Currently, dtc will generate phandles for nodes which are referenced
elsewhere in the tree. phandles can also be explicitly assigned by
defining the linux,phandle property. However, there is no way,
currently to tell dtc to generate a phandle for a node if it is not
referenced elsewhere. This is inconvenient when it's expected that
later processing on the flat tree might add nodes which _will_
the node in question.
One way one might attempt to do this is with the construct:
mynode: mynode {
linux,phandle = <&mynode>;
/* ... */
};
Though it's a trifle odd, there's really only one sensible meaning
which can be assigned to this construct: allocate a unique phandle to
"mynode" and put that in its linux,phandle property (as always).
Currently, however, dtc will choke on this self-reference. This patch
corrects this, making the construct above give the expected results.
It also ensures a more meaningful error message is given if you
attempt to process the nonsensical construct:
mynode: mynode {
linux,phandle = <&someothernode>;
/* ... */
};
The 'references' testcase is extended to cover this case, as well.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This patch marks various functions not shared between c files
'static', as they should be. There are a couple of functions in dtc,
and many in the testsuite.
This is *almost* enough to enable the -Wmissing-prototypes warning.
It's not quite enough, because there's a mess of junk in the flex
generated code which triggers that warning which I'm not yet sure how
to deal with.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Currently, dtc generates a few gcc build warnings if built for a
64-bit target, due to the altered type of uint64_t and size_t. This
patch fixes the warnings (without generating new warnings for 32-bit).
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>