With -Wsign-compare, compilers warn about a mismatching signedness in
comparisons in various files in the tests/ directory.
For about half of the cases we can simply change the signed variable to
be of an unsigned type, because they will never need to store negative
values (which is the best fix of the problem).
In the remaining cases we can cast the signed variable to an unsigned
type, provided we know for sure it is not negative.
We see two different scenarios here:
- We either just explicitly checked for this variable to be positive
(if (rc < 0) FAIL();), or
- We rely on a function returning only positive values in the "length"
pointer if the function returned successfully: which we just checked.
At two occassions we compare with a constant "-1" (even though the
variable is unsigned), so we just change this to ~0U to create an
unsigned comparison value.
Since this is about the tests, let's also add explicit tests for those
values really not being negative.
This fixes "make tests" (but not "make check" yet), when compiled
with -Wsign-compare.
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Message-Id: <20210618172030.9684-2-andre.przywara@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Replace instances in tests of mostly LGPL-2.1 license boilerplate
with SPDX tags.
Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Message-Id: <20190620211944.9378-5-robh@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
tests will need fdt type definitions provided in a subsequent patch
to libfdt_env.h. Since libfdt.h includes libfdt_env.h in the right
order anyway, just remove the fdt.h include.
Signed-off-by: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@freescale.com>
Acked-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This patch marks various functions not shared between c files
'static', as they should be. There are a couple of functions in dtc,
and many in the testsuite.
This is *almost* enough to enable the -Wmissing-prototypes warning.
It's not quite enough, because there's a mess of junk in the flex
generated code which triggers that warning which I'm not yet sure how
to deal with.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
At present, the fdt_subnode_offset() and fdt_path_offset() functions
in libfdt require the exact name of the nodes in question be passed,
including unit address.
This is contrary to traditional OF-like finddevice() behaviour, which
allows the unit address to be omitted (which is useful when the device
name is unambiguous without the address).
This patch introduces similar behaviour to
fdt_subnode_offset_namelen(), and hence to fdt_subnode_offset() and
fdt_path_offset() which are implemented in terms of the former. The
unit address can be omitted from the given node name. If this is
ambiguous, the first such node in the flattened tree will be selected
(this behaviour is consistent with IEEE1275 which specifies only that
an arbitrary node matching the given information be selected).
This very small change is then followed by many more diffs which
change the test examples and testcases to exercise this behaviour.
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
This patch adds a new fdt_get_name() function to libfdt which will
return a node's name string (including unit address, if any).
Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
Andre Przywara