Warn on node name unit-address presence/absence mismatch
ePAPR 1.1 section 2.2.1.1 "Node Name Requirements" specifies that any node that has a reg property must include a unit address in its name with value matching the first entry in its reg property. Conversely, if a node does not have a reg property, the node name must not include a unit address. Also allow ranges property as it is deemed valid, but ePAPR is not clear about it. Implement a check for this. The code doesn't validate the format of the unit address; ePAPR implies this may vary from (containing bus) binding to binding, so doing so would be much more complex. Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> [robh: also allow non-empty ranges] Signed-off-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> [moved new test in check_table] Signed-off-by: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>main
parent
2e53f9d2f0
commit
c9d9121683
26
checks.c
26
checks.c
|
@ -294,6 +294,30 @@ static void check_node_name_format(struct check *c, struct node *dt,
|
|||
}
|
||||
NODE_ERROR(node_name_format, NULL, &node_name_chars);
|
||||
|
||||
static void check_unit_address_vs_reg(struct check *c, struct node *dt,
|
||||
struct node *node)
|
||||
{
|
||||
const char *unitname = get_unitname(node);
|
||||
struct property *prop = get_property(node, "reg");
|
||||
|
||||
if (!prop) {
|
||||
prop = get_property(node, "ranges");
|
||||
if (prop && !prop->val.len)
|
||||
prop = NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (prop) {
|
||||
if (!unitname[0])
|
||||
FAIL(c, "Node %s has a reg or ranges property, but no unit name",
|
||||
node->fullpath);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (unitname[0])
|
||||
FAIL(c, "Node %s has a unit name, but no reg property",
|
||||
node->fullpath);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
NODE_WARNING(unit_address_vs_reg, NULL);
|
||||
|
||||
static void check_property_name_chars(struct check *c, struct node *dt,
|
||||
struct node *node, struct property *prop)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -667,6 +691,8 @@ static struct check *check_table[] = {
|
|||
|
||||
&addr_size_cells, ®_format, &ranges_format,
|
||||
|
||||
&unit_address_vs_reg,
|
||||
|
||||
&avoid_default_addr_size,
|
||||
&obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller,
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
|||
/dts-v1/;
|
||||
|
||||
/ {
|
||||
#address-cells = <1>;
|
||||
#size-cells = <1>;
|
||||
|
||||
node {
|
||||
reg = <0 1>;
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
|
@ -445,6 +445,8 @@ dtc_tests () {
|
|||
check_tests reg-ranges-root.dts reg_format ranges_format
|
||||
check_tests default-addr-size.dts avoid_default_addr_size
|
||||
check_tests obsolete-chosen-interrupt-controller.dts obsolete_chosen_interrupt_controller
|
||||
check_tests reg-without-unit-addr.dts unit_address_vs_reg
|
||||
check_tests unit-addr-without-reg.dts unit_address_vs_reg
|
||||
run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh node_name_chars -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_node_char.dtb
|
||||
run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh node_name_format -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_node_format.dtb
|
||||
run_sh_test dtc-checkfails.sh prop_name_chars -- -I dtb -O dtb bad_prop_char.dtb
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
|
|||
/dts-v1/;
|
||||
|
||||
/ {
|
||||
#address-cells = <1>;
|
||||
#size-cells = <1>;
|
||||
|
||||
node@1 {
|
||||
};
|
||||
};
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue