sha1)))
i--;
}
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
/* Free the entire notes data contained in the given tree */
static void note_tree_free(struct int_node *tree)
{
unsigned int i;
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
void *p = tree->a[i];
switch (GET_PTR_TYPE(p)) {
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
case PTR_TYPE_INTERNAL:
note_tree_free(CLR_PTR_TYPE(p));
/* fall through */
case PTR_TYPE_NOTE:
case PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE:
free(CLR_PTR_TYPE(p));
}
}
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
}
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
/*
* Convert a partial SHA1 hex string to the corresponding partial SHA1 value.
* - hex - Partial SHA1 segment in ASCII hex format
* - hex_len - Length of above segment. Must be multiple of 2 between 0 and 40
* - sha1 - Partial SHA1 value is written here
* - sha1_len - Max #bytes to store in sha1, Must be >= hex_len / 2, and < 20
* Returns -1 on error (invalid arguments or invalid SHA1 (not in hex format)).
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
* Otherwise, returns number of bytes written to sha1 (i.e. hex_len / 2).
* Pads sha1 with NULs up to sha1_len (not included in returned length).
*/
static int get_sha1_hex_segment(const char *hex, unsigned int hex_len,
unsigned char *sha1, unsigned int sha1_len)
{
unsigned int i, len = hex_len >> 1;
if (hex_len % 2 != 0 || len > sha1_len)
return -1;
for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
unsigned int val = (hexval(hex[0]) << 4) | hexval(hex[1]);
if (val & ~0xff)
return -1;
*sha1++ = val;
hex += 2;
}
for (; i < sha1_len; i++)
*sha1++ = 0;
return len;
}
static int non_note_cmp(const struct non_note *a, const struct non_note *b)
{
return strcmp(a->path, b->path);
}
static void add_non_note(struct notes_tree *t, const char *path,
unsigned int mode, const unsigned char *sha1)
{
struct non_note *p = t->prev_non_note, *n;
n = (struct non_note *) xmalloc(sizeof(struct non_note));
n->next = NULL;
n->path = xstrdup(path);
n->mode = mode;
hashcpy(n->sha1, sha1);
t->prev_non_note = n;
if (!t->first_non_note) {
t->first_non_note = n;
return;
}
if (non_note_cmp(p, n) < 0)
; /* do nothing */
else if (non_note_cmp(t->first_non_note, n) <= 0)
p = t->first_non_note;
else {
/* n sorts before t->first_non_note */
n->next = t->first_non_note;
t->first_non_note = n;
return;
}
/* n sorts equal or after p */
while (p->next && non_note_cmp(p->next, n) <= 0)
p = p->next;
if (non_note_cmp(p, n) == 0) { /* n ~= p; overwrite p with n */
assert(strcmp(p->path, n->path) == 0);
p->mode = n->mode;
hashcpy(p->sha1, n->sha1);
free(n);
t->prev_non_note = p;
return;
}
/* n sorts between p and p->next */
n->next = p->next;
p->next = n;
}
static void load_subtree(struct notes_tree *t, struct leaf_node *subtree,
struct int_node *node, unsigned int n)
{
unsigned char object_sha1[20];
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
unsigned int prefix_len;
void *buf;
struct tree_desc desc;
struct name_entry entry;
int len, path_len;
unsigned char type;
struct leaf_node *l;
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
buf = fill_tree_descriptor(&desc, subtree->val_sha1);
if (!buf)
die("Could not read %s for notes-index",
sha1_to_hex(subtree->val_sha1));
prefix_len = subtree->key_sha1[19];
assert(prefix_len * 2 >= n);
memcpy(object_sha1, subtree->key_sha1, prefix_len);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
while (tree_entry(&desc, &entry)) {
path_len = strlen(entry.path);
len = get_sha1_hex_segment(entry.path, path_len,
object_sha1 + prefix_len, 20 - prefix_len);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
if (len < 0)
goto handle_non_note; /* entry.path is not a SHA1 */
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
len += prefix_len;
/*
* If object SHA1 is complete (len == 20), assume note object
* If object SHA1 is incomplete (len < 20), and current
* component consists of 2 hex chars, assume note subtree
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
*/
if (len <= 20) {
type = PTR_TYPE_NOTE;
l = (struct leaf_node *)
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
xcalloc(sizeof(struct leaf_node), 1);
hashcpy(l->key_sha1, object_sha1);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
hashcpy(l->val_sha1, entry.sha1);
if (len < 20) {
if (!S_ISDIR(entry.mode) || path_len != 2)
goto handle_non_note; /* not subtree */
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
l->key_sha1[19] = (unsigned char) len;
type = PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE;
}
note_tree_insert(t, node, n, l, type,
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
combine_notes_concatenate);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
}
continue;
handle_non_note:
/*
* Determine full path for this non-note entry:
* The filename is already found in entry.path, but the
* directory part of the path must be deduced from the subtree
* containing this entry. We assume here that the overall notes
* tree follows a strict byte-based progressive fanout
* structure (i.e. using 2/38, 2/2/36, etc. fanouts, and not
* e.g. 4/36 fanout). This means that if a non-note is found at
* path "dead/beef", the following code will register it as
* being found on "de/ad/beef".
* On the other hand, if you use such non-obvious non-note
* paths in the middle of a notes tree, you deserve what's
* coming to you ;). Note that for non-notes that are not
* SHA1-like at the top level, there will be no problems.
*
* To conclude, it is strongly advised to make sure non-notes
* have at least one non-hex character in the top-level path
* component.
*/
{
char non_note_path[PATH_MAX];
char *p = non_note_path;
const char *q = sha1_to_hex(subtree->key_sha1);
int i;
for (i = 0; i < prefix_len; i++) {
*p++ = *q++;
*p++ = *q++;
*p++ = '/';
}
strcpy(p, entry.path);
add_non_note(t, non_note_path, entry.mode, entry.sha1);
}
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
}
free(buf);
}
/*
* Determine optimal on-disk fanout for this part of the notes tree
*
* Given a (sub)tree and the level in the internal tree structure, determine
* whether or not the given existing fanout should be expanded for this
* (sub)tree.
*
* Values of the 'fanout' variable:
* - 0: No fanout (all notes are stored directly in the root notes tree)
* - 1: 2/38 fanout
* - 2: 2/2/36 fanout
* - 3: 2/2/2/34 fanout
* etc.
*/
static unsigned char determine_fanout(struct int_node *tree, unsigned char n,
unsigned char fanout)
{
/*
* The following is a simple heuristic that works well in practice:
* For each even-numbered 16-tree level (remember that each on-disk
* fanout level corresponds to _two_ 16-tree levels), peek at all 16
* entries at that tree level. If all of them are either int_nodes or
* subtree entries, then there are likely plenty of notes below this
* level, so we return an incremented fanout.
*/
unsigned int i;
if ((n % 2) || (n > 2 * fanout))
return fanout;
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
switch (GET_PTR_TYPE(tree->a[i])) {
case PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE:
case PTR_TYPE_INTERNAL:
continue;
default:
return fanout;
}
}
return fanout + 1;
}
static void construct_path_with_fanout(const unsigned char *sha1,
unsigned char fanout, char *path)
{
unsigned int i = 0, j = 0;
const char *hex_sha1 = sha1_to_hex(sha1);
assert(fanout < 20);
while (fanout) {
path[i++] = hex_sha1[j++];
path[i++] = hex_sha1[j++];
path[i++] = '/';
fanout--;
}
strcpy(path + i, hex_sha1 + j);
}
static int for_each_note_helper(struct notes_tree *t, struct int_node *tree,
unsigned char n, unsigned char fanout, int flags,
each_note_fn fn, void *cb_data)
{
unsigned int i;
void *p;
int ret = 0;
struct leaf_node *l;
static char path[40 + 19 + 1]; /* hex SHA1 + 19 * '/' + NUL */
fanout = determine_fanout(tree, n, fanout);
for (i = 0; i < 16; i++) {
redo:
p = tree->a[i];
switch (GET_PTR_TYPE(p)) {
case PTR_TYPE_INTERNAL:
/* recurse into int_node */
ret = for_each_note_helper(t, CLR_PTR_TYPE(p), n + 1,
fanout, flags, fn, cb_data);
break;
case PTR_TYPE_SUBTREE:
l = (struct leaf_node *) CLR_PTR_TYPE(p);
/*
* Subtree entries in the note tree represent parts of
* the note tree that have not yet been explored. There
* is a direct relationship between subtree entries at
* level 'n' in the tree, and the 'fanout' variable:
* Subtree entries at level 'n <= 2 * fanout' should be
* preserved, since they correspond exactly to a fanout
* directory in the on-disk structure. However, subtree
* entries at level 'n > 2 * fanout' should NOT be
* preserved, but rather consolidated into the above
* notes tree level. We achieve this by unconditionally
* unpacking subtree entries that exist below the
* threshold level at 'n = 2 * fanout'.
*/
if (n <= 2 * fanout &&
flags & FOR_EACH_NOTE_YIELD_SUBTREES) {
/* invoke callback with subtree */
unsigned int path_len =
l->key_sha1[19] * 2 + fanout;
assert(path_len < 40 + 19);
construct_path_with_fanout(l->key_sha1, fanout,
path);
/* Create trailing slash, if needed */
if (path[path_len - 1] != '/')
path[path_len++] = '/';
path[path_len] = '\0';
ret = fn(l->key_sha1, l->val_sha1, path,
cb_data);
}
if (n > fanout * 2 ||
!(flags & FOR_EACH_NOTE_DONT_UNPACK_SUBTREES)) {
/* unpack subtree and resume traversal */
tree->a[i] = NULL;
load_subtree(t, l, tree, n);
free(l);
goto redo;
}
break;
case PTR_TYPE_NOTE:
l = (struct leaf_node *) CLR_PTR_TYPE(p);
construct_path_with_fanout(l->key_sha1, fanout, path);
ret = fn(l->key_sha1, l->val_sha1, path, cb_data);
break;
}
if (ret)
return ret;
}
return 0;
}
struct tree_write_stack {
struct tree_write_stack *next;
struct strbuf buf;
char path[2]; /* path to subtree in next, if any */
};
static inline int matches_tree_write_stack(struct tree_write_stack *tws,
const char *full_path)
{
return full_path[0] == tws->path[0] &&
full_path[1] == tws->path[1] &&
full_path[2] == '/';
}
static void write_tree_entry(struct strbuf *buf, unsigned int mode,
const char *path, unsigned int path_len, const
unsigned char *sha1)
{
strbuf_addf(buf, "%o %.*s%c", mode, path_len, path, '\0');
strbuf_add(buf, sha1, 20);
}
static void tree_write_stack_init_subtree(struct tree_write_stack *tws,
const char *path)
{
struct tree_write_stack *n;
assert(!tws->next);
assert(tws->path[0] == '\0' && tws->path[1] == '\0');
n = (struct tree_write_stack *)
xmalloc(sizeof(struct tree_write_stack));
n->next = NULL;
strbuf_init(&n->buf, 256 * (32 + 40)); /* assume 256 entries per tree */
n->path[0] = n->path[1] = '\0';
tws->next = n;
tws->path[0] = path[0];
tws->path[1] = path[1];
}
static int tree_write_stack_finish_subtree(struct tree_write_stack *tws)
{
int ret;
struct tree_write_stack *n = tws->next;
unsigned char s[20];
if (n) {
ret = tree_write_stack_finish_subtree(n);
if (ret)
return ret;
ret = write_sha1_file(n->buf.buf, n->buf.len, tree_type, s);
if (ret)
return ret;
strbuf_release(&n->buf);
free(n);
tws->next = NULL;
write_tree_entry(&tws->buf, 040000, tws->path, 2, s);
tws->path[0] = tws->path[1] = '\0';
}
return 0;
}
static int write_each_note_helper(struct tree_write_stack *tws,
const char *path, unsigned int mode,
const unsigned char *sha1)
{
size_t path_len = strlen(path);
unsigned int n = 0;
int ret;
/* Determine common part of tree write stack */
while (tws && 3 * n < path_len &&
matches_tree_write_stack(tws, path + 3 * n)) {
n++;
tws = tws->next;
}
/* tws point to last matching tree_write_stack entry */
ret = tree_write_stack_finish_subtree(tws);
if (ret)
return ret;
/* Start subtrees needed to satisfy path */
while (3 * n + 2 < path_len && path[3 * n + 2] == '/') {
tree_write_stack_init_subtree(tws, path + 3 * n);
n++;
tws = tws->next;
}
/* There should be no more directory components in the given path */
assert(memchr(path + 3 * n, '/', path_len - (3 * n)) == NULL);
/* Finally add given entry to the current tree object */
write_tree_entry(&tws->buf, mode, path + 3 * n, path_len - (3 * n),
sha1);
return 0;
}
struct write_each_note_data {
struct tree_write_stack *root;
struct non_note *next_non_note;
};
static int write_each_non_note_until(const char *note_path,
struct write_each_note_data *d)
{
struct non_note *n = d->next_non_note;
int cmp = 0, ret;
while (n && (!note_path || (cmp = strcmp(n->path, note_path)) <= 0)) {
if (note_path && cmp == 0)
; /* do nothing, prefer note to non-note */
else {
ret = write_each_note_helper(d->root, n->path, n->mode,
n->sha1);
if (ret)
return ret;
}
n = n->next;
}
d->next_non_note = n;
return 0;
}
static int write_each_note(const unsigned char *object_sha1,
const unsigned char *note_sha1, char *note_path,
void *cb_data)
{
struct write_each_note_data *d =
(struct write_each_note_data *) cb_data;
size_t note_path_len = strlen(note_path);
unsigned int mode = 0100644;
if (note_path[note_path_len - 1] == '/') {
/* subtree entry */
note_path_len--;
note_path[note_path_len] = '\0';
mode = 040000;
}
assert(note_path_len <= 40 + 19);
/* Weave non-note entries into note entries */
return write_each_non_note_until(note_path, d) ||
write_each_note_helper(d->root, note_path, mode, note_sha1);
}
struct note_delete_list {
struct note_delete_list *next;
const unsigned char *sha1;
};
static int prune_notes_helper(const unsigned char *object_sha1,
const unsigned char *note_sha1, char *note_path,
void *cb_data)
{
struct note_delete_list **l = (struct note_delete_list **) cb_data;
struct note_delete_list *n;
if (has_sha1_file(object_sha1))
return 0; /* nothing to do for this note */
/* failed to find object => prune this note */
n = (struct note_delete_list *) xmalloc(sizeof(*n));
n->next = *l;
n->sha1 = object_sha1;
*l = n;
return 0;
}
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
int combine_notes_concatenate(unsigned char *cur_sha1,
const unsigned char *new_sha1)
{
char *cur_msg = NULL, *new_msg = NULL, *buf;
unsigned long cur_len, new_len, buf_len;
enum object_type cur_type, new_type;
int ret;
/* read in both note blob objects */
if (!is_null_sha1(new_sha1))
new_msg = read_sha1_file(new_sha1, &new_type, &new_len);
if (!new_msg || !new_len || new_type != OBJ_BLOB) {
free(new_msg);
return 0;
}
if (!is_null_sha1(cur_sha1))
cur_msg = read_sha1_file(cur_sha1, &cur_type, &cur_len);
if (!cur_msg || !cur_len || cur_type != OBJ_BLOB) {
free(cur_msg);
free(new_msg);
hashcpy(cur_sha1, new_sha1);
return 0;
}
/* we will separate the notes by a newline anyway */
if (cur_msg[cur_len - 1] == '\n')
cur_len--;
/* concatenate cur_msg and new_msg into buf */
buf_len = cur_len + 1 + new_len;
buf = (char *) xmalloc(buf_len);
memcpy(buf, cur_msg, cur_len);
buf[cur_len] = '\n';
memcpy(buf + cur_len + 1, new_msg, new_len);
free(cur_msg);
free(new_msg);
/* create a new blob object from buf */
ret = write_sha1_file(buf, buf_len, blob_type, cur_sha1);
free(buf);
return ret;
}
int combine_notes_overwrite(unsigned char *cur_sha1,
const unsigned char *new_sha1)
{
hashcpy(cur_sha1, new_sha1);
return 0;
}
int combine_notes_ignore(unsigned char *cur_sha1,
const unsigned char *new_sha1)
{
return 0;
}
static int string_list_add_one_ref(const char *path, const unsigned char *sha1,
int flag, void *cb)
{
struct string_list *refs = cb;
if (!unsorted_string_list_has_string(refs, path))
string_list_append(refs, path);
return 0;
}
void string_list_add_refs_by_glob(struct string_list *list, const char *glob)
{
if (has_glob_specials(glob)) {
for_each_glob_ref(string_list_add_one_ref, glob, list);
} else {
unsigned char sha1[20];
if (get_sha1(glob, sha1))
warning("notes ref %s is invalid", glob);
if (!unsorted_string_list_has_string(list, glob))
string_list_append(list, glob);
}
}
void string_list_add_refs_from_colon_sep(struct string_list *list,
const char *globs)
{
struct strbuf globbuf = STRBUF_INIT;
struct strbuf **split;
int i;
strbuf_addstr(&globbuf, globs);
split = strbuf_split(&globbuf, ':');
for (i = 0; split[i]; i++) {
if (!split[i]->len)
continue;
if (split[i]->buf[split[i]->len-1] == ':')
strbuf_setlen(split[i], split[i]->len-1);
string_list_add_refs_by_glob(list, split[i]->buf);
}
strbuf_list_free(split);
strbuf_release(&globbuf);
}
static int notes_display_config(const char *k, const char *v, void *cb)
{
int *load_refs = cb;
if (*load_refs && !strcmp(k, "notes.displayref")) {
if (!v)
config_error_nonbool(k);
string_list_add_refs_by_glob(&display_notes_refs, v);
}
return 0;
}
static const char *default_notes_ref(void)
{
const char *notes_ref = NULL;
if (!notes_ref)
notes_ref = getenv(GIT_NOTES_REF_ENVIRONMENT);
if (!notes_ref)
notes_ref = notes_ref_name; /* value of core.notesRef config */
if (!notes_ref)
notes_ref = GIT_NOTES_DEFAULT_REF;
return notes_ref;
}
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
void init_notes(struct notes_tree *t, const char *notes_ref,
combine_notes_fn combine_notes, int flags)
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
{
unsigned char sha1[20], object_sha1[20];
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
unsigned mode;
struct leaf_node root_tree;
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
assert(!t->initialized);
if (!notes_ref)
notes_ref = default_notes_ref();
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
if (!combine_notes)
combine_notes = combine_notes_concatenate;
t->root = (struct int_node *) xcalloc(sizeof(struct int_node), 1);
t->first_non_note = NULL;
t->prev_non_note = NULL;
t->ref = notes_ref ? xstrdup(notes_ref) : NULL;
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
t->combine_notes = combine_notes;
t->initialized = 1;
t->dirty = 0;
if (flags & NOTES_INIT_EMPTY || !notes_ref ||
read_ref(notes_ref, object_sha1))
return;
if (get_tree_entry(object_sha1, "", sha1, &mode))
die("Failed to read notes tree referenced by %s (%s)",
notes_ref, object_sha1);
Teach the notes lookup code to parse notes trees with various fanout schemes The semantics used when parsing notes trees (with regards to fanout subtrees) follow Dscho's proposal fairly closely: - No concatenation/merging of notes is performed. If there are several notes objects referencing a given commit, only one of those objects are used. - If a notes object for a given commit is present in the "root" notes tree, no subtrees are consulted; the object in the root tree is used directly. - If there are more than one subtree that prefix-matches the given commit, only the subtree with the longest matching prefix is consulted. This means that if the given commit is e.g. "deadbeef", and the notes tree have subtrees "de" and "dead", then the following paths in the notes tree are searched: "deadbeef", "dead/beef". Note that "de/adbeef" is NOT searched. - Fanout directories (subtrees) must references a whole number of bytes from the SHA1 sum they subdivide. E.g. subtrees "dead" and "de" are acceptable; "d" and "dea" are not. - Multiple levels of fanout are allowed. All the above rules apply recursively. E.g. "de/adbeef" is preferred over "de/adbe/ef", etc. This patch changes the in-memory datastructure for holding parsed notes: Instead of holding all note (and subtree) entries in a hash table, a simple 16-tree structure is used instead. The tree structure consists of 16-arrays as internal nodes, and note/subtree entries as leaf nodes. The tree is traversed by indexing subsequent nibbles of the search key until a leaf node is encountered. If a subtree entry is encountered while searching for a note, the subtree is unpacked into the 16-tree structure, and the search continues into that subtree. The new algorithm performs significantly better in the cases where only a fraction of the notes need to be looked up (this is assumed to be the common case for notes lookup). The new code even performs marginally better in the worst case (where _all_ the notes are looked up). In addition to this, comes the massive performance win associated with organizing the notes tree according to some fanout scheme. Even a simple 2/38 fanout scheme is dramatically quicker to traverse (going from tens of seconds to sub-second runtimes). As for memory usage, the new code is marginally better than the old code in the worst case, but in the case of looking up only some notes from a notes tree with proper fanout, the new code uses only a small fraction of the memory needed to hold the entire notes tree. However, there is one casualty of this patch. The old notes lookup code was able to parse notes that were associated with non-SHA1s (e.g. refs). The new code requires the referenced object to be named by a SHA1 sum. Still, this is not considered a major setback, since the notes infrastructure was not originally intended to annotate objects outside the Git object database. Cc: Johannes Schindelin <johannes.schindelin@gmx.de> Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
hashclr(root_tree.key_sha1);
hashcpy(root_tree.val_sha1, sha1);
load_subtree(t, &root_tree, t->root, 0);
}
struct notes_tree **load_notes_trees(struct string_list *refs)
{
struct string_list_item *item;
int counter = 0;
struct notes_tree **trees;
trees = xmalloc((refs->nr+1) * sizeof(struct notes_tree *));
for_each_string_list_item(item, refs) {
struct notes_tree *t = xcalloc(1, sizeof(struct notes_tree));
init_notes(t, item->string, combine_notes_ignore, 0);
trees[counter++] = t;
}
trees[counter] = NULL;
return trees;
}
void init_display_notes(struct display_notes_opt *opt)
{
char *display_ref_env;
int load_config_refs = 0;
display_notes_refs.strdup_strings = 1;
assert(!display_notes_trees);
if (!opt || !opt->suppress_default_notes) {
string_list_append(&display_notes_refs, default_notes_ref());
display_ref_env = getenv(GIT_NOTES_DISPLAY_REF_ENVIRONMENT);
if (display_ref_env) {
string_list_add_refs_from_colon_sep(&display_notes_refs,
display_ref_env);
load_config_refs = 0;
} else
load_config_refs = 1;
}
git_config(notes_display_config, &load_config_refs);
if (opt && opt->extra_notes_refs) {
struct string_list_item *item;
for_each_string_list_item(item, opt->extra_notes_refs)
string_list_add_refs_by_glob(&display_notes_refs,
item->string);
}
display_notes_trees = load_notes_trees(&display_notes_refs);
string_list_clear(&display_notes_refs, 0);
}
void add_note(struct notes_tree *t, const unsigned char *object_sha1,
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
const unsigned char *note_sha1, combine_notes_fn combine_notes)
{
struct leaf_node *l;
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
assert(t->initialized);
t->dirty = 1;
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
if (!combine_notes)
combine_notes = t->combine_notes;
l = (struct leaf_node *) xmalloc(sizeof(struct leaf_node));
hashcpy(l->key_sha1, object_sha1);
hashcpy(l->val_sha1, note_sha1);
note_tree_insert(t, t->root, 0, l, PTR_TYPE_NOTE, combine_notes);
}
int remove_note(struct notes_tree *t, const unsigned char *object_sha1)
{
struct leaf_node l;
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
assert(t->initialized);
hashcpy(l.key_sha1, object_sha1);
hashclr(l.val_sha1);
note_tree_remove(t, t->root, 0, &l);
if (is_null_sha1(l.val_sha1)) // no note was removed
return 1;
t->dirty = 1;
return 0;
}
const unsigned char *get_note(struct notes_tree *t,
const unsigned char *object_sha1)
{
struct leaf_node *found;
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
assert(t->initialized);
found = note_tree_find(t, t->root, 0, object_sha1);
return found ? found->val_sha1 : NULL;
}
int for_each_note(struct notes_tree *t, int flags, each_note_fn fn,
void *cb_data)
{
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
assert(t->initialized);
return for_each_note_helper(t, t->root, 0, 0, flags, fn, cb_data);
}
int write_notes_tree(struct notes_tree *t, unsigned char *result)
{
struct tree_write_stack root;
struct write_each_note_data cb_data;
int ret;
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
assert(t->initialized);
/* Prepare for traversal of current notes tree */
root.next = NULL; /* last forward entry in list is grounded */
strbuf_init(&root.buf, 256 * (32 + 40)); /* assume 256 entries */
root.path[0] = root.path[1] = '\0';
cb_data.root = &root;
cb_data.next_non_note = t->first_non_note;
/* Write tree objects representing current notes tree */
ret = for_each_note(t, FOR_EACH_NOTE_DONT_UNPACK_SUBTREES |
FOR_EACH_NOTE_YIELD_SUBTREES,
write_each_note, &cb_data) ||
write_each_non_note_until(NULL, &cb_data) ||
tree_write_stack_finish_subtree(&root) ||
write_sha1_file(root.buf.buf, root.buf.len, tree_type, result);
strbuf_release(&root.buf);
return ret;
}
void prune_notes(struct notes_tree *t, int flags)
{
struct note_delete_list *l = NULL;
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
assert(t->initialized);
for_each_note(t, 0, prune_notes_helper, &l);
while (l) {
if (flags & NOTES_PRUNE_VERBOSE)
printf("%s\n", sha1_to_hex(l->sha1));
if (!(flags & NOTES_PRUNE_DRYRUN))
remove_note(t, l->sha1);
l = l->next;
}
}
void free_notes(struct notes_tree *t)
