You can not select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.

61 lines
1.4 KiB

#!/bin/sh
#
# Copyright (c) 2005 Junio C Hamano
#
test_description='git checkout-index test.
This test registers the following filesystem structure in the
cache:
path0 - a file
path1/file1 - a file in a directory
And then tries to checkout in a work tree that has the following:
path0/file0 - a file in a directory
path1 - a file
The git checkout-index command should fail when attempting to checkout
path0, finding it is occupied by a directory, and path1/file1, finding
path1 is occupied by a non-directory. With "-f" flag, it should remove
the conflicting paths and succeed.
'
. ./test-lib.sh
date >path0
mkdir path1
date >path1/file1
test_expect_success \
'git update-index --add various paths.' \
'git update-index --add path0 path1/file1'
rm -fr path0 path1
mkdir path0
date >path0/file0
date >path1
Sane use of test_expect_failure Originally, test_expect_failure was designed to be the opposite of test_expect_success, but this was a bad decision. Most tests run a series of commands that leads to the single command that needs to be tested, like this: test_expect_{success,failure} 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && what is to be tested ' And expecting a failure exit from the whole sequence misses the point of writing tests. Your setup$N that are supposed to succeed may have failed without even reaching what you are trying to test. The only valid use of test_expect_failure is to check a trivial single command that is expected to fail, which is a minority in tests of Porcelain-ish commands. This large-ish patch rewrites all uses of test_expect_failure to use test_expect_success and rewrites the condition of what is tested, like this: test_expect_success 'test title' ' setup1 && setup2 && setup3 && ! this command should fail ' test_expect_failure is redefined to serve as a reminder that that test *should* succeed but due to a known breakage in git it currently does not pass. So if git-foo command should create a file 'bar' but you discovered a bug that it doesn't, you can write a test like this: test_expect_failure 'git-foo should create bar' ' rm -f bar && git foo && test -f bar ' This construct acts similar to test_expect_success, but instead of reporting "ok/FAIL" like test_expect_success does, the outcome is reported as "FIXED/still broken". Signed-off-by: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
17 years ago
test_expect_success \
'git checkout-index without -f should fail on conflicting work tree.' \
'test_must_fail git checkout-index -a'
test_expect_success \
'git checkout-index with -f should succeed.' \
'git checkout-index -f -a'
test_expect_success \
'git checkout-index conflicting paths.' \
'test -f path0 && test -d path1 && test -f path1/file1'
test_expect_success SYMLINKS 'checkout-index -f twice with --prefix' '
mkdir -p tar/get &&
ln -s tar/get there &&
echo first &&
git checkout-index -a -f --prefix=there/ &&
echo second &&
git checkout-index -a -f --prefix=there/
'
test_done