{
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
if (t->root)
note_tree_free(t->root);
free(t->root);
while (t->first_non_note) {
t->prev_non_note = t->first_non_note->next;
free(t->first_non_note->path);
free(t->first_non_note);
t->first_non_note = t->prev_non_note;
}
free(t->ref);
memset(t, 0, sizeof(struct notes_tree));
}
void format_note(struct notes_tree *t, const unsigned char *object_sha1,
struct strbuf *sb, const char *output_encoding, int flags)
{
static const char utf8[] = "utf-8";
const unsigned char *sha1;
char *msg, *msg_p;
unsigned long linelen, msglen;
enum object_type type;
if (!t)
t = &default_notes_tree;
if (!t->initialized)
Refactor notes concatenation into a flexible interface for combining notes When adding a note to an object that already has an existing note, the current solution is to concatenate the contents of the two notes. However, the caller may instead wish to _overwrite_ the existing note with the new note, or maybe even _ignore_ the new note, and keep the existing one. There might also be other ways of combining notes that are only known to the caller. Therefore, instead of unconditionally concatenating notes, we let the caller specify how to combine notes, by passing in a pointer to a function for combining notes. The caller may choose to implement its own function for notes combining, but normally one of the following three conveniently supplied notes combination functions will be sufficient: - combine_notes_concatenate() combines the two notes by appending the contents of the new note to the contents of the existing note. - combine_notes_overwrite() replaces the existing note with the new note. - combine_notes_ignore() keeps the existing note, and ignores the new note. A combine_notes function can be passed to init_notes() to choose a default combine_notes function for that notes tree. If NULL is given, the notes tree falls back to combine_notes_concatenate() as the ultimate default. A combine_notes function can also be passed directly to add_note(), to control the notes combining behaviour for a note addition in particular. If NULL is passed, the combine_notes function registered for the given notes tree is used. Signed-off-by: Johan Herland <johan@herland.net> Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
15 years ago
init_notes(t, NULL, NULL, 0);
sha1 = get_note(t, object_sha1);
if (!sha1)
return;
if (!(msg = read_sha1_file(sha1, &type, &msglen)) || !msglen ||
type != OBJ_BLOB) {
free(msg);
return;
}
if (output_encoding && *output_encoding &&
strcmp(utf8, output_encoding)) {
char *reencoded = reencode_string(msg, output_encoding, utf8);
if (reencoded) {
free(msg);
msg = reencoded;
msglen = strlen(msg);
}
}
/* we will end the annotation by a newline anyway */
if (msglen && msg[msglen - 1] == '\n')
msglen--;
if (flags & NOTES_SHOW_HEADER) {
const char *ref = t->ref;
if (!ref || !strcmp(ref, GIT_NOTES_DEFAULT_REF)) {
strbuf_addstr(sb, "\nNotes:\n");
} else {
if (!prefixcmp(ref, "refs/"))
ref += 5;
if (!prefixcmp(ref, "notes/"))
ref += 6;
strbuf_addf(sb, "\nNotes (%s):\n", ref);
}
}
for (msg_p = msg; msg_p < msg + msglen; msg_p += linelen + 1) {
linelen = strchrnul(msg_p, '\n') - msg_p;
if (flags & NOTES_INDENT)
strbuf_addstr(sb, " ");
strbuf_add(sb, msg_p, linelen);
strbuf_addch(sb, '\n');
}
free(msg);
}
void format_display_notes(const unsigned char *object_sha1,
struct strbuf *sb, const char *output_encoding, int flags)
{
int i;
assert(display_notes_trees);
for (i = 0; display_notes_trees[i]; i++)
format_note(display_notes_trees[i], object_sha1, sb,
output_encoding, flags);
}
int copy_note(struct notes_tree *t,
const unsigned char *from_obj, const unsigned char *to_obj,
int force, combine_notes_fn combine_fn)
{
const unsigned char *note = get_note(t, from_obj);
const unsigned char *existing_note = get_note(t, to_obj);
if (!force && existing_note)
return 1;
if (note)
add_note(t, to_obj, note, combine_fn);
else if (existing_note)
add_note(t, to_obj, null_sha1, combine_fn);
return 0;
}